Talk:Tony Blair/Bibliography

Wow, when one sees a Bibiography subpage constructed--the value is clearly outstanding. What a fantastic starting point for in-depth research this is.  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 00:38, 12 August 2007 (CDT)

Yes, I had the same thought. An annotated bibliography, particularly when it's online and has hyperlinks to things like online copies and reviews, is a great research tool. This isn't exactly news, but it does bring home the value of what we're doing.

I predict we will have similar reactions to fully fleshed out "Related Articles" pages. --Larry Sanger 01:42, 12 August 2007 (CDT)

Bear in mind--at least some "Primary Sources" would live under "Written Works" subpages, under our subpages scheme. I'm open to argument on this. If we should consolidate all external content, whether books, articles, or webpages, and whether primary or secondary sources, on one page, then this page is fine as it is. But I think a useful distinction can be made between (1) External Links (i.e., websites that are useful, but which are not necessarily "the leading research" on a subject), (2) Bibliography (the leading research), and (3) Written Works (writings of the subject of a biography). --Larry Sanger 01:46, 12 August 2007 (CDT)