Talk:United States Constitution: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Petréa Mitchell
(Big Cleanup checklist)
imported>Steve Mount
(Added "main article" blurb.)
Line 10: Line 10:
|                  by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]]
|                  by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]]
}}
}}
=="Main Article"==
It is common on Wikipedia to do as I've done on this page and have "Main Article blah blah" for something treated from a high level, like Article 1.  Any opinions on whether it is better to create a "main article" to discuss Article 1 in more detail, or to discuss it in more detail on this page? [[User:Steve Mount|steve802]] 22:54, 1 April 2007 (CDT)


==Dates==
==Dates==


I guess this is less a question about this article than it is about CZ in general - it is common Wikipedia practice to linkify dates and years. Is this discouraged in CZ?  Also, is there a standard date format?  I see some in this article were added as DD MMM YYYY, and some of my original entries are in MMM DD, YYYY format.  ([[User:Steve Mount|steve802]] 12:16, 2 March 2007 (CST))
I guess this is less a question about this article than it is about CZ in general - it is common Wikipedia practice to linkify dates and years. Is this discouraged in CZ?  Also, is there a standard date format?  I see some in this article were added as DD MMM YYYY, and some of my original entries are in MMM DD, YYYY format.  ([[User:Steve Mount|steve802]] 12:16, 2 March 2007 (CST))

Revision as of 22:54, 1 April 2007


Article Checklist for "United States Constitution"
Workgroup category or categories Politics Workgroup, History Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





"Main Article"

It is common on Wikipedia to do as I've done on this page and have "Main Article blah blah" for something treated from a high level, like Article 1. Any opinions on whether it is better to create a "main article" to discuss Article 1 in more detail, or to discuss it in more detail on this page? steve802 22:54, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Dates

I guess this is less a question about this article than it is about CZ in general - it is common Wikipedia practice to linkify dates and years. Is this discouraged in CZ? Also, is there a standard date format? I see some in this article were added as DD MMM YYYY, and some of my original entries are in MMM DD, YYYY format. (steve802 12:16, 2 March 2007 (CST))