CZ:Approval of CZ namespace pages: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger m (CZ:Approval for CZ pages moved to CZ:Approval of CZ namespace pages: Add "namespace" in order to make it clear we're not talking about CZ articles, but only about CZ: namespace pages) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 13:03, 29 April 2008
Approval for CZ pages
CZ: pages may be approved by members of the executive committee (or by another relevant group nominated by the executive committee), and once approved a draft page is open to revise, giving two versions, a formally approved version, and an evolving draft alternative. Very few CZ: pages will need to be approved in this way; but some, especially those that express important rules or policy statements, need to have a stable form if they are to be useful. At the same time, the draft page can then become a way of suggesting significant changes, open to anyone, without fear of disrupting established practices. To encourage the rewriting of other important pages for clarity, it may sometimes help to have an extant approved version while an alternative is actively worked up.
Some pages express rules or guidance specific to a formally constituted subgroup of Citizendium (such as workgroups). In such cases, the workgroup itself may approve these pages if they choose to; they should alert the Executive Committee in case of any uncertainty about whose responsibility a particular page is. Ad hoc groups do not have the power to approve until formally recognised as a constituent part of Citizendium.
Process
A member of the executive committee (or relevant group) places a "ToApprove" template on the article's talk page, and on the Talk page, explains why an approved version is needed or desirable. That template will be marked with a date, usually several days to a week from the date that it is placed.
If the approval template remains there, approval will occur on that date. Meanwhile, discussion and edits continue. Edits at this stage should be made only by executive committee members, involved authors and relevant parties (e.g. constables). Other members of Citizendium should make recommendations and criticisms on the talk page. At this stage, any other interested body (such as the Editorial Council) may additionally be invited to offer their views, which will be taken into account.
At least one other member of the executive committee (or relevant group) must support approval. If another member of the executive committee (or relevant group) objects to approval, then he or she should explain why on the talk page, and further views sought.
If the nominator notes that the discussion on the talk page that has occurred since the nomination for approval brings up important objections, then he or she may delay the date for approval to allow for work to continue. The nominator may also change the version nominated for approval on the "to approve" template to an updated draft. Unless the template is removed, on the designated date, a sysop then freezes the approved version of the article under an Approved template. At that freeze, a draft form of the article is generated. This draft is open to edits as are all unapproved articles on the wiki. After approval, copyediting and minor changes may be performed by any member of the executive committee (or relevant group) with the help of the approvals editor. This may occur at any time.
Citizendium Organization | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CZ:Home | Workgroups | Personnel | Governance | Proposals | Recruitment | Contact | Donate | FAQ | Sitemap | |||||||
How to Edit |
|