Talk:The Enlightenment: Difference between revisions
imported>Hayford Peirce (→A contradiction: One line says it was "generally" a movement; the next one says it was "narrowly" a movement. Which one is correct?) |
imported>Paul Wormer (→Spinoza: new section) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Which is it? It can't be both.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 23:25, 26 December 2007 (CST) | Which is it? It can't be both.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 23:25, 26 December 2007 (CST) | ||
== Spinoza == | |||
Lately I have been reading that Baruch Spinoza was one of the early "enlightners". I don't know enough about him or the enlightment to have a personal opinion. Is he worth mentioning?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 09:30, 27 December 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 09:30, 27 December 2007
A contradiction
"The Enlightenment was an 18th-century movement in Western philosophy and intellectual life generally, especially in the sciences. Some classifications also include 17th-century philosophy, usually called the Age of Reason."
"The term can more narrowly refer to the intellectual movement of The Enlightenment,"
The first sentence says it was a movement "generally". Then the second line says that it was "more narrowly" the intellectual movement.
Which is it? It can't be both.... Hayford Peirce 23:25, 26 December 2007 (CST)
Spinoza
Lately I have been reading that Baruch Spinoza was one of the early "enlightners". I don't know enough about him or the enlightment to have a personal opinion. Is he worth mentioning?--Paul Wormer 09:30, 27 December 2007 (CST)
- Article with Definition
- History Category Check
- Philosophy Category Check
- Politics Category Check
- Stub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Stub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Philosophy Stub Articles
- Philosophy Internal Articles
- Politics Stub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Philosophy Underlinked Articles
- Politics Underlinked Articles
- History tag