Template:CharterVote2/1/Discussion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis (I agree) |
imported>D. Matt Innis No edit summary |
||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>[[User:D. Matt Innis/CurrentDraft/RevisedStructure|< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE]]<br /></noinclude> | |||
*Registered participants shall be called "Citizens." | *Registered participants shall be called "Citizens." | ||
:I agree with this "Joe's revision from above section" [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 16:47, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | :*I agree with this ("Joe's revision from above section") [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 16:47, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
::That was totally off the top of my head, so I'm not wedded to it if there is a better way to word it. I was thinking maybe: 'Registered contributors shall be called "Citizens".' | |||
::*I would agree to either formulation, but I'm also open to other suggestions. -[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 17:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Maybe even: "Registered users shall be called "Citizens" -[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 17:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::What's the point of the qualifier "Registered?" Will we have participants who are not registered? Try this: [[User:Russell D. Jones|Jones]] 20:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>Collaborators in the Citizendium shall be called "Citizens."</blockquote> | |||
::::I have no problem with that and remain open. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 20:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::::Ooh, I like "collaborators". I inserted "registered" to draw a clear distinction between people who actually join the project and those who partner with us or use our work or whatever; Howard had mentioned something about making such a distinction. If the requirement to be eligible to vote in community referenda and elections is to be a Citizen, it should be very clear where the line is between Citizen and non-Citizen. -[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 00:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
::::::Oh, I see, as in "registered users", duh. I like "collaborators" too, but since so much of our content ends up on WP "collaborators" would mean them too. I'll revert to Joe's formulation. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 15:26, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Registered users shall be called "Citizens". | |||
-[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 17:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)<br /> | |||
Agree. --[[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 15:26, 17 July 2010 (UTC) <br /> | |||
Agree. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 21:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Not convinced that "called" is the best word here. What about "Registered users shall be referred to as Citizens"? --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 22:52, 18 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Good, too. Agree with either [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 00:48, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Okay. agree. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 01:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
::Daniel's is better. Agree to that. [[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 04:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::By the way, [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=User:Tomas_Kindahl&oldid=100690285 Citizendian] has some merit too. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 10:39, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
::::Agree with Daniel's "shall be referred to..." [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 16:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
::::Agree. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 17:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:35, 19 July 2010
- Registered participants shall be called "Citizens."
- I agree with this ("Joe's revision from above section") D. Matt Innis 16:47, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- That was totally off the top of my head, so I'm not wedded to it if there is a better way to word it. I was thinking maybe: 'Registered contributors shall be called "Citizens".'
- I would agree to either formulation, but I'm also open to other suggestions. -Joe Quick 17:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- That was totally off the top of my head, so I'm not wedded to it if there is a better way to word it. I was thinking maybe: 'Registered contributors shall be called "Citizens".'
Collaborators in the Citizendium shall be called "Citizens."
- I have no problem with that and remain open. D. Matt Innis 20:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Ooh, I like "collaborators". I inserted "registered" to draw a clear distinction between people who actually join the project and those who partner with us or use our work or whatever; Howard had mentioned something about making such a distinction. If the requirement to be eligible to vote in community referenda and elections is to be a Citizen, it should be very clear where the line is between Citizen and non-Citizen. -Joe Quick 00:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I see, as in "registered users", duh. I like "collaborators" too, but since so much of our content ends up on WP "collaborators" would mean them too. I'll revert to Joe's formulation. Russell D. Jones 15:26, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Ooh, I like "collaborators". I inserted "registered" to draw a clear distinction between people who actually join the project and those who partner with us or use our work or whatever; Howard had mentioned something about making such a distinction. If the requirement to be eligible to vote in community referenda and elections is to be a Citizen, it should be very clear where the line is between Citizen and non-Citizen. -Joe Quick 00:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- I have no problem with that and remain open. D. Matt Innis 20:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Registered users shall be called "Citizens".
-Joe Quick 17:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Agree. --Russell D. Jones 15:26, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Agree. D. Matt Innis 21:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Not convinced that "called" is the best word here. What about "Registered users shall be referred to as Citizens"? --Daniel Mietchen 22:52, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- Good, too. Agree with either D. Matt Innis 00:48, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Okay. agree. Russell D. Jones 01:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Daniel's is better. Agree to that. Joe Quick 04:21, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, Citizendian has some merit too. --Daniel Mietchen 10:39, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Agree with Daniel's "shall be referred to..." Howard C. Berkowitz 16:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Agree. D. Matt Innis 17:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)