Johannes Kepler

Johannes Kepler (Weil der Stadt 1571 - Regensburg 1630) was an astronomer whose name lives on in his three laws on the motion of the planets orbiting the sun. Kepler was a genuine Copernican, in contrast to most of his contemporaries, who still adhered to the geocentric system of Ptolemy.

Career

After the death of Tycho Brahe in 1601 Kepler became the Mathematicus Imperialis at the court of emperor Rudolph II in Prague. He stayed at the court until the abdication of Rudolph in 1612. During this period he wrote Astronomia Nova after an analysis of Tycho's detailed observations of the Martian orbit. It took Kepler eight years to discover that an elliptic orbit was needed to fit these data. In 1612 Kepler accepted a position in Linz (Austria).

Kepler lived and worked amid the great religious wars raging all over Europe. Kepler was Lutheran and had to flee several times during his lifetime from the Catholics. Belief in witchcraft was still widespread among both Catholics and Protestants. Between 1615 and 1621 it took Kepler much time, money, and use of his influence as Imperial Mathematician to get his mother absolved of the accusation of being a witch.

Theories

Johannes Kepler is sometimes described as a somewhat muddleheaded mystic. Usually, one then refers to the planetary theory that Kepler proposed at the age of twenty-four. He then put forward that the six planets: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn (the only ones then known) move on surfaces of spheres that envelop the five regular polyhedrons. By imposing the order, octahedron, icosahedron, dodecahedron, tetrahedron, cube, Kepler found that the planets moving on the respective spheres, had the correct relative distances to the Sun. He was able to develop this theory as these Platonic solids can be inscribed and circumscribed by spheres. For a while Kepler was very enthusiastic about his idea, because he believed that he had found the symmetries that had guided the creation. However, when he discovered that his theory was only qualitatively correct, but not quantitatively, he dropped it.

The standard story has it that Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe (1546-1601), not knowing what to do with his observations, gave them to Kepler, who then solved the outstanding problem of the universe; the truth is more subtle. "Tycho has the world's finest observations," Kepler declared, "but he only lacks an architect to construct an edifice out of them." While Brahe had failed repeatedly to fit his brilliantly targeted observations into the outdated Ptolemaic model, Kepler, using Brahe's data, abandoned his own faulty theoretical framework and, using the Copernican model of the universe, creatively intuited his laws of planetary motion.

Kepler transformed a theoretical astronomy that was understood in terms of orbs (that is, spherical shells to which the planets were attached) by introducing a single term, "orbit" (that is, the path of a planet in space resulting from the action of physical causes expressed in laws of nature). "Orbit" was introduced into astronomy by Kepler in his Astronomia Nova (1609).

Three laws

Kepler's first law states that the planetary orbits are ellipses not circles. He surmounted here a great psychological barrier that, for instance, Copernicus had not been able to overcome. Since the days of Aristotle it was thought that the planetary motion was perfect, that is on circles or on spheres. Kepler's second law is known as the law of equal areas: A line joining a planet and the sun sweeps out equal areas during equal intervals of time. The first and second law were published in Kepler's book Astronomia Nova (1609).

Kepler's third law (published in the book Harmonice Mundi 1619) states that the squares of the orbital periods T of all planets are directly proportional to the cubes of the semi-major axis a of the orbits, $\scriptstyle T^{2}=a^{3}~$ (when the right units for a and T are chosen). Kepler himself pointed out the example of Saturn which is nine times further removed from the sun than the earth, and hence a Saturn year takes 27 earth years. (Kepler's third law is a first approximation, in reality the Saturn year takes 29.46 earth year).

Comets, astrology and the esoteric

Kepler (like Tycho Brahe) devoted much of his time and energy to astrology as well as astronomy. Following the ideas developed by both Plato and Socrates, he believed that the cosmos was governed by the "anima," or soul, of all things that responded to external geometric configurations. However, Kepler could not identify the connection between the forces of the cosmos and the behavior of humans. In De Cometis Libelli Tres (1619), Kepler defined comets as ephemeral celestial phenomena originating from an ethereal aura whose essence was in many ways the same as that surrounding the earth in the form of air. Kepler linked the celestial and terrestrial realms through common physical characteristics, comparing the origins, activities, and eventual endpoints of comets with the corresponding attributes of earthly entities such as igneous outbursts and airborne projectiles. More fundamentally, Kepler relied in his "earthly account" of comets on a common metaphysical foundation, in which phenomena in the celestial and sublunary spheres exemplified the same underlying mathematical principles. Accordingly, Kepler claimed that the terrestrial realm realized the divine architectonic design originally implemented in the creation of the cosmos as a whole. His approach also explained how the sublunary world, in the form of the facultates animales of the earth and its inhabitants, discerned and responded to astrological influences from the heavens. Kepler did not, however, intend to make astrological predictions the focal point for De Cometis. Instead, he sought a more thorough natural knowledge of comets, in which mathematics, the metaphysical link between the celestial and terrestrial realms, was given a more prominent place in understanding the origins and interactions of earthly and heavenly phenomena.

