Talk:Chase Osborn: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt (→On the deletion request: new section) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (→On the deletion request: delete a developed article?) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
What is the problem with this article? It seems to be informative enough, even compared to the WP article. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 17:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC) | What is the problem with this article? It seems to be informative enough, even compared to the WP article. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 17:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Russell, as I see you classified the article a 1 = developed -- hardly a candidate for deletion. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 17:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:28, 4 April 2011
Started and Done?
Okay, I've shot my bolt on Osborn here. I can't think of anything more that needs to be added. The article needs some formatting and copy-editing. But I can't think of any more content to add. You? Russell D. Jones 02:10, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
On the deletion request
The EC regulation on inclusion policy does not authorize speedy deletes. It requires four weeks during that the request can be contested.
What is the problem with this article? It seems to be informative enough, even compared to the WP article. --Peter Schmitt 17:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Russell, as I see you classified the article a 1 = developed -- hardly a candidate for deletion. --Peter Schmitt 17:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Developed Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Politics Developed Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Politics Underlinked Articles
- History tag