Era of Good Feelings: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Era of Good Feelings''', approximately 1816-1824, was an era of very weak partisanship during the administration of U.S. President [[James Monroe]]. The [[Federalist Party]], which had opposed the [[War of 1812]] and verged on disloyalty and secession, virtually collapsed. It ran candidates in only a few remote areas. The dominant [[Democratic-Republican Party]] (usually called the "Republican party") almost ceased to function. President Monroe deliberately sponsored a non-partisan spirit of nationalism and national unity, reinforced by his triumphal tours to all sections of the country. The era ended in 1824 when multiple candidates sought the presidency, and the Republican party caucus in Congress, which formally had selected presidential candidates, collapsed. There was an economic downturn in 1819 which sourced politics in some states, especially Kentucky. The slavery issue flared and was resolved by the [[Missouri Compromise]]. Neither issue changed the overall national mood of nonpartisanship and low turnout, which marked the end of the [[First party System]].
{{subpages}}
The '''Era of Good Feelings''' (also called the ''Era of Good Feeling'', as first used in the Boston ''Columbian Centinel'' on July 12, 1817), approximately 1816–1824, was an era of very weak partisanship during the administration of U.S. President [[James Monroe]]. The [[Federalist Party]], which had opposed the [[War of 1812]] and verged on disloyalty and secession, virtually collapsed. It ran candidates in only a few remote areas. The dominant [[Democratic-Republican Party]] (usually called the "Republican Party") almost ceased to function. President Monroe deliberately sponsored a non-partisan spirit of nationalism and national unity, reinforced by his triumphal tours to all sections of the country. The era ended in 1824 when multiple candidates sought the presidency, and the Republican Party caucus in Congress, which formerly had selected presidential candidates, collapsed. There was an economic downturn in 1819 which sourced politics in some states, especially Kentucky. The slavery issue flared and was resolved by the [[Missouri Compromise]]. Neither issue changed the overall national mood of nonpartisanship and low turnout, which marked the end of the [[First Party System]].
 
==See also==
==See also==
* [[First Party System]]
* [[First Party System]][[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]
==Bibliography==
* George Dangerfield, ''The Era of Good Feelings''
<references/>
----------
[[Category:History Workgroup]]
[[Category:CZ Live]]

Latest revision as of 06:00, 13 August 2024

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The Era of Good Feelings (also called the Era of Good Feeling, as first used in the Boston Columbian Centinel on July 12, 1817), approximately 1816–1824, was an era of very weak partisanship during the administration of U.S. President James Monroe. The Federalist Party, which had opposed the War of 1812 and verged on disloyalty and secession, virtually collapsed. It ran candidates in only a few remote areas. The dominant Democratic-Republican Party (usually called the "Republican Party") almost ceased to function. President Monroe deliberately sponsored a non-partisan spirit of nationalism and national unity, reinforced by his triumphal tours to all sections of the country. The era ended in 1824 when multiple candidates sought the presidency, and the Republican Party caucus in Congress, which formerly had selected presidential candidates, collapsed. There was an economic downturn in 1819 which sourced politics in some states, especially Kentucky. The slavery issue flared and was resolved by the Missouri Compromise. Neither issue changed the overall national mood of nonpartisanship and low turnout, which marked the end of the First Party System.

See also