Search results

| ok | ok

ok; {ok,catch_it}

1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, OK, that killed 168 people (including 19 children) and wounded more than 700.

The [[U.S. Courts of Appeals|U.S. Court of Appeals]] for CO, KA, NM, OK, UT, and WY, located in [[Denver, Colorado|Denver]].

*{{cite web |url=http://www.goodiesruleok.com |title=The Goodies Rule - OK! Fan Club |accessdate=2009-06-08 |format= |work= }}

{ok,"1001",1}

% ok. % your 4.00000 secs are up.ok

{ok,art} % {ok,art}

.... Bullin, Proceedings of the Seventy-First GPA Annual Convention, [[Tulsa, OK]], 1992, pp 310-317. An excellent discussion on the design details of glyco

1> ok. ok

*<code> {ok, A} = {ok, 42}. </code> *<code>{ok, A} = {failure, "Don't know the question"}.</code>

after T -> ok {ok,trap_exit_test}

{ok, Dictionary}. ok.

...U.S. Congressional Representative]]([[Republican Party (United States)|R-]]OK), [[Republican Study Committee]] ...U.S. Congressional Representative]]([[Republican Party (United States)|R-]]OK), [[Republican Study Committee]]

Ok. I'm going to start on the educational technology part of this. Any help wo

{ok,L} = html_parser:parse(List_of_symbols), % {ok,html_test}

...nweb/ok/caddo/cemeteries/plsntvew.txt Pleasant View Cemetery, Caddo County OK]</ref>]] {{coord|35|00|54|N|98|26|40|W|type:city_region:US-OK|display=title}}

* {{search link|ok||ns0|ns14|ns100}} (OK, okay)

Notice that approval includes a copyedit by Milton Beychok that was ok'd by David on the talk page. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 23:05,

# Click OK when a dialog box appears informing you of the storage requirements for the # Click OK on the Languages tab.

...use material from Wikipedia or other sources, but wholesale copying is not OK.

ok {ok, _} = Found,

::As such looks OK to me. However, if Robert can make it better, that'd be most welcome. [[Use

...'''both''' the preview and the code as submitted from a preview that looks ok. ...the opinion of the person filling out the checklist, the category list is OK or, instead, needs review by editors. Simply write 'y' or 'n' (or variation

: No, it's quite ok. I would have done it, too. I only added the links so that these pages are

:::::It works! This is great work. I will fix the instructions. Ok if: ::::::2. Ok that I edited [[Template:Navpop]] to call your js rather than WP's http://e

{ok,iter} {ok,giter}

...History of the 49th State|publisher=University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK|id=ISBN 0-8061-2099-1}}

...e for the specialist Sanskrit terminology of the Gita, Sargeant/Chapple is OK, though the grammatical notes are emphatically to be avoided. A slow, compa

true -> ok %{ok,freeze_clone}

{{r|Tom Cole}} ([[Republican Party (United States)|R-]]OK); [[Congressional Rural Healthcare Coalition]] {{r|Mary Fallin}} ([[Republican Party (United States)|R-]]OK); [[Congressional Rural Healthcare Coalition]]

...Of The Spanish Borderlands|publisher=University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK|id=ISBN 0-8061-2317-6}}

...pwards in Europe and Latin America, especially Brazil, means "everything's OK", while it is understood in Islamic countries as a rude sexual sign. ** "Everything OK" is shown in western European countries, especially between pilots and dive

...hat needed to be presented, and how, and in what order, from that thread.) OK, fine, one might say, we clearly neeeded a lot more text, and better organi

{{r|John Sullivan}} [[Committee on Energy and Commerce]] OK

HTTP/1.1 200 OK

...controlled trial]].<ref name="pmid15955148">{{cite journal |author=Basoglu OK, Atasever A, Bacakoglu F |title=The efficacy of incentive spirometry in pat

% ok

{ok,simple}

S: 250 2.1.0 <xxxx@example.com>... Sender ok S: 250 2.1.5 <yyyy@example.com>... Recipient ok

...Technically you can't use it, but I imagine it wouldn't be hard to get an OK to use it. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 07:22, 24 May 2008 (CDT

|'''STEP 1. Create the "metadata template."'''<br>It's OK, you don't need to know what this means. :-)

...Star Cluster cluster. Or the General Custer cluster. Otherwise seems to be OK. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 22:58, 27 July

...rticle you want to edit, press the "edit" tab. Add a few sentences. It's OK. They just have to be a helpful addition.

