Search results

{{rpr|Dokdo}} (August 10 — 16, 2012)

== [[Template:2isletsdata]] in [[Dokdo]] == If so, could you subst [[Template:2isletsdata]] into [[Dokdo]], so that it can then be deleted?<br />

==Dokdo is go==

Today the [[Dokdo]] article will be approved. Thank you for all the efforts you put in. The a

I'm concerned about the Dokdo-Takeshima-Liancourt Rocks dispute between Japan & South Korea. Back in Wiki ...for example, S Korean online newspapers publicized the Wikipedia move from Dokdo to Liancourt Rocks). At the same time, no one should be afraid to make the

Last time [[Dokdo]] was approved, there were 74 articles in the approved list. Now there are

...uth Korea are in dispute over the islets of Liancourt Rocks (English name)/Dokdo (Korean)/Takeshima (Japan). S. Korea has controlled the islets for 50 years ...ocks, Dokdo, or Takeshima? Japan argues for Takeshima; S. Korea argues for Dokdo b/c 1) Takeshima is Japanese 2) Liancourt Rocks "gives in" to the Japanese

...aybe write-a-thons). You may want to look at the introductory section of [[Dokdo/Debate Guide]] that I wrote because I did the exactly the same thing in des :Your [[Dokdo/Debate Guide]] discussion makes some very important general points, particu

! style="text-align: left;" | &nbsp;Geographical data on Dokdo ! style="text-align: left;" | &nbsp;Geographical data on Dokdo

...zy to improve it). Last time when I tried to get an article approved, on [[Dokdo]], I received a lot of help, which I'm still thankful for. ([[User:Chunbum

...ld it up as anything other than an early exemplar of the type. Also, see [[Dokdo/Debate_Guide]], [[Adoption/Debate_Guide]] looks like a particularly good ex

...naming is separate from neutrality, only based on common use?]? It's about Dokdo/Liancourt Rocks/Takeshima article - the name & the presentation of it. A fe