Quantization

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Talk
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and not meant to be cited; by editing it you can help to improve it towards a future approved, citable version. These unapproved articles are subject to a disclaimer.

In physics, the term quantization refers to the energy of physical systems being discontinuous—quantized. The size of discrete energy steps is determined by Planck's constant h. This natural constant is so small (h ≈ 6.626 ×10−34 Js) that on a macroscopic scale (energies on the order of joules, time intervals on the order of seconds), quantization is a minute effect that can hardly be observed. For all intents and purposes, macroscopic energies are continuous. However, for microscopic systems, such as electrons orbiting a nucleus, quantization is important.

Energy quantization was first introduced in 1900 by Max Planck in his theory of black-body radiation,[1] when he assumed that the walls of a black-body consist of harmonic oscillators and that the energies of these oscillators are discrete, i.e., quantized. He was forced to introduce this assumption in his explanation of the experimentally observed deviations from Wien's distribution law. Planck did not quantize the black-body radiation—a form of electromagnetic radiation—this was done by Albert Einstein five years later,[2] who postulated that the electromagnetic field consists of light quanta (energy parcels, that were later called photons). Einstein's energy parcels are of size , where ν is the frequency of the electromagnetic waves.[3]

In 1923 Louis de Broglie[4] announced that the relativistic kinetic energy of material particles is also quantized and he derived as the consequence that the motion of material particles is wave-like. The very small value of h explains why the wavelike nature of matter is very difficult to demonstrate on a macroscopic scale. The work of de Broglie inspired Erwin Schrödinger to postulate a wave equation[5] that describes the motion of very light material particles, such as electrons. When Schrödinger's wave equation is solved with appropriate boundary conditions, energy quantization follows automatically for bound systems (not for unbound systems where particles come and go to and from infinity). In Schrödinger's theory certain operators play a role that correspond to classical—electromagnetic or mechanical—properties.

Quantization rules

In a second meaning of the word, quantization refers to the replacement of classical quantities by quantum mechanical operators. In general, two kinds of operators are distinguished:

  1. Those corresponding to dynamic variables; they are Hermitian and referred to as observables.
  2. Those corresponding to transformations of the system (rotations and translations); they are unitary.

The process of quantization only applies to operators of the first kind, i.e., to observables. A classical dynamic quantity (defined in classical mechanics or electromagnetism) has a quantum mechanical counterpart, an observable (Hermitian operator) A. To construct the latter, we consider a single particle without spin subject to a scalar potential. Classically the quantity is a function of its momentum p, its position vector r, and the time t, . With r = (x, y, z) is associated the observable R and with p = (px, py, pz) the observable P. The two operators satisfy the commutation relations

where ℏ is Planck's constant and δij is the Kronecker delta. To obtain the observable A one could replace in the expression for the variables r and p by the observables R and P,

However, this mode of action would be, in general, ambiguous. For instance, in classical mechanics the inner product pr is equal to rp, but simple replacement in the two forms gives two operator forms that are not equal, because

Moreover, neither of these two operator expressions is Hermitian. Hence to the replacement rule must be added a symmetrization rule, which classically is allowed and usually trivial. For example, the observable associated with pr is obtained by first symmetrizing the classical expression, and then making the replacement

which is indeed Hermitian. In systems consisting of more than one particle, the coordinates and momenta are replaced one particle at the time and this is done for all particles consecutively.

Remarks:

  1. There exist quantum physical quantities which have no classical equivalent and which are defined directly as an observable (this is the case for particle spin).
  2. The procedure just sketched applies only to quantities in Cartesian coordinates. For other coordinate systems, such as spherical polar coordinates the procedure must be generalized.

Example

Consider the Hamiltonian (energy) of a spinless particle of charge q and mass m placed in an electric field derived from a scalar potential U(r). The potential energy of the particle is therefore V(r) = qU(r). The kinetic energy is ½m v2 = p2/(2m), because pm v. The classical Hamiltonian is time-independent,

This example is simple, no symmetrization is necessary, since neither P2 nor V(R) involves products of non-commuting operators. Therefore:

X-representation

Quantum mechanics is often formulated in the so-called X-representation in which wave functions Ψ of N-particle systems are functions of the position vectors of the N particles,

In the X-representation the observables Rk act pointwise (are multiplicative operators) and the momentum operators Pk are given by differential operators

The one-particle kinetic energy operator is

The N-particle kinetic energy is

Other coordinate systems

When an expression is required for the kinetic energy in other coordinate systems than Cartesian, one must transform the gradient operator to the new coordinates and remember that an inner product involves, in general, a metric tensor g. Because the metric tensor is represented by the unit (identity) matrix in Cartesian coordinates, the latter fact is easily overlooked. One could go through the transformation for every coordinate system (cylinder, spherical, ellipsoidal, etc.) separately, but then one repeats the same calculation over and over again, with the only difference being the form of the metric tensor. In the 1860s this fact was recognized by the Italian mathematician Eugenio Beltrami[6], who gave once and for all the following expression for what is now known as the Laplace-Beltrami operator,

Here the coordinates are written as xj. For example, for spherical polar coordinates, x1r, x2 ≡ θ, x3 ≡ φ. The expression is valid for higher and lower dimensional systems as well. The quantity |g| is the determinant of the metric tensor g, and gjk stands for the (j, k) element of the inverse g−1.

In 1928 Podolsky[7] saw that the Beltrami form is the correct quantum mechanical operator for the kinetic energy in arbitrary curvilinear coordinates, provided the operator is multiplied by

In more general systems the mass m is often included in the metric tensor, then it must not be included in this factor.

Example: Sperical polar coordinates

The kinetic energy operator T of a single particle follows easily from the metric tensor derived in the article spherical polar coordinates:

The determinant is |g| = r4sin2 θ, so that

References

  1. M. Planck, Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteiling im Normalspectrum [On the energy distribution law in the normal spectrum], Annalen der Physik, vol. 4, pp. 553-563 (1901) Online. First presented on December 14, 1900 for the Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft.
  2. A. Einstein, Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt [On a heuristic point view regarding the creation and conversion of light], Annalen der Physik, vol. 17, pp. 132 - 148, online.
  3. For black-body radiation ν is about 5×1012 Hz, so that black-body photons have energies on the order of 3×10−21 J. Compare this with the kinetic energy (0.5 J) of a mass of 1 kg going with a speed of 1 m/s (3.6 km/h) and it is clear that energy quantization is completely negligible on a macroscopic scale.
  4. L. de Broglie, Waves and Quanta, Nature, vol. 112, October 13, 1923, p. 540 Online
  5. E. Schrödinger, Quantisierung als Eigenwerproblem [quantization as eigenvalue problem] Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge, Band 79, p. 361 (1926) Online
  6. E. Beltrami, Sulla teorica generale dei parametri diffferenziali, Memorie dell'Accademia delle Scienze dell'Istituto di Bologna, serie II, tomo VIII (1868), pp. 551–590. Online PDF of collected works (go 19 pages down)
  7. B. Podolsky,Quantum-Mechanically Correct Form of Hamiltonian Function for Conservative Systems Physical Review, vol. 32, pp. 812–816 (1928)