Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- {{r|Web 2.0}}882 bytes (108 words) - 03:29, 5 January 2011
- ...n. Currently, my interests include public library management, Library 2.0/Web 2.0 applications and theory, public access computer management (especially secu2 KB (220 words) - 04:23, 22 November 2023
- *''Why Make Room for Experts in Web 2.0?'' (text of keynote at SDForum from Oct. 24, 2006)820 bytes (109 words) - 11:51, 5 February 2008
- I track new social media and web 2.0 and work on integrating innovations into complex data structures. I speak p1 KB (143 words) - 04:00, 22 November 2023
- ...Sun Microsystems]] and [[Yahoo!]] - as well as many startups in both the [[Web 2.0]] space and other areas - green technology is one area that is currently gr850 bytes (132 words) - 15:52, 8 March 2023
- ...uted [[identity management systems]], and advancing library services in a "Web 2.0" world.2 KB (292 words) - 04:32, 22 November 2023
- ...d Future Research) for 10 weeks this autumn. My project is named "Peace in Web 2.0" and is focused at exploring social media in general and social networking1 KB (152 words) - 04:36, 22 November 2023
- ==Integrating Web 2.0 services==5 KB (768 words) - 21:25, 6 November 2010
- ...way other people think, and a major step forward is what is today called "Web 2.0". The internet is a storehouse of information, and this information has to974 bytes (159 words) - 04:38, 22 November 2023
- ...ibrary. I am also working with my colleagues to develop ways to integrate web 2.0 technologies, including blogging and social tagging, into the library's ove1 KB (146 words) - 04:08, 22 November 2023
- am part of a team exploring how Web 2.0 should be incorporated into our1 KB (185 words) - 04:14, 22 November 2023
- .... His major areas of research are: geoscience education, online learning, web 2.0 applications, global climate change, the scholarship of teaching and learni1 KB (185 words) - 04:35, 22 November 2023
- ...I also [http://edit.emich.edu/index.php?title=SOTL:Main have researched] Web 2.0 communities and community building, and social knowledge projects. I have2 KB (363 words) - 21:51, 3 October 2009
- ...uld be aware that no one will be assigning you work: this is a "bottom-up" Web 2.0 project, and it thrives precisely because people work on whichever encyclop1 KB (249 words) - 21:12, 26 December 2007
- ==Web 2.0== ...ites cannot yet afford the implementation overhead. But tools support for Web 2.0 design approaches continues to evolve rapidly as of 2008, and this has resu12 KB (1,802 words) - 08:48, 22 April 2024
- ...ve blog on everything about collective intelligence, wisdom of the crowds, Web 2.0 Contact: Howard Rheingold.2 KB (233 words) - 15:41, 26 January 2023
- ...s. His current research interests include asynchronous online discussions, Web 2.0, and 1:1 computer initiatives. Major current events include chairing educat2 KB (242 words) - 04:07, 22 November 2023
- ...such as AMP, GE and Westfield. She is deeply involved with open source and web 2.0 online communities. Over the past few years Kate has worked with marketing3 KB (379 words) - 04:11, 22 November 2023
- ...uld be aware that no one will be assigning you work: this is a "bottom-up" Web 2.0 project, and it thrives precisely because people work on what they want, wh2 KB (356 words) - 13:31, 8 January 2008
- ...uld be aware that no one will be assigning you work: this is a "bottom-up" Web 2.0 project, and it thrives precisely because people work on what they want, wh2 KB (387 words) - 13:43, 8 January 2008
- ...erent projects, and have become very interested in community management in Web 2.0. Since the only thing really differing CZ from WP is its pretensions toward2 KB (324 words) - 04:49, 22 November 2023
- {{rpr|Web 2.0}}3 KB (454 words) - 09:14, 28 March 2024
- ...uld be aware that no one will be assigning you work: this is a "bottom-up" Web 2.0 project, and it thrives precisely because people work on what they want, wh2 KB (364 words) - 03:15, 11 October 2007
- {{rpr|Web 2.0}}4 KB (660 words) - 10:45, 7 March 2024
- ...This is a matter of personal preferences of many individuals. Perhaps most web 2.0 participants are attracted by 'as free as possible' kind of license.4 KB (698 words) - 09:55, 4 November 2007