* [[CZ:Neutrality Policy]] - review Gareth's abbreviated version; if OK, edit and upload to main page :::OK... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:25, 21 February 2008 (CST)

% ok

domainkeys=pass (ok); from=example.com; dkim=pass (ok)

{ok,util}

...ll suffice, and precise birthdays should also be excluded (birth years are OK). Delete any school and town information as well. 4) Ok, that's the end of the sorting. Now to the wiki. Go to the wiki and log on.

if an article could use mutiple things defined, is that ok? ...", i.e. "<nowiki>Capital of the German state [[Saxony]]</nowiki>". Is that OK? -- [[User:Alexander Wiebel|Alexander Wiebel]] 12:52, 16 May 2008 (CDT)

{ok,jungle}

...its way'' to being a good summation of the topic. The editor offers this OK [[#The Topics|below]]. :OK’d:

...about how she came to trust in the cosmos that life was going to turn out OK.

'''STEP 1. Create the "metadata template."''' It's OK, you don't need to know what this means. :-)

...er Construction]]''' - This is a new wiki. Things aren't perfect. That's OK--for now.

...Of The Spanish Borderlands|publisher=University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK|id=ISBN 0-8061-2317-6}}

...de) quadruped). I need to discuss this directly with the authors if thats ok with other editors. Also, parts - which I've touched on in edits - are cle

...below didn't need to be accounted for when destroyed, those burn bags were OK with food, hence the order.

::OK. No more approved articles, no more disambigs. Please note that the dismbig ::Ok, now it's sorted by age (<s>according to Special:Ancientpages</s>creation d

:OK. I replied to other points on Larry's talk page about this back-of-an-envel

OK...re [[Image:The Lads.jpg]], it says it's copyrighted; did we get permissio

::OK, we have 99 and no-one else has added anything. We may as well quit here. [

:: Clustering sounds like a very sound idea to me. However, a large page is ok also if we include "Back to Top" links to easily get back to the TOC listin ...top links are always good. My comment was directed at the "a large page is ok also if" part. I was just concerned that a huge page would give people the

<!--OK, it's kinda short, but it'll get there--!>

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: *[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] started [[Interspike Interval Histogram]]. OK, not a bestseller, and edited [[John Snow (physician)]] and [[Nitroglycerin

...n come back later and fix it (or let others fix it)? I think it should be OK though not encouraged. If exceptions do arise, things like comments in the

...ts" goes to "Top accomplishments since start". Some of the other links are OK. Is there an error in the template? [[User:Mark Jones|Mark Jones]] 11:47, 2

...isn't an article, therefore it doesn't belong in the main namespace. It's OK if it's in the CZ: namespace. That fact alone doesn't make it "official po

...awa County, MI|Michigan]], [[Ottawa County, OH|Ohio]] and [[Ottawa County, OK|Oklahoma]]. She served as a commissioned ship for 23 months.

...pear to discuss an exactly parallel case, with everyone agreeing that it's OK for David to refer to that paper. ...dium does not have an article on the "History of the Internet." Then it is OK for you to start a new (i.e. previously unpublished) article for Citizendiu

Seems like a hard question. OK, first thing: we're going to move the Notice Board to the top of a revamped OK, then the question is: what is linked-to from CZ:Home? [[CZ:Project Home]]

...that the writer would try a few values of the parameter to see what looks OK. --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 13:29, 12 May 2007 (CDT)

:: OK, here it goes. I hope that's what you requested. But do not hesitate to po : Thanks for the hint. Well, for the global word count I think it's OK to do as you suggest and, clearly, the drafts should be simply excluded any

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: **OK, now I'm in [[Ohio (U.S. state)|Ohio]] in two ways! --[[User:Larry Sanger|L

:::::(I know, I know, I'm not quite following the Comment Commandments). OK; I see that number. Accuracy is a question; I happened to look at the list ::::OK, I won't feel guilty if I do metadata on some of your new articles. Rest as

...lfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, [[Oklahoma (U.S. state)|OK]] on April 19, 1995, killing 168 people (including 19 children) and woundin | url = http://www.ok.gov/OEM/documents/Bombing%20After%20Action%20Report.pdf

* Editors (and authors), it's all the more OK for you to ''comment'' on someone else's text, on the talk page.

