# Lambert W function

The **Lambert W function** is used in mathematics to solve equations in which the unknown appears both outside and inside an exponential function or a logarithm, such as or . Such equations cannot otherwise, except in special cases, be solved explicitly in terms of algebraic operations, exponentials and logarithms.

## Contents

## Definition

The Lambert *W* function is defined as the multivalued function that satisfies

for any complex number . Equivalently, it may be defined as the inverse function of . Thus, the equation is by definition solved by . The multivaluedness of the Lambert *W* function means that there is generally more than one solution. The graph of the Lambert *W* function in the real numbers looks as follows:

The function has two real branches in the interval which join at . Concretely, this means that the equation has two real solutions if . For example, if (which is about half way between and 0), there is one solution that lies on the blue graph and another solution that lies on the dashed red graph.

The single-valued function corresponding to the blue graph for is called the *principal branch* of the Lambert *W* function and is denoted by . The single-valued function corresponding to the dashed red graph for is called the *negative branch*, denoted by . The negative branch goes to as while the principal branch grows slowly but unboundedly as .

The behavior of the Lambert *W* function can be understood by comparing it to the natural logarithm, the inverse of . For large negative or positive , and grow similarly, so their respective inverse functions have similar asymptotes as well (except for the sign when is negative). Multiplying the exponential by deforms its graph around zero so that it is no longer monotone, and that is why the Lambert *W* function has two real branches: one for values on each side of the stationary point. The following pair of graphs shows the relation between the two exponential functions (left graph) and their inverse functions (right graph):

Like the complex logarithm, the Lambert *W* function has infinitely many complex branches; they are conventionally labeled where runs over all the integers. The details are discussed for instance in Corless *et al*.^{[1]}

Besides , the Lambert *W* function has the special values and . The value is called the omega constant.

## Examples of use

The Lambert *W* function solves any equation of the form — we may call this the *canonical form*. Many other types of equations can be solved in terms of the Lambert *W* function as well, by using the rules of exponentials and logarithms to rewrite them in the canonical form. For example, the equation is solved by and is solved by

^{[1]}

Valluri *et al.* give the following example of an equation from physics that can be solved with the Lambert *W* function.^{[2]} Planck's law states that the radiation intensity at wavelength from a black body at temperature is given by

where is Planck's constant, is Boltzmann's constant and is the speed of light. Note that appears both inside and outside an exponential. Next, Wien's displacement law states that the maximum intensity is attained at the wavelength where is a quantity called Wien's displacement constant. Using the Lambert *W* function, we can give an explicit formula for .

To derive Wien's displacement law, we wish to solve . If we calculate the partial derivative, simplify, and perform the substitution , we obtain the equation . To write this in canonical form for application of the Lambert *W* function, we substitute and multiply both sides of the resulting equation by . This leaves , with the nonzero solution . Substituting back the expression for , we obtain Wien's displacement law with the value for Wien's constant given explicitly by

## Calculus

It is possible to do calculus with the Lambert *W* function much like with other elementary functions. Its properties can be derived from the familiar properties of exponentials and logarithms, although we have to use the theory of implicit functions since the Lambert *W* function is defined implicitly rather than by a direct formula.

Let us first consider limiting behavior. When discussing the graph of the Lambert *W* function, we said that its asymptotes are "similar" to those of the natural logarithm, since the exponential in dominates when is large. A more precise statement is that

By similar reasoning, the negative branch approaches the singularity at logarithmically:

However, the *absolute* difference between the Lambert *W* function and the natural logarithm, , diverges to infinity as . It is possible to give a more complicated asymptotic formula for the Lambert *W* function that eliminates this difference, in the form of an infinite series

where

and denotes a Stirling number of the first kind. The series is absolutely convergent for sufficiently large .^{[3]}

The Taylor series of the Lambert *W* function can be found by using the Lagrange inversion theorem to invert the series of . This way, we find that the principal branch of the Lambert *W* function has the Taylor series expansion

around . Due to the singularity at , and as can be proved with the ratio test, the series converges for . The Lambert *W* function further has the derivative

which is infinite at the branch point . The indefinite integral is given by

It is also possible to find integrals of more complicated expressions containing the Lambert *W* function. See Corless *et al*. for an overview.^{[1]}

