Talk:Air Resources Laboratory
|NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page.|
|I released this article to Wikipedia. In particular, the identical text that appears there is of my sole authorship. Therefore, no credit for Wikipedia content on the Citizendium applies.|
|Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice.|
My Wikipedian involvement in this article
I was not the original Wikipedian author of this article, but I revised and reformatted it heavily and expanded it by about 80 to 90 percent.
I have uploaded here as is and will now start cleaning it up to be suitable for CZ. - Milton Beychok 16:49, 2 February 2008 (CST)
- Thanks, Milton. Is this nearly as far as the article can and should be taken? Is it really close to approval? If not, it should be marked status=2, not status=1. --Larry Sanger 19:02, 2 February 2008 (CST)
- Larry, first let me say that Stephen Ewen explained to me the intent of the Topic Informant Workgroup in a manner that I understood. I will comply with policy from now on.
- As for this article, in my opinion, this article is about as far as I can take it and as far as it deserves to be taken. Regards, Milton Beychok 12:10, 3 February 2008 (CST)
Re consideration of approval Air Resources Laboratory
Milton, this article appears ready to begin the approval process.
My only reaction after reading it was that I could get a better feel for ARL's operation if you added a few examples of specific activities, perhaps drawing from their activity reports.
In other words, what good things has ARL done for us lately? Anthony.Sebastian 16:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, Tony: I would be happy to select certain of their recent activities, mention them briefly and provide references links to the source activity reports. However, I would like to wait until the Boiling point/Draft has been re-approved. It has been waiting now for 2 months ... which is more than enough time in which to decide whether or not to re-approve it. Especially now that we have two Approval Managers.