- ...ren't really seeing the potential that you would hope for with all of the Web 2.0 tools out there. We aren't seeing the academic community take advantage of7 KB (1,079 words) - 03:41, 22 November 2023
- {{rpr|Web 2.0}}11 KB (1,461 words) - 10:46, 7 March 2024
- ...riety of web based mashups. [[Tim O'Reilly]] lists Mashups as one of the [[Web 2.0]] technologies. <ref name="Web2.0"> title="Levels of the Game: The Hierarchy of Web 2.0 Applications"}}24 KB (3,662 words) - 09:57, 20 August 2023
- ...ice.eu/resource/1680 2007, State-of-the-art in Good Practice Exchange and Web 2.0 - Report prepared by ePractice.eu - a project funded by the European Commi6 KB (945 words) - 20:25, 22 March 2008
- ...tarted by a co-founder of Wikipedia, Dr. Larry Sanger, is quite unusual as Web 2.0 projects go. "We are focused on quality and responsibility as well as quan5 KB (685 words) - 19:30, 22 December 2007
- ...riety of web based mashups. [[Tim O'Reilly]] lists Mashups as one of the [[Web 2.0]] technologies. <ref name="Web2.0"> title="Levels of the Game: The Hierarchy of Web 2.0 Applications"}}24 KB (3,761 words) - 14:00, 18 February 2024
- ...the adaptive learning research area. Group collaboration is a key field in Web 2.0 which extends the functionality of distance learning. Adaptive learning can13 KB (1,938 words) - 10:30, 29 August 2008
- ...s hope that we can correct exactly the sort of abuses that people demonize Web 2.0 for,” said the project’s Editor-in-Chief, Wikipedia co-founder Dr. Larr4 KB (638 words) - 20:01, 21 February 2009
- ...am actively involved in the emerging field of [[Science 2.0]], in which [[Web 2.0]] tools like [[wiki]]s or [[blog]]s are combined with the [[scientific meth8 KB (1,029 words) - 04:54, 21 March 2024
- ...ly in the broad set of media, software, websites, and venues identified as Web 2.0. Particularly when encountering existing or created web pages, the anonymou7 KB (1,051 words) - 18:31, 13 March 2024
- {{rpl|Web 2.0}}4 KB (641 words) - 10:45, 7 March 2024
- ...rtually free of the sort of vandalism and irresponsibility for which other Web 2.0 projects are frequently criticized, partly because real names are required5 KB (770 words) - 12:30, 30 October 2007
- ...ttp://www.citizendium.org/roomforexperts.html Why Make Room for Experts in Web 2.0?] (text of keynote at SDForum from Oct. 24, 2006)5 KB (759 words) - 17:02, 5 March 2024
- :: Hey, this is a Web 2.0 project, so why don't we use some kind of flash ticker, controllable by the5 KB (855 words) - 21:08, 17 December 2007
- ...ought through one of her classes doing assignments here, including in some Web 2.0 and related areas. I personally would appreciate DNS review.6 KB (941 words) - 10:53, 7 March 2024
- ...of ''CMS'' is growing due to the expansion of web usage, especially with [[Web 2.0]] that allows web sites to interact with others web sites.26 KB (3,927 words) - 13:35, 11 May 2011
- We are a [[CZ:We aren't Wikipedia|different]] sort of Web 2.0 project:6 KB (933 words) - 05:02, 8 March 2024
- {{rpl|Web 2.0}}5 KB (729 words) - 12:19, 26 September 2013
- ...ogy blogs and news outlets more traditionally associated with discussing [[Web 2.0]] services. Despite numerous statements by scientists - including statement7 KB (1,041 words) - 13:05, 15 October 2010
- :::Part of my pushing the argument here is also pushing the whole web 2.0 knowledge horizon. I agree with what Larry has said in other venues, that7 KB (1,230 words) - 19:42, 3 February 2009
- ...t. Examples of this are [[mobile software agents]], [[Java Applet]]s and [[Web 2.0]] applications.15 KB (2,278 words) - 05:21, 8 March 2024
- ...active televised distance courses, as well as synchronous and asynchronous web 2.0 programming support. Previously, Paul operated SafetyNets Inc, an IT secur11 KB (1,622 words) - 04:30, 22 November 2023
- Second, a lot of Web 2.0 advocates, whose favorite online platforms are websites like Wikipedia and9 KB (1,447 words) - 02:45, 8 March 2024
- *'''Web 2.0 Technologies''' –Allows family and friends to browse for potential matche23 KB (3,464 words) - 11:48, 2 February 2023
- I'd hate to see us drifting into one of the "Web 2.0" styles that makes everything so general that it provides no engineering gu14 KB (2,257 words) - 10:48, 17 April 2010