Talk:Dokdo (Takeshima)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Tom Kelly
imported>Chunbum Park
Line 13: Line 13:


I think your images are fine.  I am not an expert but I would definitely but also upset if someone protested their validity.  I don't see how they can be copy-righted if you drew them yourself. [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 22:28, 28 May 2008 (CDT)
I think your images are fine.  I am not an expert but I would definitely but also upset if someone protested their validity.  I don't see how they can be copy-righted if you drew them yourself. [[User:Tom Kelly|Tom Kelly]] 22:28, 28 May 2008 (CDT)
:thank you ! : ) especially for maps, I think "referencing" is fine. I remember how map publishers research on previously published maps to make new editions but they're not copyrighted & at the same time they're "derivative work"s. ([[User:Chunbum Park|Chunbum Park]] 09:27, 29 May 2008 (CDT))

Revision as of 09:27, 29 May 2008

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Gallery [?]
Debate Guide [?]
 

Naming

Take a look at CZ Talk:Naming Conventions#naming is separate from neutrality, only based on common use? - the article title name was decided with this discussion. (Chunbum Park 09:18, 9 May 2008 (CDT))

good job. Richard Jensen 14:18, 10 May 2008 (CDT)
thank you. (Chunbum Park 14:23, 10 May 2008 (CDT))

note on propaganda sounding sources

We'll use them only for statistics (i.e. coordinates, rainfall, Japanese names, Korean names). Contents that advocate for Japanese or Korean side should be used only to detail the arguments that each side is making. (Chunbum Park 14:13, 26 May 2008 (CDT))

i think your images are fine

I think your images are fine. I am not an expert but I would definitely but also upset if someone protested their validity. I don't see how they can be copy-righted if you drew them yourself. Tom Kelly 22:28, 28 May 2008 (CDT)

thank you ! : ) especially for maps, I think "referencing" is fine. I remember how map publishers research on previously published maps to make new editions but they're not copyrighted & at the same time they're "derivative work"s. (Chunbum Park 09:27, 29 May 2008 (CDT))