Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • | pagename = Publication bias | abc = Publication bias
    849 bytes (70 words) - 05:54, 17 October 2010
  • ...about statistical significance, [[statistical power]], [[p value]], and [[publication bias]]
    174 bytes (20 words) - 09:53, 7 December 2022
  • ...f Failed Scientific Experiments] — an essay at [[Wired Magazine]] on publication bias and how it can be reduced
    221 bytes (34 words) - 05:21, 20 September 2010
  • {{r|Publication bias}}
    553 bytes (71 words) - 16:55, 11 January 2010
  • {{r|Publication bias}}
    712 bytes (85 words) - 19:17, 11 January 2010
  • {{r|Publication bias}}
    622 bytes (81 words) - 20:53, 11 January 2010
  • {{r|Publication bias}}
    798 bytes (96 words) - 10:58, 11 January 2010
  • ...n well researched and so is subject to false positive conclusions due to [[publication bias]]. ...n well researched and so is subject to false positive conclusions due to [[publication bias]].
    2 KB (301 words) - 00:38, 13 January 2008
  • ...execution of randomized controlled trials. An example is an analysis of [[publication bias]].<ref name="pmid20679560">{{cite journal| author=Bourgeois FT, Murthy S, M
    1 KB (157 words) - 11:42, 26 June 2011
  • ===Publication bias=== {{main|Publication bias}}
    6 KB (909 words) - 11:29, 19 December 2011
  • {{r|Publication bias}}
    2 KB (203 words) - 11:57, 11 January 2010
  • ==Publication bias== ...show no effect or are inconclusive. The Merck affair is ''not'' a case of publication bias, but raises different but interesting issues. The core issue here is relate
    8 KB (1,261 words) - 05:45, 23 December 2011
  • ...ned, then the predominance of positive homeopathy trial reports reflects [[publication bias]], and hence the magnitude of effects should diminish with sample size and ...ch are inconclusive or produce a negative outcome. This problem, called "[[publication bias]]", reflects both the perceived unwillingness of academic journals to publi
    7 KB (1,012 words) - 08:03, 1 April 2011
  • ...for publication based on the direction or strength of the study findings. Publication bias has an impact on the interpretation of [[randomized controlled trial|clinic Publication bias has been documented to occur.<ref name="pmid1727960">{{cite journal |author
    28 KB (3,923 words) - 14:09, 2 February 2023
  • ...eported funnel plot asymmetry which notes its results may be affected by [[publication bias]] against negative studies. Of note, in the field of complementary and [[alternative medicine]] (CAM), publication bias or bias in interpretation of studies, may be more common than in other disc
    10 KB (1,456 words) - 09:08, 4 October 2022
  • ...= |url= |issn=}}</ref>; however, the limited research may be affected by [[publication bias]].
    3 KB (412 words) - 08:18, 20 June 2011
  • {{r|Publication bias}}
    4 KB (505 words) - 16:36, 11 January 2010
  • ...es were done by German authors). I added this to this article and to the [[publication bias]] article. ...omplementary..." can be removed as it is not needed as long as the link to publication bias is present. - [[User:Robert Badgett|Robert Badgett]] 15:27, 7 February 2008
    15 KB (2,399 words) - 08:37, 9 February 2008
  • {{rpr|Publication bias}}
    4 KB (630 words) - 10:49, 7 March 2024
  • ===Publication bias=== ...http://www.annals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=8610949 |issn=}}</ref> Publication bias may be more of a problem in diagnostic test research than in randomized con
    36 KB (5,130 words) - 20:23, 15 August 2012
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)