Satanic ritual abuse: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(Removed references not addressing Satanic, but other kinds of abuse)
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
  | date = January 28, 2009 | author = B.A. Robinson
  | date = January 28, 2009 | author = B.A. Robinson
  | url = http://www.religioustolerance.org/sra.htm
  | url = http://www.religioustolerance.org/sra.htm
}}</ref>  
}}</ref>
 
The long list of synonyms confuses the situation, since not all [[cult]]s are Satanic, and not all [[sadism]] is ritualistic or even a group activity. Whether or not a given ritual is abusive is also dependent on context: eating pork is commonplace to billions of people, while forcing a devout Muslim or Jew to eat pork would be abusive. Some cultures believe male [[circumcision]] or [[female genital mutilation]] are quite appropriate, and neither Christianity or Satanism may have anything to do with their beliefs.
    
    
It is of serious concern to some observers such as Gould, who said  "The evidence is rapidly accumulating that the problem of ritual abuse is considerable in scope and extremely grave in its consequences" but did not give quantitative data, as did <ref name=Gould>{{cite journal |last=Gould, C.  
For this reason, one may question the relevance of sources that express concern, but do not use concern to some observers such as Gould, who does not actually describe Satanism other than in passing: "While ritual abuse is certainly an integral part of some kinds of Satanism, it is most likely that the deeper reason for the prevalence of ritual abuse is that, simply put, it reliably creates a group of people who function as unpaid slaves to the perpetrator group" without giving any details of Satanic abuse.  <ref name=Gould>{{cite journal |last=Gould, C.  
  |date=1995   
  |date=1995   
|title=Denying Ritual Abuse of Children  
|title=Denying Ritual Abuse of Children  
|journal=Journal of Psychohistory |volume=22 |issue=3 |pages=328 - 329 |url=http://www.geocities.com/kidhistory/denyra.htm }}</ref> Young's study discussing 37 ritual abuse reports<ref name=Young>{{cite journal |last=Young |first=W.C.  |coauthors=Sachs R.G., Braun B.G., Watkins R.T. |title=Patients reporting ritual abuse in childhood: a clinical syndrome. Report of 37 cases.  |date=1991  |journal=Child Abuse Negl.  |volume=15 |issue=3 |pages=181-189 |url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2043970?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=1&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed  }}</ref>.   
|journal=Journal of Psychohistory |volume=22 |issue=3 |pages=328 - 329 |url=http://www.geocities.com/kidhistory/denyra.htm }}</ref> Young's study does, in the available abstract, "Thirty-seven adult dissociative disorder patients who reported ritual abuse in childhood by satanic cults are described" but there is no further detail on the specifics of the Satanic symbolism or validation beyond patient accounts.<ref name=Young>{{cite journal |last=Young |first=W.C.  |coauthors=Sachs R.G., Braun B.G., Watkins R.T. |title=Patients reporting ritual abuse in childhood: a clinical syndrome. Report of 37 cases.  |date=1991  |journal=Child Abuse Negl.  |volume=15 |issue=3 |pages=181-189 |url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2043970?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=1&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed  }}</ref>.   


One article has termed the [[Wikipedia]] article on the subject a promotion of [[pedophilia]],<ref name=SMART>{{citation  | title = Press Release: Wikipedia “Satanic Ritual Abuse” article promotes PEDOPHILIA
One article has termed the [[Wikipedia]] article on the subject a promotion of [[pedophilia]],<ref name=SMART>{{citation  | title = Press Release: Wikipedia “Satanic Ritual Abuse” article promotes PEDOPHILIA
Line 18: Line 20:
in 1980 in the book, ''Michelle Remembers''. SRA testimonials,
in 1980 in the book, ''Michelle Remembers''. SRA testimonials,
accusations and rumors spread rapidly thereafter in the United States during
accusations and rumors spread rapidly thereafter in the United States during
the early 1980s and then declined rapidly during the early 1990s."  
the early 1980s and then declined rapidly during the early 1990s." <ref name=Victor>{{citation  | title = The Satanic Cult Scare and Allegations of Ritual Child Abuse
<ref name=Victor>{{citation  | title = The Satanic Cult Scare and Allegations of Ritual Child Abuse
  | url = http://www.jstor.org/stable/1389563  | journal = Sociological Perspectives  | volume = 41 | year = 1998  | author = Jeffrey S. Victor | pages =541-565}}, p. 545</ref>  
  | url = http://www.jstor.org/stable/1389563  | journal = Sociological Perspectives  | volume = 41 | year = 1998  | author = Jeffrey S. Victor | pages =541-565}}, p. 545</ref>


