Talk:Sturm-Liouville theory: Difference between revisions
imported>David E. Volk (Bessel function in S-L seems off, but I am not sure of this.) |
imported>David E. Volk m (→Bessel equation in S-L form: nowiki fix to equation parts) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Bessel equation in S-L form == | == Bessel equation in S-L form == | ||
Is the Bessel equation in S-L form correct? I don't see where the xy' term has gone. Clearly everything was divided by x, and the first term (after division by x) XY'' becomes (xy')'. | Is the Bessel equation in S-L form correct? I don't see where the xy' term has gone. Clearly everything was divided by x, and the first term (after division by x) <nowiki> XY'' becomes (xy')'. | ||
Shouldn't (xy'' + y') become (xy' + y)'? | Shouldn't (xy'' + y') become (xy' + y)' </nowiki>? | ||
[[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 13:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC) | [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 13:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:24, 6 October 2009
Numbered equations
Hi Daniel,
I had to transform the templates provided in the WP article for numbered equations into plain old wikimarkup. I attempted to bring these templates over from WP, but they called many other templates and when I got them all over, the combined result didn't work. I decided to use a simple bit of html that defined a span with right justification and also defined an anchor. To reference the equation you then only need to insert a mediawiki markup referencing the anchor. It wouldn't be hard to turn this all into two templates if you think that would be useful. Dan Nessett 19:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Bessel equation in S-L form
Is the Bessel equation in S-L form correct? I don't see where the xy' term has gone. Clearly everything was divided by x, and the first term (after division by x) XY'' becomes (xy')'. Shouldn't (xy'' + y') become (xy' + y)' ? David E. Volk 13:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)