Search results

* [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] 95% * [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] 64%

...te journal |author=Erbel R, Schweizer P, Krebs W, Meyer J, Effert S |title=Sensitivity and specificity of two-dimensional echocardiography in detection of impaired left ventricul

...preferred rapid diagnostic test for evaluating urethritis. It is highly [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive and specific]] for documenting both urethritis and the presence o

...ivity]] for differentiating bacterial from viral infections was 92% with [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 73%.<ref name="pmid15307030">{{cite journal| author=Simon

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 87% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 32%

* [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] = 97%<ref name="pmid11180735">{{cite journal |author=Gould MK * [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] = 78%<ref name="pmid11180735"/>to 82%<ref name="pmid18235105"

...ime]] (dAPTT) or dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT). These are more [[sensitivity and specificity|specific]] tests. These antibodies may interact with other risk factors suc

...f> This study reported a [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] and [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 94% and 83%, respectively. In populations similar to thos

...ref> were more accurate than physician judgment because of the increased [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of the prediction rules. ! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

...one has insufficient [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of 83% ([[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 74%)<ref name="pmid18403624">{{cite journal |author=Moon W

! Finding!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

! &nbsp;!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio]]+ !! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio]]-

The classic [[sign (medical)|signs]] on [[physical examination]] have a [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of less than 10%.<ref name="pmid19273776">{{cite journal |aut The transthoracic echocardiogram has a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 65% and 95% if the echocardiographer believes there is 'pr

|+Sensitivity and specificity of cardiac stress tests<ref name="pmid10357690">{{cite journal |author=Garb ! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]

* In one study, normal overnight oximetry was very [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] and so if normal, sleep apnea was unlikely.<ref name="pmid83571 ...rations/hour, was very [[Sensitivity and specificity|specific]], but not [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]].<ref name="pmid8539678">{{cite journal| author=Ryan PJ, Hilton

...alidating the prediction of lower urinary tract infection in primary care: sensitivity and specificity of urinary dipsticks and clinical scores in women. | journal=Br J Gen Pract

| Diagnosis||sensitiv*[Title/Abstract] OR sensitivity and specificity[MeSH Terms] OR diagnos*{Title/Abstract] OR diagnosis[MeSH:noexp] OR diagnos

: See also [[Bayes Theorem]], [[sensitivity and specificity]], and [[likelihood ratio]]. ...66 |issn=}}</ref><br/>([[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] plus [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]) ||Easy to understand<br/>Stable with prevalence of disease

...immunoenzyme technique]], and [[polymerase chain reaction]] testing. The [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of these tests range from 63% to 95%.<ref>Beyer WE. Heterogen The [[polymerase chain reaction]] is the most [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] test and is as sensitive as viral culture.<ref name="pmid192813