The long list of synonyms is a bit confusing, since not all [[cult]]s are Satanic, and not all [[sadism]] is ritualistic or even a group activity. Whether or not a given ritual is abusive is also dependent on context: eating pork is commonplace to billions of people, while forcing a devout Muslim or Jew to eat pork would be abusive. Some cultures believe male [[circumcision]] or [[female genital mutilation]] are quite appropriate, and neither Christianity or Satanism may have anything to do with their beliefs.
He does, however, say <blockquote>So far, no law enforcement agency or research study has found the kind of physical evidence needed to support accounts of SRA. No one has turned up written or electronic communications, bank account records, meetings in process, members who can identify leaders, or any of the vast number of bodies of people supposed murdered by satanic cults. Official government reports from several countries could find no such evidence to support claims about SRA. These reports include those from the [Un
Health of the United Kingdom (La Fontaine 1994); from the Netherlands Ministry
of Justice (1994); from the Behavioral Science Unit of the FBI (Lanning 1992); and
state agencies in Michigan (Michigan State Police 1990), Virginia (Virginia State
Crime Commission Task Force 1991), and Washington (Parr 1996). In addition, a
national survey of psychotherapists could not find a single SRA accusation
reported by the psychotherapists, where there was reliable evidence to corroborate
SRA accusations from either children or adults (Bottoms, Shaver, and Goodman
1996). In the reports of psychotherapists about their patients' SRA accusations, there is no convincing external corroborating evidence for the existence of satanic cult criminals, in either organizations or intergenerational family
clans.</blockquote>
<blockquote>The only social phenomena that exists which bares any resemblance to SRA claims are teenage delinquents and mentally disordered killers who call themselves "satanists". However, these deviants do not constitute an organization, a criminal network or a religious cult. Therefore, in the absence of any scientific evidence to confirm the existence of organized groups that torture and sexually abuse children in satanic rituals, it is reasonable to suggest that the societal reaction to SRA claims has been excessive.<ref>Victor, p. 546</ref></blockquote>


A 1992 report by Kenneth V. Lanning, Supervisory Special Agent, Behavioral Science Unit, National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] said "Most people today use the term  to refer to abuse of children that is part of some evil spiritual belief system, which almost by definition must be satanic." <ref name=Lanning>{{citation
A 1992 report by Kenneth V. Lanning, Supervisory Special Agent, Behavioral Science Unit, National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] said "Most people today use the term  to refer to abuse of children that is part of some evil spiritual belief system, which almost by definition must be satanic." <ref name=Lanning>{{citation

Revision as of 23:00, 22 March 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Satanic ritual abuse (SRA) has been defined as "the psychological, sexual, and/or physical assault forced on an unwilling human victim, and committed by one or more Satanists according to a prescribed ritual, the primary aim of which is to fulfill the need to worship the Christian devil, Satan. The same source refers to it as synonymous for cult related abuse, ritual abuse, ritualized abuse, sadistic ritual abuse and organized sadistic abuse[1]

The long list of synonyms confuses the situation, since not all cults are Satanic, and not all sadism is ritualistic or even a group activity. Whether or not a given ritual is abusive is also dependent on context: eating pork is commonplace to billions of people, while forcing a devout Muslim or Jew to eat pork would be abusive. Some cultures believe male circumcision or female genital mutilation are quite appropriate, and neither Christianity or Satanism may have anything to do with their beliefs.

