Talk:Child sexual abuse: Difference between revisions
imported>Mike Mayors m (Removed category tags - article needs its own workgroup) |
imported>D. Matt Innis (let editors or Editor in Chief decide) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| cat2 = | | cat2 = | ||
| cat3 = | | cat3 = | ||
| cat_check = | | cat_check = y | ||
| status = 2 | | status = 2 | ||
| underlinked = y | | underlinked = y |
Revision as of 10:09, 8 June 2007
Workgroup category or categories | No categories listed [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Mike Mayors 10:08, 8 June 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. | |
I have released a portion of this content on Wikipedia, specifically the section on Child grooming. Therefore, identical text that appears there is my authorship, and no credit for Wikipedia content on Citizendium applies. | |
Mike Mayors 10:58, 8 June 2007 (CDT) |
Hi Mike, don't forget the article checklist here. Also, figure out which workgroups this article belongs in and others may join in! Matt Innis (Talk) 07:35, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
Note: "Effects of child sexual abuse" IS from Wikipedia
I feel it is important to note that the effects of sexual abuse is from Wikipedia. Although I tried to rewrite it entirely, there are some sentences or phrases left unchanged. The citations also remained intact. However, because a lot of the research cited is either controversial or experimental, maybe it can be replaced with more generally-accepted claims? Up to you guys, I just thought the section should be there regardless, so I imported it in.
Is it original
Is any of this from wikipedia? Do we need to check the button? Matt Innis (Talk) 08:09, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
toned down
I toned down the language in the first paragraph to be more inline with the family friendly policies. I am totally aware of all the implications here for accuracy and facing the realities of this atrocity, but I think we can present it without undo explicitness. Matt Innis (Talk) 07:47, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
This article is not from Wikipedia!
Everything with the exception of "Effects of child sexual abuse" is not from wikipedia - it's from research done on Google, or information found on other sites. I went out of my way to completely write from scratch. I apologize for the lack of citations in other areas of the article, I'll try to add them soon. I also apologize for the explicit nature of the introduction paragraph...thx for fixing that. If you have any other problems, PLEASE let me know as I am still new here and don't all the rules/policies...though I think I've read them all. :) Mike Mayors 10:11, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
PS ... how do you sign your name with the "(Talk)" link? The four squiggilies (tildes) only links to my user page...
- I think you are doing fine, you just started off with a bang and I have to get you pointed in the right direction quicker than most :) . If the one section is from wikipedia, we might still have to check the box, read the section on new practices from wikipedia. I have to run, but will be back in a minute to give you the (Talk) hint ;-) Matt Innis (Talk) 10:28, 8 June 2007 (CDT)