Talk:Natural language: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(==Purpose of this article==)
imported>John Stephenson
(purpose - should be more to do with computation and artificial languages, otherwise it overlaps too much with language)
Line 15: Line 15:
==Purpose of this article==
==Purpose of this article==
It seems that a lot of this overlaps with other articles such as [[Linguistics]]. When I think of the phrase 'natural language', the links with computational linguistics and constructed/artificial languages come to mind. I think this should be emphasised; other passages could be moved elsewhere. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 04:34, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
It seems that a lot of this overlaps with other articles such as [[Linguistics]]. When I think of the phrase 'natural language', the links with computational linguistics and constructed/artificial languages come to mind. I think this should be emphasised; other passages could be moved elsewhere. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 04:34, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
:I still think this, for the record. :-) In my experience of linguistics, 'natural language' is only ever used in reference to computation and artificial language. I think this article should emphasise these two fields. The rest can go on [[language]] - rewritten so it's not from Wikipedia. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 19:44, 31 October 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 19:44, 31 October 2007


Article Checklist for "Natural language"
Workgroup category or categories Linguistics Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Pat Palmer 00:06, 14 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






Purpose of this article

It seems that a lot of this overlaps with other articles such as Linguistics. When I think of the phrase 'natural language', the links with computational linguistics and constructed/artificial languages come to mind. I think this should be emphasised; other passages could be moved elsewhere. John Stephenson 04:34, 14 May 2007 (CDT)

I still think this, for the record. :-) In my experience of linguistics, 'natural language' is only ever used in reference to computation and artificial language. I think this article should emphasise these two fields. The rest can go on language - rewritten so it's not from Wikipedia. John Stephenson 19:44, 31 October 2007 (CDT)