Talk:Chain rule
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
In line with the following,
- ,
I would write for pedagogical reasons:
and that
reads in Leibniz (traditional) notation,
- .
What do you think? --Paul Wormer 09:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'ld be happy for you to add that, but I want to state the simple dz/dy.dy/dx not because I approve of it, but precisely because I don't: that is, I want to explain it. Richard Pinch 11:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)