Talk:Generative linguistics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer
(more detail to Article Checklist)
imported>Sandy Harris
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Linguistics, Generative
 
|                cat1 = Linguistics
== Critiques? Attacks? ==
|                cat2 =  
 
|                cat3 =  
I think we need to add some information on critiques of generative linguistics. It has been extremely influential, but it is far from universally accepted. There are other styles of linguistic work; Halliday and company leap to my mind, but an expert could likely think of more.
|          cat_check = y
 
|              status = 4
Also, there has been controversy between generativists and natural language AI workers. Dresher & Hornstein "On Some Supposed Contributions of Artificial Intelligence to the Scientific Study of Language". Cognition 4 (December):321-398 and the rebuttal by Terry Winograd, (1977), "On some contested suppositions of generative linguistics about the scientific study of language," Cognition 5, 1977, 151-179 are a fine example. There were several other papers in that debate, including one by Lakoff. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 05:41, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup =
|                  by = [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 00:05, 7 April 2007 (CDT)
}}

Latest revision as of 00:41, 20 October 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  School of thought within linguistics that makes use of the concept of a generative grammar. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Linguistics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Critiques? Attacks?

I think we need to add some information on critiques of generative linguistics. It has been extremely influential, but it is far from universally accepted. There are other styles of linguistic work; Halliday and company leap to my mind, but an expert could likely think of more.

Also, there has been controversy between generativists and natural language AI workers. Dresher & Hornstein "On Some Supposed Contributions of Artificial Intelligence to the Scientific Study of Language". Cognition 4 (December):321-398 and the rebuttal by Terry Winograd, (1977), "On some contested suppositions of generative linguistics about the scientific study of language," Cognition 5, 1977, 151-179 are a fine example. There were several other papers in that debate, including one by Lakoff. Sandy Harris 05:41, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Generative_linguistics&oldid=23129"