Talk:Child sexual abuse: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mike Mayors
m ("Effects of sexual abuse" is from Wikipedia)
imported>Mike Mayors
m (Removed category tags - article needs its own workgroup)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{checklist
|                abc = 1 Child Sexual Abuse
|                abc = 1 Child Sexual Abuse
|                cat1 = Child Abuse
|                cat1 =
|                cat2 = Sexual Abuse
|                cat2 =  
|                cat3 =  
|                cat3 =  
|          cat_check = n
|          cat_check = n

Revision as of 10:03, 8 June 2007


Article Checklist for "Child sexual abuse"
Workgroup category or categories No categories listed [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Mike Mayors 10:08, 8 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Fountain pen.png
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page.
I have released a portion of this content on Wikipedia, specifically the section on Child grooming. Therefore, identical text that appears there is my authorship, and no credit for Wikipedia content on Citizendium applies.
Mike Mayors 10:58, 8 June 2007 (CDT)

Hi Mike, don't forget the article checklist here. Also, figure out which workgroups this article belongs in and others may join in! Matt Innis (Talk) 07:35, 8 June 2007 (CDT)

Note: "Effects of child sexual abuse" IS from Wikipedia

I feel it is important to note that the effects of sexual abuse is from Wikipedia. Although I tried to rewrite it entirely, there are some sentences or phrases left unchanged. The citations also remained intact. However, because a lot of the research cited is either controversial or experimental, maybe it can be replaced with more generally-accepted claims? Up to you guys, I just thought the section should be there regardless, so I imported it in.

Is it original

Is any of this from wikipedia? Do we need to check the button? Matt Innis (Talk) 08:09, 8 June 2007 (CDT)

toned down

I toned down the language in the first paragraph to be more inline with the family friendly policies. I am totally aware of all the implications here for accuracy and facing the realities of this atrocity, but I think we can present it without undo explicitness. Matt Innis (Talk) 07:47, 8 June 2007 (CDT)

This article is not from Wikipedia!

Everything with the exception of "Effects of child sexual abuse" is not from wikipedia - it's from research done on Google, or information found on other sites. I went out of my way to completely write from scratch. I apologize for the lack of citations in other areas of the article, I'll try to add them soon. I also apologize for the explicit nature of the introduction paragraph...thx for fixing that. If you have any other problems, PLEASE let me know as I am still new here and don't all the rules/policies...though I think I've read them all. :) Mike Mayors 10:11, 8 June 2007 (CDT)

PS ... how do you sign your name with the "(Talk)" link? The four squiggilies (tildes) only links to my user page...

I think you are doing fine, you just started off with a bang and I have to get you pointed in the right direction quicker than most :) . If the one section is from wikipedia, we might still have to check the box, read the section on new practices from wikipedia. I have to run, but will be back in a minute to give you the (Talk) hint ;-) Matt Innis (Talk) 10:28, 8 June 2007 (CDT)