## Numerical calculation

The value of can be calculated by using a regular root-finding algorithm to solve the equation for . Since the left-hand side has simple derivatives, Newton's method and Halley's method are both good choices. Halley's method amounts to iterating

for . The initial value must be chosen carefully in order to end up on the correct branch. To calculate real values on the principal branch, any real number above will work, but faster convergence is obtained by taking the initial value from an interpolating function around 0 for small arguments and a few terms of the asymptotic series for large arguments. With a sufficiently accurate initial value, a few iterations of Halley's method will give a value that is correct to full precision in ordinary floating-point arithmetic.

Of course, we could use standard root-finding techniques to solve equations without going through the trouble of rewriting them in terms of the Lambert *W* function. From the numerical point of view, the advantage of using the Lambert *W* function is that highly optimized implementations that have been tested for correctness are available; further, those implementations allow the user to select a complex branch of choice.

## History and application

Equations of the kind that can be solved analytically with the Lambert *W* function are common in mathematics and science, yet the utility of such a function was not realized until recently. The Lambert *W* function was introduced in the 1980's as a function in the Maple computer algebra system, whose interface required an explicit notation for solutions of equations. The function's history highlights the importance of good mathematical notation: due to previously not being recognized as a function in its own right, it had not been studied systematically, despite its most important properties requiring only elementary complex analysis. An account of the function and its history that helped popularize it is given in a 1996 paper by R. M. Corless *et al.* (with Donald Knuth a notable co-author).^{[1]}

The basic theory behind the Lambert *W* function was investigated in 1779 by Leonhard Euler.^{[4]} The Maple developers chose the name of Johann Heinrich Lambert instead of Euler's since Euler had referenced work by Lambert in his paper, and possibly because "naming yet another function after Euler would not be useful".^{[3]}

Since its introduction, the Lambert *W* function has been applied to problems ranging from quantum physics to population dynamics to the complexity of algorithms. Cranmer^{[5]} discusses the application of the Lambert *W* function in solar wind physics and writes in the conclusion: "The Lambert *W* function used in these solutions was defined and publicized only about a decade ago, but it has rapidly become a convenient tool for mathematical physicists. The elegance of explicit solutions to equations thought previously to be expressible only implicitly is clear, but there also are many practical benefits to having explicit solutions as well."

Since century 21, the Lambert W function is implemented as special function in the programming languages such as Mathematica, Maple, Matlab. In Mathematica, the call of this function with argumenr may look as
or
.
In the case of two arguments, the first indicates the number of branch; corresponds to the principal branch shown in the complex map at the top. In Mathematica, the name **ProductLog** is interpreted as an equivalent of the **LambertW**. For C++, the expression of the principal branch through the Tania function can be used, .

## See also

## References

- ↑
^{1.0}^{1.1}^{1.2}^{1.3}Corless, R. M., Gonnet, G. H., Hare, D. E. G., Jeffrey, D. J. & Knuth, D. E. (1996). "On the Lambert W function".*Adv. Computational Maths.***5**, 329–359 - ↑ Valluri, S. R., Jeffrey, D. R. & Corless, R. M. (2000). "Some applications of the Lambert
*W*function to physics".*Can. J. Phys.***78**, 823–831 - ↑
^{3.0}^{3.1}Corless, R., Jeffrey, D. & Knuth, D. E. (1997). "A Sequence of Series for the Lambert*W*Function", ISSAC: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAM International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (formerly SYMSAM, SYMSAC, EUROSAM, EUROCAL) (also sometimes in cooperation with the Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation Groupe in Europe (SAME)) - ↑ Euler, L. (1779). "De serie Lambertina plurimisque eius insignibus proprietatibus". Originally published in
*Acta Academiae Scientarum Imperialis Petropolitinae*1779, 1783, 29–51. Also in*Opera Omnia*: Series 1, Volume 6, pp. 350 - 369. See E532 in The Euler Archive for a scanned copy. - ↑ Cranmer, S. R. (2004). "New views of the solar wind with the Lambert
*W*function".*Am. J. Phys.***72**, 1397