Citizendium - a community developing a quality comprehensive compendium of knowledge, online and free. Click here to join and contribute—free
CZ thanks our previous donors. Donate here. Treasurer's Financial Report -- Thanks to our content contributors. --

Rydberg constant

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium

Jump to: navigation, search
This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
This editable Main Article is under development and not meant to be cited; by editing it you can help to improve it towards a future approved, citable version. These unapproved articles are subject to a disclaimer.


The Rydberg constant, often denoted as R, originally defined empirically in terms of the spectrum of hydrogen, is given a theoretical value by the Bohr theory of the atom as (in SI units):[1]

R_{\infty} = \frac{m_ee^4}{4\pi \hbar^3 c_0}\ \left( \frac{\mu_0 c_0^2}{4 \pi}\right)^2\ = \ \alpha^2 \frac{m_e c_0}{2h}  \ ,

where is the reduced Planck's constant h/(2π), μ0 is the magnetic constant, e is the elementary charge, me is the electron mass, c0 is the SI units defined value for the speed of light in vacuum, and α is the fine structure constant:[2]

 \alpha = \frac{e^2}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 \hbar c_0} \ ,

where ε0 is the electric constant.

The best value for R at the moment is:[3]

R = 10 973 731.568 539(55) m−1.


The Rydberg constant is the common scaling factor for all hydrogen transitions.[4] Its measurement has proven often to be a testing ground for theoretical results. The original introduction of this constant by JR Rydberg in 1889 was through a formula for the wavelengths associated with alkali metal transitions, which can be formulated for the hydrogen atom as:

\frac{1}{\lambda} = R\ \left(\frac{1}{p^2} - \frac{1}{n^2} \right ) \ ,

where R is a constant and n and p are any integers, with n>p. The case for p=2 is called the Balmer series and for p=1 the Lyman series. The first value for the Rydberg constant was found using this formula, and was totally empirical.

In 1913 Neils Bohr developed a theory of the atom predicting the hydrogen atom to have energy levels (in SI units):

E_n = -\frac{me^4}{8\varepsilon _0^2 h^2 n^2} \ ,

with e the electron charge, m the electron mass, ε0 the electric constant, h Planck's constant, and n the so-called principal quantum number. According to this model, the wavelength λ of a transition of an electron moving from state n to state p is then:

 \frac{1}{\lambda} = \frac{me^4}{8\varepsilon_0^2h^3c_0}\left ( \frac{1}{p^2} - \frac{1}{n^2} \right) \ ,

with c0 the SI defined valued for the speed of light in vacuum. Thus, a theoretical expression for the Rydberg constant is obtained:

R_{\infty} = \frac{me^4}{8\varepsilon_0^2h^3c_0} \ ,

which is found to be the same as the expressions above using the relations:

\hbar = \frac{h}{2\pi }; \ \ \ \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 = \frac{1}{c_0^2} \ .

Today's theories of the hydrogen atom take into account many complexities not found in the Bohr theory of the atom. These include relativistic effects, the finite nuclear mass, and corrections due to quantum electrodynamics. However, these effects are relatively small, about 10−5, so the Bohr model gives a pretty accurate idea of the hydrogen spectrum, although the value of R in the Rydberg formula for the hydrogen spectrum is slightly different from the value R called the Rydberg constant today.[4]


  1. GW Series (1988). “Chapter 10: Hydrogen and the fundamental atomic constants”, The Spectrum of atomic hydrogen--advances: a collection of progress reports by experts. World Scientific, p. 485. ISBN 9971502615. 
  2. fine-structure constant. The NIST reference on constants, units, and uncertainty. NIST. Retrieved on 2011-03-14.
  3. Rydberg constant. The NIST reference on constants, units and uncertainty. NIST. Retrieved on 2011-03-14.
  4. 4.0 4.1 This discussion is based upon the review by B Cagnac, MD Plimmer, L Julien and F Biraben (1994). "The hydrogen atom, a tool for metrology". Rep. Prog. Phys. vol. 57: pp. 853-893.
Personal tools