Talk:V (letter): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert W King
No edit summary
imported>Ro Thorpe
Line 12: Line 12:


:I think we should have just one article on [[Roman numerals]].  It doesn't make any sense to create seperate articles for "M", "C", "X", "V", "I", "L", "Q". --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 11:06, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
:I think we should have just one article on [[Roman numerals]].  It doesn't make any sense to create seperate articles for "M", "C", "X", "V", "I", "L", "Q". --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 11:06, 1 April 2008 (CDT)
Right, I'l make adjustments accordingly. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 11:08, 1 April 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:08, 1 April 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The twenty-second letter of the English alphabet. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Linguistics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Roman numerals

Should we disambiguate pages like this given they could also be Roman numerals? C, D, I, M and I would also need these. John Stephenson 03:08, 1 April 2008 (CDT)

The Roman numerals would go fine in the intro. However, I think we really need two articles here, as what you have added is about the sound. A separate article on /v/ (sound) with a link from the letter article? (I tried putting the phonetic square brackets in there but it didn't work, so I substituted the phonemic //). Ro Thorpe 08:54, 1 April 2008 (CDT)

OK, maybe /v/ (phoneme) would be better. John Stephenson 09:03, 1 April 2008 (CDT)

Yes, fine. Ro Thorpe 09:28, 1 April 2008 (CDT)

See V (disambiguation). --Robert W King 09:35, 1 April 2008 (CDT)

So are we going to have articles on the Roman numerals or just mention them in the introductions to the ones I started? Ro Thorpe 10:59, 1 April 2008 (CDT)

I think we should have just one article on Roman numerals. It doesn't make any sense to create seperate articles for "M", "C", "X", "V", "I", "L", "Q". --Robert W King 11:06, 1 April 2008 (CDT)

Right, I'l make adjustments accordingly. Ro Thorpe 11:08, 1 April 2008 (CDT)