Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- ...for publication based on the direction or strength of the study findings. Publication bias has an impact on the interpretation of [[randomized controlled trial|clinic Publication bias has been documented to occur.<ref name="pmid1727960">{{cite journal |author26 KB (3,611 words) - 11:47, 8 September 2024
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 22:41, 23 December 2007
- 211 bytes (27 words) - 10:19, 8 September 2009
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 05:54, 17 October 2010
- | pagename = Publication bias | abc = Publication bias849 bytes (70 words) - 05:54, 17 October 2010
- 12 bytes (1 word) - 22:42, 23 December 2007
- 387 bytes (48 words) - 17:35, 7 July 2009
- ...f Failed Scientific Experiments] — an essay at [[Wired Magazine]] on publication bias and how it can be reduced221 bytes (34 words) - 05:21, 20 September 2010
Page text matches
- | pagename = Publication bias | abc = Publication bias849 bytes (70 words) - 05:54, 17 October 2010
- ...about statistical significance, [[statistical power]], [[p value]], and [[publication bias]]174 bytes (20 words) - 09:53, 7 December 2022
- ...f Failed Scientific Experiments] — an essay at [[Wired Magazine]] on publication bias and how it can be reduced221 bytes (34 words) - 05:21, 20 September 2010
- {{r|Publication bias}} {{r|Publication bias}}2 KB (227 words) - 07:00, 30 July 2024
- {{r|Publication bias}}712 bytes (85 words) - 19:17, 11 January 2010
- {{r|Publication bias}}558 bytes (73 words) - 12:19, 17 August 2024
- {{r|Publication bias}}1 KB (178 words) - 12:00, 14 September 2024
- {{r|Publication bias}}654 bytes (84 words) - 17:01, 9 August 2024
- ...n well researched and so is subject to false positive conclusions due to [[publication bias]]. ...n well researched and so is subject to false positive conclusions due to [[publication bias]].2 KB (305 words) - 17:00, 31 August 2024
- {{r|Publication bias}}771 bytes (98 words) - 12:01, 22 August 2024
- {{r|Publication bias}}896 bytes (112 words) - 03:53, 9 September 2024
- ...execution of randomized controlled trials. An example is an analysis of [[publication bias]].<ref name="pmid20679560">{{cite journal| author=Bourgeois FT, Murthy S, M1 KB (161 words) - 17:00, 29 July 2024
- {{r|Publication bias}}980 bytes (118 words) - 12:00, 11 July 2024
- ===Publication bias=== {{main|Publication bias}}6 KB (909 words) - 11:29, 19 December 2011
- {{r|Publication bias}}1 KB (163 words) - 17:01, 6 August 2024
- ==Publication bias== ...show no effect or are inconclusive. The Merck affair is ''not'' a case of publication bias, but raises different but interesting issues. The core issue here is relate8 KB (1,261 words) - 05:45, 23 December 2011
- ...ned, then the predominance of positive homeopathy trial reports reflects [[publication bias]], and hence the magnitude of effects should diminish with sample size and ...ch are inconclusive or produce a negative outcome. This problem, called "[[publication bias]]", reflects both the perceived unwillingness of academic journals to publi7 KB (1,012 words) - 08:03, 1 April 2011
- ...for publication based on the direction or strength of the study findings. Publication bias has an impact on the interpretation of [[randomized controlled trial|clinic Publication bias has been documented to occur.<ref name="pmid1727960">{{cite journal |author26 KB (3,611 words) - 11:47, 8 September 2024
- ...eported funnel plot asymmetry which notes its results may be affected by [[publication bias]] against negative studies. Of note, in the field of complementary and [[alternative medicine]] (CAM), publication bias or bias in interpretation of studies, may be more common than in other disc10 KB (1,460 words) - 17:01, 9 August 2024
- ...= |url= |issn=}}</ref>; however, the limited research may be affected by [[publication bias]].3 KB (412 words) - 08:18, 20 June 2011