Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- ...ainst enemy radars, rather than the escort/self-defense mode of the U.K. [[BaE Systems ALARM]] and U.S. [[AGM-88 HARM]]236 bytes (32 words) - 21:01, 29 September 2008
- {{r|BaE Systems ALARM}}622 bytes (81 words) - 19:20, 11 January 2010
- {{r|BaE Systems ALARM}}565 bytes (80 words) - 05:21, 31 March 2024
- {{r|BaE Systems ALARM}}672 bytes (86 words) - 14:14, 6 April 2024
- {{r|BaE Systems ALARM}}1 KB (141 words) - 08:51, 20 March 2024
- {{r|BaE Systems ALARM}}1,017 bytes (137 words) - 08:58, 19 April 2024
- {{r|BaE Systems ALARM}}1 KB (166 words) - 08:34, 22 April 2024
- {{r|BaE Systems ALARM}}2 KB (305 words) - 14:13, 6 April 2024
- ...an fire the AGM-88 HARM. The Saudi and British ground attack versions fire BaE Systems ALARM.13 KB (2,090 words) - 18:47, 3 April 2024
- ...radar very quickly, as opposed to the mixed soft-hard kill of the British BaE Systems ALARM. ALARM will strike a radar if one is active, but, otherwise, it dangles on30 KB (4,571 words) - 06:56, 4 April 2024
- ...ssile. The Armat has a different niche than other ARMs such as the British BaE Systems ALARM and U.S. AGM-88 HARM. It has an especially large warhead, intended princip12 KB (1,802 words) - 18:47, 3 April 2024
- ...munitions, including specialized air defense weapons such as the British BaE Systems ALARM anti-radiation missile and the less successful JP233 runway denial clust56 KB (8,444 words) - 07:02, 4 April 2024