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: ...Fourier‎]] (3b, tiny edit), and [[Stephen Jay Gould‎]] (4b, linkifying). OK, came back and started [[argument (logic)]] only to realize that it had alr

...such a wonderful time. Look, we had a framework for 'In My Time Of Dying', Ok, but then it just takes off and we're just doing what Led Zeppelin do. We'r

*89er Stage Race (Norman, OK) &mdash; 1st place, 2 stage victories

'''ÔK''' = '''ôkây''' (but "ok" is not okay) = '''[[Okeh Records|Okèh]]''' ''Records''

...n be observed by going to Start -> Run, typing in command.com and hitting "OK". If you run Task Manager, you can also see the <code>NTVDM.EXE</code> proc

...by MTV to do an Unplugged and I'd really like to do it with you, so I said OK. It gave us a chance to revisit some numbers and use that same picture with

{{CZ:Home/Item|[[CZ:Stubs|Stubs]]|Short articles are OK, as long as they're not ''too'' short.}}

...s" if you want someone to check over them or no if you consider them to be OK.

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

...is filled in (leave all other selections at their default values), the '''OK''' button becomes active. Click it. You may see a hint displayed. If you fi Click on '''OK'''.<br><br>

ok do you want me to insert this into your approved article (red) link?

OK, so I sent a simple e-mail to this address to notify the TI workgroup about

::::OK, hibernation it is...--[[User:David Yamakuchi|David Yamakuchi]] 15:57, 22 M

::OK, good enough. I'll vote for it![[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 14:48, 17 Oc

:::But 'consubstantial' was. OK. It took me awhile to get there. Just put a footnote by the word and make c OK. I need to find some examples of the kind of catalog format that seems reas

* [[CZ:Neutrality Policy]] - review Gareth's abbreviated version; if OK, edit and upload to main page (linking to old version for continued referen

:::Ok, I'll try and thrash something out at the workgroup page (although it's a b ...nces, but also under Astronomy. I suggest to do an exception here. I would Ok the article when 250 words ''about Earth Sciences'' are laid down, if some

:OK, think about how to redo templates, categories and main page. [[User:Peter

DOUBLE CHECKED OK [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 18:03, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

...e a stupid business person. It makes no economic sense whatsoever, and I’m OK with that.{{'}}

dict:find(Key, Dict) = {ok, Val} | error.

...hen click on the "definitions" icon in red, to write a definition subpage. OK, I think I understand it, but this isn't what I want to do. My thinking is

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: ...lo, his mouth opened, and he spoke [[truth]]! Then he danced a [[reel]]--OK, no, he ''played'' a reel, the dancing you don't want to see. By the way,

...here is little time pressure (counting milliseconds), so a file rewrite is OK.

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: ::OK, with some new articles and some cleanup, that's 10,700 total.

...st going to consider it an instructional page. A little bit of overlap is OK, I guess. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:44, 5 January 2008 (CST)

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: ...]] anyways? --[[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 18:24, 3 October 2007 (CDT) Ok, sorry, but I must go now. Enjoy the rest of the evening folks, but here it

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: :OK, a pet peeve: [[continental breakfast]] should be specific to a continent.

:1) Are the minor changes to the article OK, or should we who do this try hard to make more substantive ones? :2) Is the statement on the talk page OK, or overkill, or ???? (Once it is as it should be, I'd intend to use it for

...t specifies the total download size. The next line is a prompt: '''Is this ok [y/N]:'''. You must type '''y'''. The default is '''N''', which (of course) ...'''y''' to the question. You may be prompted with a question whether it is OK to import a GPG key. If so, answer '''y'''.

...r physics getting rid of a force, right? We just unified [[electro-weak]], ok? The [[grand unified field theory]] still escapes us until the document lic

:::Ah, I jumped the gun! So we have to have a vote. OK, everyone who's contributed: put your three tildes and a hash <nowiki>#~~~ ::OK; thanks Jitse. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 22:59, 19 April 200

...nt should not of any concern while deciding between GFDL and CC by-sa. I'm OK with either GFDL or CC by-sa, or even both (dual-licensing).

