Talk:Electronic band structure: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews
(Talk page generated using Special:MetadataForm)
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Not especially serious comment ==
While I don't ''think'' disambiguation is needed between physics and music, it idly occurred to me to think of the equivalent of energy levels in heavily electronically assisted music groups. Clearly, a lead vocalist is closer to the nucleus than a backup singer. If Lady Gaga were an electron, she presumably would not shift to a backup band.
Actually, if I think back to when I studied the aufbau of a periodic table consisting of earth, water, fire and air, I remember the term being "electron" levels rather than "electronic". If current expert practice is "electronic", by all means keep it. "Electron", however, might be less ambiguous.
For the record, I know even less about popular music than I do about atomic structure. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 16:59, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:59, 4 January 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The very closely spaced energy levels available to electrons in solids, which are separated from each other by energy gaps. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Physics and Engineering [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Not especially serious comment

While I don't think disambiguation is needed between physics and music, it idly occurred to me to think of the equivalent of energy levels in heavily electronically assisted music groups. Clearly, a lead vocalist is closer to the nucleus than a backup singer. If Lady Gaga were an electron, she presumably would not shift to a backup band.

Actually, if I think back to when I studied the aufbau of a periodic table consisting of earth, water, fire and air, I remember the term being "electron" levels rather than "electronic". If current expert practice is "electronic", by all means keep it. "Electron", however, might be less ambiguous.

For the record, I know even less about popular music than I do about atomic structure. Howard C. Berkowitz 16:59, 4 January 2011 (UTC)