CZ Talk:Editorial Council Resolution 0011/Vote: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa
(Explanation for my vote)
 
imported>J. Noel Chiappa
m (Typos)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Explanation for my vote==
==Explanation for my vote==
I'm not in general opposed to the concept of per-WG guidance (e.g. for the presentation of specialized data that only that WG would have). However... I am very concerned that individual WGs not develop guidelines that make 'their' articles look different from the rest of the encyclopaedia, and while I expect that the resolution proponents share that, I don't think the resolution states that stronglyl enough. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 10:44, 4 July 2008 (CDT)
I'm not in general opposed to the concept of per-WG guidance (e.g. for the presentation of specialized data that only that WG would have). However... I am very concerned that individual WGs not develop guidelines that make 'their' articles look different from the rest of the encyclopaedia, and while I expect that the resolution proponents share that view, I don't think the resolution states that strongly enough. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 10:44, 4 July 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 07:50, 7 July 2008

Explanation for my vote

I'm not in general opposed to the concept of per-WG guidance (e.g. for the presentation of specialized data that only that WG would have). However... I am very concerned that individual WGs not develop guidelines that make 'their' articles look different from the rest of the encyclopaedia, and while I expect that the resolution proponents share that view, I don't think the resolution states that strongly enough. J. Noel Chiappa 10:44, 4 July 2008 (CDT)