CZ:Ref:DOI:10.1086/204350: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen (comment) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (+critique) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| url = http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/204350 | | url = http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/204350 | ||
}} | }} | ||
:Proposed that the energetic costs of the [[metabolism|resting metabolism]] of different organs within the body have to be balanced. Specifically, such a trade-off is hypothesized to have governed the increasing [[brain size]] during [[primate]] and [[human evolution]], in concert with a decrease in the amount of [[digestion|digestive]] tissue. | :Proposed that the energetic costs of the [[metabolism|resting metabolism]] of different organs within the body have to be balanced. Specifically, such a trade-off is hypothesized to have governed the increasing [[brain size]] during [[primate]] and [[human evolution]], in concert with a decrease in the amount of [[digestion|digestive]] tissue. For a critique, see [[CZ:Ref:Hladik 1999 On Diet and Gut Size in Non-human Primates and Humans: is There a Relationship to Brain Size?|Hladik et al. (1999)]]. | ||
Latest revision as of 09:19, 15 January 2009
Aiello, L.C. & P. Wheeler (1995), "The Expensive-Tissue Hypothesis: the Brain and the Digestive System in Human and Primate Evolution", Current Anthropology 36 (2): 199-221, DOI:10.1086/204350 [e]
- Proposed that the energetic costs of the resting metabolism of different organs within the body have to be balanced. Specifically, such a trade-off is hypothesized to have governed the increasing brain size during primate and human evolution, in concert with a decrease in the amount of digestive tissue. For a critique, see Hladik et al. (1999).