...lieve, and that’s where my honest position happens to be. I’m frankly more OK with that than a person who says, ‘Oh, I am very much a Christian. I very

I should make more definite recommendations, eh, Hayford? ;-) OK. You do not need to worry about making a subpage tab for recipes. Someone OK, no problem. I redirected the old proposal here (because I did not spot mu

# OK, and what is Citizendium then? <big> OK, and what is Citizendium then?</big>

HTTP/1.1 200 OK ''Request is valid; I am complying according to HTT

...EC:R-2011-027 present procedure] does appear to allow approval without the OK of an editor or even any author participating in the relevant Work Group. T OK then. It would seem that the language of [http://ec.citizendium.org/wiki/EC

...ack. <blockquote>Secretary Powell says his endorsement is not about race...OK, fine. I am now researching his past endorsements to see if I can find all

...cleanup. While sometimes it is well-intended and, in Wikipedia, perfectly OK, it looks useless here, as I guess we make the well-intended requests on ta :::Ok, I solved my problem: TI Workgroup Home Page does not exist yet (and this i

...articles so that we can blue some red. They need lots of work, but are an ok starting point. I'll of course work on them, but i could use all the help

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

::: OK done I think - see [[CZ: Approval for CZ pages]] with a small note on the m

::OK, I'll move the longer parts to separate sections in the [[#Appendix]] then, (undent)OK...let's move toward draft text. Do we simply rule "no pseudonyms" for gener

...es: [[The Economist]], [[New Statesman]], [[The Spectator]], [[Hello!]], [[OK!]], [[Heat]], [[Dazed & Confused]], [[Car (magazine)]], [[Auto Express (mag

: Ok - how do I add another section - I keep messing up when I copy your templat :Ok all, I have started with biographies - creating lists, moving the majority

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: ::::::But the equivalent periodic table navigation tool looks OK? (see [[calcium]]) I need to find out why the colour is not registering. [

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: ...y). By the way, I hope the capitalization on Coordinated Universal Time is OK; if not, somebody tell me! [[User:Bruce M.Tindall|Bruce M.Tindall]] 20:16,

=== Reply: OK, so let's clarify it. ===

...cussion in advance, and I'd like to be in the loop, but if I'm not, that's OK too. More generally, I am trying (have long been trying) to let people kno

<br>Done? you dawg, ah that is the way to spell your middle name, ok good to know

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: :OK, [[stub network]] now done as a base article. There can be lots more develo

::::::::OK-dokey, thanks for the clarification. I was simply writing to elaborate the ...to have a Corrections Editor, and possibly a whole Corrections Workgroup. OK, I'm going to add that in. No one will volunteer for it? Oh, I think you'

...fornia: The Changing Image|publisher=University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK|id=ISBN 0-8061-2020-7}}

:::Granted, it is open to the interpretation that original research is OK on the citizendium, or that editors, not authors, may use the citizendium a OK, done! :-)

'''OK, then what about the tritium:'''<br>

16. Fonseca PC, Nihei OK, Urban-Maldonado M, Abreu S, de Carvalho AC, Spray DC, Savino W, Alves LA (

...en encounters. "But if people can't be convinced that this is real, that's OK. All I want is for people to be convinced that there's something going on h

:::::Ok, I will take it that we all agree to keep the article as is. We don't have

Ok, you can appeal a ban, but is there anyone who can be asked to monitor a co

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

:::: OK! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:03, 25 July 2008 (CDT)

Durer's pentagon is OK, but it should be noted that to obtain an actual fractal some rescaling sho

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: OK, I added a core article on [[cotton]] with three pix. I've got lots more pi

* Type MERGE "" and wait for the BASIC loader to load. The message "0 OK, 0:1" is displayed.

* Type MERGE "" and wait for the BASIC loader to load. The message "0 OK, 0:1" is displayed.

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

...et a good CSS skin. This is very much a precursor for the furture, so it's OK to look like Win95 (reference to the [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=

...about a week to get the [[hyperelliptic curve]] article to be more or less ok (it still needs editing, but the content I want is there). I think that thi OK, I've made some remarks at [[user talk:Catherine Woodgold]] that are releva

== may be OK ==

$server = 'Citizendium'; ## ok in non-strict surrounding scope

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

::OK, I just ran it and will arrange to repeat this on a regular basis. --[[User

...sion before posting; but a call for participation is generally regarded as OK for most academic lists.

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: ...[[Marie Curie]]. Maybe will look in on the whisky later. (No 'e' though). OK hit the [[bottle]] instead.

