Talk:Gut-brain signalling: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Celine Caquineau
No edit summary
imported>Celine Caquineau
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


Glad to hear from you, Andrew! You'll get use to the website in no time! [[User:Celine Caquineau|Celine Caquineau]] 10:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Glad to hear from you, Andrew! You'll get use to the website in no time! [[User:Celine Caquineau|Celine Caquineau]] 10:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
'''Your article so far:''' This week’s deadline was to produce a rough draft with an introduction and a well structured plan illustrating the direction and focus of your article. Good start with the introduction, however the article’s plan is not clear. You need to state each section and subsection with appropriate titles like you have done for ‘orexigenic signals’. I also suggest removing sentences & references from the original template to tidy up the article a bit more.
What has been written is written well. Remember to keep the sentences simple and to define any ‘too scientific’ terms to ensure your encyclopaedia article can be understood by every reader. Including diagrams could help explaining difficult concepts.
Your bibliography page is good, however you need to link key facts and studies mentioned in your main article with references in the text as well as in the ‘References’ section at the end of your article ( If needed the bibliography page will be then updated accordingly).
Have a look at the other articles. Some of them cover subjects close or even similar to yours, you might have to insert links between your page and theirs.
Finally, I can only encourage all of you to contribute equally to produce a very good article. You need to interact and communicate more (use the talkpage!). I have no doubt that you will be producing a very good article but you need to raise  your game now! [[User:Celine Caquineau|Celine Caquineau]] 14:33, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:33, 28 October 2009

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The interaction between the gastrointestinal tract and the brain. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Health Sciences [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Graeme Daniel Logue 16:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Rachael Hutt 16:21, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Pauline McAleer 14:30, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Andrew Critchley 14:36, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Very good start, good selection. Any news from Andrew? Celine Caquineau 09:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

How's the plan going? Andrew, I need to know if you're still here! Celine Caquineau 14:15, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Celine, sorry I thought I had signed it but I hadn't done it right! This website is quite tricky to get the hang of. Yes we have a rough plan of what we are going to cover and are currently writing our individual sub-sections.Andrew Critchley 14:40, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Glad to hear from you, Andrew! You'll get use to the website in no time! Celine Caquineau 10:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Your article so far: This week’s deadline was to produce a rough draft with an introduction and a well structured plan illustrating the direction and focus of your article. Good start with the introduction, however the article’s plan is not clear. You need to state each section and subsection with appropriate titles like you have done for ‘orexigenic signals’. I also suggest removing sentences & references from the original template to tidy up the article a bit more.

What has been written is written well. Remember to keep the sentences simple and to define any ‘too scientific’ terms to ensure your encyclopaedia article can be understood by every reader. Including diagrams could help explaining difficult concepts.

Your bibliography page is good, however you need to link key facts and studies mentioned in your main article with references in the text as well as in the ‘References’ section at the end of your article ( If needed the bibliography page will be then updated accordingly).

Have a look at the other articles. Some of them cover subjects close or even similar to yours, you might have to insert links between your page and theirs.

Finally, I can only encourage all of you to contribute equally to produce a very good article. You need to interact and communicate more (use the talkpage!). I have no doubt that you will be producing a very good article but you need to raise your game now! Celine Caquineau 14:33, 28 October 2009 (UTC)