In his posthumous Somnium (1634), Kepler unveils a strange dream, an allegory, that portrays the heavens as if from a lunar perspective and via demons in caves where their minds reflect "in accordance with our inclination." Kepler insisted that this preoccupation with shadows, darkness, and mysteries was directly related to the observations and knowledge of his science. In part, his intention was to advance a Copernican position masked as a fable that might attract readers otherwise put off by the mathematics and empirical data which, in any case, he believed were inadequate to scientific breakthroughs. Moreover, two classical models provided examples for such allegorizing about the cosmos: Lucian's A True Story and Plutarch's Concerning the Face Which Appears in the Orb of the Moon. Somnium aimed to convert the reader's modes of vision and knowledge acquisition.

Bibliography

• Aiton Eric J. "Kepler's Second Law of Planetary Motion." Isis 60 (1969), 75-90. in JSTOR
• Baumgardt, Carola. Johannes Kepler: Life and Letters, (1951),
• Beer, Arthur, and Peter Beer eds. Kepler: Four Hundred Years. Vistas in Astronomy 18. (1975), essays by scholars.
• Caspar, Max. Johannes Kepler: 1571-1630(1993), standard biography
• Connor, James A. Kepler's Witch: An Astronomer's Discovery of Cosmic Order amid Religious War, Political Intrigue, and the Heresy Trial of His Mother (2004) excerpt and text search
• Dreyer J. L. E. A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler. (2d ed. 1953).
• Ferguson, Kitty. Tycho & Kepler: The Unlikely Partnership That Forever Changed Our Understanding of the Heavens (2002).
• Field J. V. Kepler's Geometrical Cosmology. (1988)
• Forbus, Kenneth D. et al. "Analogical Reasoning and Conceptual Change: A Case Study of Johannes Kepler." Journal of the Learning Sciences. Volume: 6#1 1997. pp 3-41online edition
• Gilder, Joshua, and Anne-Lee Gilder. Heavenly Intrigue: Johannes Kepler, Tycho Brahe, and the Murder behind One of History's Greatest Scientific Discoveries (2004)
• Gingerich Owen. "Kepler, Johannes." In The Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. 7, ed. C. C. Gillispie and M. DeBruhl, pp. 289-312. (1973).
• Hanson, Norwood. "The Copernican Disturbance and the Keplerian Revolution." Journal of the History of Ideas 22 (1961), 169-184. in JSTOR
• Jardine, Nicholas. "The Forging of Modern Realism: Clavius and Kepler against the Sceptics," Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 10 (1979), 141-73
• Koestler, Arthur. The sleepwalkers (1963), popular history.
• Kozhamthadam, Job. The Discovery of Kepler's Laws: The Interaction of Science, Philosophy, and Religion (1994) online edition
• Kuhn, Thomas S. The Copernican revolution: Planetary astronomy in the development of Western thought. (1957).
• Martens, R. Kepler's Philosophy and the New Astronomy (2000).
• North, John. The Fontana History of Astronomy and Cosmology, (1994), pp. 309-26
• Russell, J. L. "Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion: 1609-1666," The British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 2, No. 1 (1964), pp. 1-24 in JSTOR
• Stephenson Charles Bruce. Kepler's Physical Astronomy. Springer-Verlag, 1987.
• Straker, Stephen M. "Kepler, Tycho, and the 'Optical Part of Astronomy': The Genesis of Kepler's Theory of Pinhole Images," Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 24 (1981), 267-93;
• Voelkel, James R. Johannes Kepler and the New Astronomy (2001) excerpt and text search
• Westman, Robert S. "Kepler's Theory of Hypothesis and the 'Realist Dilemma,'" Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 3 (1972), 233-64
• Wilson Curtis. "Kepler's Derivation of the Elliptical Path". Isis 59#1 (1968), 5-25. in JSTOR

Primary sources

• Johannes Kepler, New Astronomy, trans. William H. Donahue (1992),

External links

• David McNamara and Gianfranco Vidali, Kepler's Second Law -JAVA Interactive Tutorial
• short bio from Cambridge University