Talk:Fence plowing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Fred Bauder (Some issues) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
==Issues== | ==Issues== | ||
#Does this article belong here at all? It is fun to write and to read, but it is possibly quite ephemeral. Hard to imagine fence plowing being an on-going fad. | #Does this article belong here at all? It is fun to write and to read, but it is possibly quite ephemeral. Hard to imagine fence plowing being an on-going fad. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
#Who is the expert who would review or approve such an article? | #Who is the expert who would review or approve such an article? | ||
[[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 13:53, 18 February 2007 (CST) | [[User:Fred Bauder|Fred Bauder]] 13:53, 18 February 2007 (CST) | ||
: the first and the last question could probably be answered by the Sociology Workgroup, which is proposed as the "supervisor" for the article. --[[User:Aleksander Stos|AlekStos]] 07:43, 10 March 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 26 September 2007
Issues
- Does this article belong here at all? It is fun to write and to read, but it is possibly quite ephemeral. Hard to imagine fence plowing being an on-going fad.
- The link to the video clip of the Fox News interview is questionable. I couldn't find the story on the Fox New site, perhaps on the local Channel 5 site.
- No link to the New York Times articles as after 2 weeks they charge for access.
- Who is the expert who would review or approve such an article?
Fred Bauder 13:53, 18 February 2007 (CST)
- the first and the last question could probably be answered by the Sociology Workgroup, which is proposed as the "supervisor" for the article. --AlekStos 07:43, 10 March 2007 (CST)