Monitor theory/Bibliography

From Citizendium, the Citizens' Compendium
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Talk
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
A list of key readings about Monitor theory.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
  • Gregg, K.R. (1984). 'Krashen's Monitor and Occam's Razar.' Applied Linguistics 5(2): 79-100.
  • Krashen, S.D. (1981a). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Elsevier. Online version available at Stephen Krashen's website.
  • Krashen, S.D. (1981b). 'Letter to the editor'. Language Learning 31(1): 217-221.
  • Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. Online version available at Stephen Krashen's website.
  • Krashen, S.D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York: Longman.
  • Krashen, S.D. (1996). 'The case for narrow listening.' System 24(1): 97-100.
  • Krashen, S.D. (2003). Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Krashen, S.D. & T.D. Terrell (1983). The Natural Approach. New York: Pergamon.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D.E. (1975). 'The acquisition ofgrammatical morphemes by adult ESL students.' TESOL Quarterly 9: 409-419.
  • Markee, N. (1997). Managing Curricular Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning Teaching. Oxford: Macmillan. 2nd edition.
  • VanPatten, B. and J. Williams (2015). 'Early theories in SLA.' In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories in Second Language Acquisition: an Introduction. New York: Routledge. pp.17-33. 2nd edition.
  • White, L. (1987). 'Against comprehensible input: the input hypothesis and the development of second language competence.' Applied Linguistics 8(2): 95-110.