Talk:Archive:Media Credit Lines within Articles: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen
imported>Stephen Ewen
Line 15: Line 15:


===Orphans and embarrassing source===
===Orphans and embarrassing source===
[[Image:Prototype_of_Tux_Linux_Penguin.jpg|right|70px|thumb|I'm an orphan!]]
[[Image:Johannes_Diderik_van_der_Waals_photographic_portrait.jpg|right|70px|thumb|I'm an orphan!]]
;Orphans
;Orphans
Calling some media "orphaned" ''is'' the professional thing to do.  What WP does with orphaned works is take a position on the matter!  That is atrocious and helps kill their credibility about media.  It also induces potential liability!   
Calling some media "orphaned" ''is'' the professional thing to do.  What WP does with orphaned works is take a position on the matter!  That is atrocious and helps kill their credibility about media.  It also induces potential liability!   
Line 22: Line 24:
*From [http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/ The U.S. Copyright office]
*From [http://www.copyright.gov/orphan/ The U.S. Copyright office]
*[http://www.law.duke.edu/cspd/orphanworks.html Duke Law]
*[http://www.law.duke.edu/cspd/orphanworks.html Duke Law]
*[http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/ow Really good background info on the matter]


Orphaned works (see two examples to the right) are the perfect case to make a fair use claim, ''after'' one shows and documents reasonable diligence in locating the copyright holder.  Every authority is unanimous on that.  I have gone to efforts to create a few cases of this on CZ, for illustrative purposes.   
Two examples of orphaned works are to the right.  Orphaned works are the perfect case where a fair use claim is very strong, ''after'' one shows and documents reasonable diligence in locating the copyright holder.  Every authority is unanimous on that.  I have thus gone to efforts to create two cases of this on CZ, for illustrative purposes (see examples to the right).  Without occasional use of such works, the value of the encyclopedia would be sadly and needlessly diminished.  When we find works to be orphaned, a determination that can only be made after seeking permission with considerable diligence, ''we call the works what they are''.   
[[Image:Prototype_of_Tux_Linux_Penguin.jpg|right|70px]]
[[Image:Johannes_Diderik_van_der_Waals_photographic_portrait.jpg|right|70px]]
 
These are, in fact, orphaned works, without the use of which the value to the encyclopedia would be sadly and needlessly diminished.  When we find works to be orphaned, a determination that can only be made after seeking permission with considerable diligence, ''we call the works what they are''.   


;"When obtained from sources that might lower the prestigiousness of CZ"  
;"When obtained from sources that might lower the prestigiousness of CZ"  
This is a clause meant to appease certain parties about Google Books.  But there are other instance I'll write more on later.  I gotta run right now.
This is a clause meant to appease certain parties about Google Books, and the like.


[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 13:45, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 13:45, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 14:44, 20 October 2007

[[Image:U2 Live in Toronto 2005 (3).jpg|right|thumb|360px| {|align="right" | <div style="position:relative; top: -1px"><font style="color: rgb(65, 65, 65);"><small>Photo: Metropolitan Art Museum</small></font><BR> |} This is how credit lines appear. Note how the text is gray. This is how credit lines appear. Note how the text is gray. This is how credit lines appear. Note how the text is gray. This is how credit lines appear. Note how the text is gray. This is how credit lines appear. Note how the text is gray.</div>]]

Orphans—when provenance cannot be ascertained

Looks very bad. What are we, Wikipedia? If we aren't willing to take a stand on the licensing status of media, we shouldn't use it, period. --Larry Sanger 08:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

"When obtained from sources that might lower the prestigiousness of CZ" -- what's an example? --Larry Sanger 08:26, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

Tabloids? --Robert W King 08:30, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
But they're not public domain. --Larry Sanger 08:35, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
Oh, PD? In that case I really can't think of any that might fit the bill, unless there's some obscure 19th-century "romance novel"... --Robert W King 08:38, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

Orphans and embarrassing source

I'm an orphan!
I'm an orphan!
Orphans

Calling some media "orphaned" is the professional thing to do. What WP does with orphaned works is take a position on the matter! That is atrocious and helps kill their credibility about media. It also induces potential liability!

"Orphaned works" is not some contrived category of mine. It is the category assigned by the professional world of archivists and so forth to describe media whose provenance cannot be ascertained. Here's some info from:

Two examples of orphaned works are to the right. Orphaned works are the perfect case where a fair use claim is very strong, after one shows and documents reasonable diligence in locating the copyright holder. Every authority is unanimous on that. I have thus gone to efforts to create two cases of this on CZ, for illustrative purposes (see examples to the right). Without occasional use of such works, the value of the encyclopedia would be sadly and needlessly diminished. When we find works to be orphaned, a determination that can only be made after seeking permission with considerable diligence, we call the works what they are.

"When obtained from sources that might lower the prestigiousness of CZ"

This is a clause meant to appease certain parties about Google Books, and the like.

Stephen Ewen 13:45, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Archive:Media_Credit_Lines_within_Articles&oldid=307687"