...ject among straight men, with a very complicated rule set. It's considered OK to spontaneously proclaim your love for an NFL quarterback when he just sco

...is just seemed obvious enough to me to not require a proposal. But that's OK, others might disagree, and it was in a correct form that would allow us to

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules: :::Ok Aleta, of course it is. But what your dog actually does? Could you provide

...on.<ref name="pmid10548201">{{cite journal| author=Brunkhorst FM, Eberhard OK, Brunkhorst R| title=Discrimination of infectious and noninfectious causes

::OK. Apologies for my paranoia about this. [[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin ...o from 1 to 2 - where did the "3 author" part come from? Also, would it be OK if the notice said something like 'This article written by X, Y and Z. Plea

*a bit long but otherwise OK. [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 21:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

...understood what they were, and thought the Taylor series link was probably OK and a trivial decision but it's 40 years since I studied Taylor series) and ...ial addition that makes the article fuller, and more complete, then that's ok. Let the editor nominate and approve. I do not think that a blanket rule of

...sible for their own uses of fair use materials'' satisfies me and I am now ok with the whole proposal. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 23:07, 18 F ::the proposal is OK with me as it now stands, (I do recommend we drop the needless statement ''

: OK but (in my ignorance) I have hit a technical obstacle. I am trying to add a

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

|url=http://www.shgresources.com/ok/symbols/names/ |url=http://www.srh.weather.gov/oun/tornadodata/ok/monthlyannual.php

(3) "OK, editors share equal authority to interpret policy with these workgroups; i ...articles. Editors can't actually make changes on the articles they edit? OK, how do we distinguish, within all the articles assigned to a workgroup (an

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

*a bit long but otherwise OK. [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 21:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

::OK, I'll go with subgroup. One of my reasons for switching from subworkgroup

...ive at that time already having been an author. So we said- (or Larry did) ok, then if 3 Editors (who have all been authors) agree to approve, the articl

OK, I am understanding that this list was intended just as a draft, since ther ...dopt the dual naming system in the title, that should be fine. I would be ok with the scientific name going first as long as there are proper redirects.

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

...ear = 2007 |publisher = Skyhorse Publishing Inc. |location = Oklahoma City OK |nopp = true }}</ref>

|48|| ||OK

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

::::::OK, I am not prepared to discuss this any more. This is a muddled debate where

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

...d use the "r" template, but my question still stands for the middle. Is it ok in its current form? --[[User:Carl Jantzen|Carl Jantzen]] 13:36, 15 August

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

Ok! We've added it, but notice it's not aligned correctly. We will have to t

Ok, I'm going to try and layout and organize what I think needs to still be do ::::Ok, how can we make the policy appear a little more open and inviting. It fee

::OK, no time for arguments on this one. A more simple way to go about voting is

Ok - all good points - just a couple of comments - Stephen - in your citation

:OK, now it seems to be working (at least for me). maybe you had to change the

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

* Is {{tl|Dambigbox}} OK for the header template placed on such main articles? Should it go above, o

:Ah, another thing I didn't know, you're right. OK, scratch the point about private/public (pity, though; I'd thought that tha OK, how 'bout this: a short paragraph at the end of the article clearly does n

...source of argument). So let's pick someone non-controversial, like Meiji, OK? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 19:51, 10 March 2008 (CDT) : I agree that we're into DR on the 'formal names' proposal. However, is it OK if we hold off on your suggested next step for just a few days, to see if a

Well, OK, maybe there are a couple rules:

* Tim Nordwind, bass and vocals for the band Ok Go

...t, but I hope your spouse will even say: "Oh God! Honey! What did you do?" OK? you stole from the church. It's like a red cross on something. So I'm hopi

...ames go on articles, other people seeing the names there, will think, "Oh, OK...I'd better not get involved here, see Mr. Impressive College Professor an OK, Martin, what I don't understand now is why you say "the Editor-in-Chief sh

::::::OK, but as far as I know there have been a few legitimate exceptions. They nee ::OK, I'll try another formulation, and see how people feel. [[User:Martin Baldw

...metre is "ôkay", though the '''K''' is normally the stressed syllable: '''okây'''.</ref>

;DD goes to OK becomes grocer ;DD opens chiro school in his home in OK - offers classes to osteopaths

...bpages were first written. It is possible we need to redesign and that is OK. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 20:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

...a/|title=GaGa: I'm thankful for Christina|date=December 31, 2008|publisher=OK!|accessdate=January 8, 2009}}</ref> Lady Gaga is a natural [[brunette]], ho

::The article seems to have moved OK, but not the talk page. However, I just now created a new talk page for [[

::Well, ok, but the page is locked for me... thanks for the fix. --[[User:Nereo Preto|

OK, we all seem to be agreed on this, actually. I had assumed that the lower c