CZ:Featured article/Current: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chunbum Park
(→‎Mind-body problem: 2012 doomsday prophecy)
imported>John Stephenson
(template)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== '''[[2012 doomsday prophecy]]''' ==
{{:{{FeaturedArticleTitle}}}}
----
<small>
'''2012''' doomsday predictions were irrational fears fueled by certain booksellers, fearmongers, moviemakers and other hucksters to encourage public panic for the purpose of making money. The hoax used dubious claims about [[astronomy]] and ancient Mayan calendars to promote nonsensical predictions regarding apocalyptic events supposed to occur on December 21st or 23rd of 2012. Doomsayers suggested there will be destruction caused by global floods, solar flares, exploding sun, reversals of the magnetic field, or planetary collisions.<ref name=twsMar14g>{{cite news
==Footnotes==
|author= Maria Puente
|title= Oh, Maya! Is 2012 the end? Film boosts doomsday frenzy
|publisher= USA Today
|date= 2009-11-12
|url= http://www.usatoday.com/life/lifestyle/2009-11-12-2012_CV_N.htm
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref><ref name=twsMar14k>{{cite news
|title= Scared Of Planet Nibiru? NASA Would Like To Help
|publisher= NPR
|date= November 15, 2009
|url= http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120436493
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref> Many people are scared.<ref name=twsMar14f>{{cite news
|author=  Brian Handwerk
|title= 2012 Prophecies Sparking Real Fears, Suicide Warnings
|publisher= Huffington Post, National Geographic News
|date= 2009-11-10
|url= http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/10/2012-prophecies-sparking_n_352296.html
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref><ref name=twsMar14m>{{cite news
|author= CHRISTINE BROUWER
|title= Will the World End in 2012?
|publisher= ABC News
|date= July 3, 2008
|url= http://a.abcnews.com/international/story?id=5301284&page=1
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref>
 
Scientists agree 2012 doomsday forecasts are "bunk".<ref name=twsMar14b>{{cite news
|author= Mark Stevenson, Associated Press
|title= Scientists debunk 2012 as doomsday date
|publisher= San Francisco Chronicle
|date= October 11, 2009
|url= http://articles.sfgate.com/2009-10-11/news/17183490_1_meteor-tablet-stone
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref><ref name=twsMar14e>{{cite news
|author= DENNIS OVERBYE
|title= Is Doomsday Coming? Perhaps, but Not in 2012 
|publisher= The New York Times
|date= November 16, 2009
|url= http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/science/17essay.html
|accessdate= 2010-03-14
}}</ref>
 
The 2012 doomsday pop culture phenomenon was similar in many respects to the "Y2K" phenomenon which marked New Year's Eve in 1999, when the new millennium happened. The hysteria has also been compared to the panic created by Orson Welles radio program ''War of the Worlds''. But the "2012 apocalypse business is booming", according to the ''Huffington Post''. The 2012 doomsday prediction was one more example of a patten repeated over the centuries; for example, Baptist preacher William Miller convinced perhaps a hundred thousand Americans that the second coming of [[Jesus Christ]] would happen in 1843; it didn't. Doomsday predictions tend to be within the span of about ten years from the present, according to University of Wisconsin historian Paul Boyer, since the sense of "imminence" and that it will "happen soon" is necessary for these hysterias to catch the public imagination.<ref name=twsMar14f/>
[[Image:Planet.jpg|thumb|left|alt=Planet.|Planet "Nibiru" doesn't exist except in the minds of believers of disaster scenarios such as 2012.]]
 
''[[2012 doomsday prophecy|.... (read more)]]''
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="width: 90%; float: center; margin: 0.5em 1em 0.8em 0px;"
|-
! style="text-align: center;" | &nbsp;[[2012 doomsday prophecy#References|notes]]
|-
|
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
|}
</small>

Latest revision as of 10:19, 11 September 2020

Categories of smart home devices shown on Amazon's website in April 2023.

The phrase smart home refers to home automation devices that have internet access. Home automation, a broader category, includes any device that can be monitored or controlled via wireless radio signals, not just those having internet access. Whether the device is powered by the electrical grid or by battery, if it uses the home Wi-Fi network and if an internet logon needs to be created to use it, then it is smart home technology.

Collectively, all the smart home devices on every home's Wi-Fi network helps to make up what is called the Internet of Things (IoT), a huge sea of sensors and control devices across the world that are capable of being accessed from afar via the internet. One of the key reasons such devices need internet access is so that the manufacturer can periodically download updated firmware to the device to keep it up-to-date. However, being available via the internet also means that such devices are, potentially, available for spying or hacking. Today, homes may contain dozens or even hundreds of such devices, and consumers may enjoy their benefits while knowing little about how they work, or even realizing that they are present.

Not all home automation is "smart"

Many remotely controllable devices do not require internet access. They may instead have physical control devices that use either RF (“Radio Frequency”) or IR (“Infrared”) beams, two different kinds of energy used in remote controls to communicate commands. Non-"smart" home automation may also present security risks, because the control signals can be hijacked by bad actors with the right signaling equipment. Garage door openers are of particular note in this regard. Modern automobiles, in fact, are full of automation similar to home automation, and cars are hackable by bad actors in a number of ways. See Wikipedia's Automotive hacking article for more information.

Incompatibility hassles

At present, consumers must make sure that the smart device they wish to use is specified to be compatible whichever phone/tablet operating system they use (Apple vs. Android). Since smart home products emerged in the absence of any standard, a morass of competing methods for networking, control and monitoring now exist. For some products, consumers may need to buy an expensive hub, or bridge, a device that is specific to one vendor. Products made by different manufacturers but performing the same function are typically not interoperable. Consumers often need to open a different app on their smartphone or tablet in order to control devices by each manufacturer. This may make it too expensive and awkward to try out competing devices, leaving consumers stuck with the product they bought originally or else having to add yet more apps to their phones.

Security concerns

Security for smart home products has been uneven and sometimes seriously inadequate. Smart thermostats which can monitor whether a home's occupants are present or not, entry-way locks, robotic vacuums that work with a map of the house, and other smart home devices can present very real dangers if hackers can access their data.

Matter, an emerging standard

Matter is emerging standard in 2023 intended to increase security, reliability and inter-operability of smart-home devices. About ten years ago, industry consortiums formed to work on standards for smart home device communications, and their underlying wireless communications, which would make it possible for products from all vendors to work together seamlessly and provide fast performance, privacy, and security and would work even if there is not connection to the outside internet (i.e., no connection to "the cloud" or to servers).

Footnotes