Integral Fast Reactor/Debate Guide: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(move section from Discussion tab)
 
(add intro paragraph)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{TOC|right}}
Nuclear power is a controversial topic, and some of the controversies remain unsettled, even after the facts in the article are agreed on. This '''Debate Guide''' will provide a concise summary from each side of these unsettled issues. Much of this discussion is collected from Internet forums and other unreliable sources. We welcome updates with better sourcing.
== Readiness of this design ==
== Readiness of this design ==
The National Academy of Sciences has just come out with a new report [https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26630/laying-the-foundation-for-new-and-advanced-nuclear-reactors-in-the-united-states ''Laying the Foundation for New and Advanced Nuclear Reactors in the United States'']. They have concluded that this design needs a lot more work.<br>
The National Academy of Sciences has a report [https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26630/laying-the-foundation-for-new-and-advanced-nuclear-reactors-in-the-united-states ''Laying the Foundation for New and Advanced Nuclear Reactors in the United States'']. They have concluded that this design needs a lot more work.<br>
From the Summary:<br>
From the Summary:<br>
P.1) demonstrations of advanced nuclear designs are not expected until the late 2020s or early 2030s,<br>  
P.1) demonstrations of advanced nuclear designs are not expected until the late 2020s or early 2030s,<br>  

Revision as of 05:02, 9 May 2023

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Debate Guide [?]
 
This is a special subpage (not present on all articles). See CZ:Subpages for more details.

Nuclear power is a controversial topic, and some of the controversies remain unsettled, even after the facts in the article are agreed on. This Debate Guide will provide a concise summary from each side of these unsettled issues. Much of this discussion is collected from Internet forums and other unreliable sources. We welcome updates with better sourcing.

Readiness of this design

The National Academy of Sciences has a report Laying the Foundation for New and Advanced Nuclear Reactors in the United States. They have concluded that this design needs a lot more work.
From the Summary:
P.1) demonstrations of advanced nuclear designs are not expected until the late 2020s or early 2030s,
P.2) SFRs and HTGRs will need to address supply chain and high-assay low-enrichment uranium (HALEU) issues and operational reliability, which have impacted those designs in the past.
... for example, reactor core materials and cladding.
From Chapter 2, Finding 2-5) ... More mature concepts, such as ... small modular sodium fast reactors, and ... might be technically ready for demonstration by the end of this decade.