For this reason, one may question the relevance of sources that express concern, but do not use concern to some observers such as Gould, who does not actually describe Satanism other than in passing: "While ritual abuse is certainly an integral part of some kinds of Satanism, it is most likely that the deeper reason for the prevalence of ritual abuse is that, simply put, it reliably creates a group of people who function as unpaid slaves to the perpetrator group" without giving any details of Satanic abuse. [2] Young's study does, in the available abstract, "Thirty-seven adult dissociative disorder patients who reported ritual abuse in childhood by satanic cults are described" but there is no further detail on the specifics of the Satanic symbolism or validation beyond patient accounts.[3].

One article has termed the Wikipedia article on the subject a promotion of pedophilia,[4] while others regard it as a moral panic or as a subversion ideology.[5] Victor observed "The rapid rise and decline of SRA accusations gives evidence to the volatility of a moral panic. Claims about ritual child abuse by satanic cults began to appear rather suddenly. The oldest known satanic cult "survivor" account was published in 1980 in the book, Michelle Remembers. SRA testimonials, accusations and rumors spread rapidly thereafter in the United States during the early 1980s and then declined rapidly during the early 1990s." [6]

He does, however, say

So far, no law enforcement agency or research study has found the kind of physical evidence needed to support accounts of SRA. No one has turned up written or electronic communications, bank account records, meetings in process, members who can identify leaders, or any of the vast number of bodies of people supposed murdered by satanic cults. Official government reports from several countries could find no such evidence to support claims about SRA. These reports include those from the [Un

Health of the United Kingdom (La Fontaine 1994); from the Netherlands Ministry of Justice (1994); from the Behavioral Science Unit of the FBI (Lanning 1992); and state agencies in Michigan (Michigan State Police 1990), Virginia (Virginia State Crime Commission Task Force 1991), and Washington (Parr 1996). In addition, a national survey of psychotherapists could not find a single SRA accusation reported by the psychotherapists, where there was reliable evidence to corroborate SRA accusations from either children or adults (Bottoms, Shaver, and Goodman 1996). In the reports of psychotherapists about their patients' SRA accusations, there is no convincing external corroborating evidence for the existence of satanic cult criminals, in either organizations or intergenerational family

clans.

The only social phenomena that exists which bares any resemblance to SRA claims are teenage delinquents and mentally disordered killers who call themselves "satanists". However, these deviants do not constitute an organization, a criminal network or a religious cult. Therefore, in the absence of any scientific evidence to confirm the existence of organized groups that torture and sexually abuse children in satanic rituals, it is reasonable to suggest that the societal reaction to SRA claims has been excessive.[7]

A 1992 report by Kenneth V. Lanning, Supervisory Special Agent, Behavioral Science Unit, National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, Federal Bureau of Investigation said "Most people today use the term to refer to abuse of children that is part of some evil spiritual belief system, which almost by definition must be satanic." [8] Williams observes that the definition is especially difficult for law enforcement. Ritual with a child is not necessarily abusive; rites of passage such as First Communions, Bar Mitzvahs, and other coming-of-age ceremonies are ritual by definition.

References

  1. B.A. Robinson (January 28, 2009), Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA), Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance
  2. Gould, C. (1995). "Denying Ritual Abuse of Children". Journal of Psychohistory 22 (3): 328 - 329.
  3. Young, W.C.; Sachs R.G., Braun B.G., Watkins R.T. (1991). "Patients reporting ritual abuse in childhood: a clinical syndrome. Report of 37 cases.". Child Abuse Negl. 15 (3): 181-189.
  4. S.M.A.R.T., Press Release: Wikipedia “Satanic Ritual Abuse” article promotes PEDOPHILIA
  5. Mary deYoung, Sociological Views on the Controversial Issue of Satanic Ritual Abuse: Three Faces of the Devil, American Academy of Experts in Traumatic Stress
  6. Jeffrey S. Victor (1998), "The Satanic Cult Scare and Allegations of Ritual Child Abuse", Sociological Perspectives 41: 541-565, p. 545
  7. Victor, p. 546
  8. Kenneth V. Lanning, 1992 FBI Report: Satanic Ritual Abuse, Behavioral Science Unit, National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, Federal Bureau of Investigation