Citizendium - a community developing a quality comprehensive compendium of knowledge, online and free.
Click here to join and contribute—free
CZ thanks our previous donors. Donate here. Treasurer's Financial Report -- Thanks to our content contributors. --

Difference between revisions of "Talk:United States Air Force"

From Citizendium
Jump to: navigation, search
(Trying to understand if there is a standard on when to abbreaviate national names)
(Out of date numbers--anyone want to help?: new section)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
:::Where should the line be drawn between abbreviating and not? A colleague does tell me that they do use FYRBH in the Balkans. If they didn't, they'd have to have extra-long business cards. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 14:44, 12 May 2008 (CDT)
 
:::Where should the line be drawn between abbreviating and not? A colleague does tell me that they do use FYRBH in the Balkans. If they didn't, they'd have to have extra-long business cards. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 14:44, 12 May 2008 (CDT)
 +
::Oh it's a matter of style. It's done by the U.S. Congress for example, And yes, UK is better than United Kingdom, I think; compare USA, USSR, GDR, FRG, ROK, etc. (I strongly dislike the use of "United States" as an adjective but will accept "U.S." as an adjective)  The Air Force in fact tried to never call itself the ARMY Air Forces--always the AAF. People adverse to acronyms wash out of the military on day 1. :) (No I have never been in uniform, but I was a civlian professor at USMA (ie West Point) [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 16:32, 12 May 2008 (CDT)
 +
 +
:::There is style, and there is style. From a number of years of experience, I believe the United States Navy has the edge on acronyms. Even though I was in a vault at a Navy facility at the time, I still did a doubletake when I read COMNAVSECGRUACTPACDET and realized I knew what it meant. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 01:16, 16 May 2008 (CDT)
 +
 +
== Organizational question (also to forum and mailing list) ==
 +
 +
Does anyone know if PACAF and USAFE report directly to USAF headquarters, or if they are intermediate levels below ACC? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 19:26, 5 August 2008 (CDT)
 +
 +
== Out of date numbers--anyone want to help? ==
 +
 +
I removed a table that had nothing later than five year old personnel figures.  All the numbers on personnel and equipment need updating.
 +
 +
Several changes may be worth mentioning, variously as due to arms control agreements or mission changes. I will try to move aircraft types to a table format, with counts in service where available. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 13:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:05, 25 March 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Gallery [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition One of the uniformed services of the United States, with principal responsibility for land-based long-range and high-performance aircraft, as well as land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Military [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  United States Air Force
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Title suggestions

I suggest that for this (and similar articles) we use for the title U.S. instead of United States.

Also for spinoff article, I suggest we use USAF in the title, as in USAF, history

Note that policy for all history article is to have titles like "France, history" Richard Jensen 11:08, 12 May 2008 (CDT)

Air warfare vice air superiority

First, I changed "air superiority" to "air warfare". The former sounds just fine for the fighter mafia saying "not a pound for air to ground", but not in a broader context. See air warfare planning for such a context.

As to United States vs. U.S., given your example with France, History, why abbreviate one and not the other (IK, I grant things like "The Former Yugoslav Republic of Bosnia and Heregovina")?

Howard C. Berkowitz 14:22, 12 May 2008 (CDT)

ok how about U.S. Air Force, history -- but also USAF when it's ana djective (USAF Academy). Richard Jensen 14:25, 12 May 2008 (CDT)
What do you see as the problem of spelling out "United States"?
                                                 "United Kingdom" is longer. Will that be UK?  
Where should the line be drawn between abbreviating and not? A colleague does tell me that they do use FYRBH in the Balkans. If they didn't, they'd have to have extra-long business cards. Howard C. Berkowitz 14:44, 12 May 2008 (CDT)
Oh it's a matter of style. It's done by the U.S. Congress for example, And yes, UK is better than United Kingdom, I think; compare USA, USSR, GDR, FRG, ROK, etc. (I strongly dislike the use of "United States" as an adjective but will accept "U.S." as an adjective) The Air Force in fact tried to never call itself the ARMY Air Forces--always the AAF. People adverse to acronyms wash out of the military on day 1. :) (No I have never been in uniform, but I was a civlian professor at USMA (ie West Point) Richard Jensen 16:32, 12 May 2008 (CDT)
There is style, and there is style. From a number of years of experience, I believe the United States Navy has the edge on acronyms. Even though I was in a vault at a Navy facility at the time, I still did a doubletake when I read COMNAVSECGRUACTPACDET and realized I knew what it meant. Howard C. Berkowitz 01:16, 16 May 2008 (CDT)

Organizational question (also to forum and mailing list)

Does anyone know if PACAF and USAFE report directly to USAF headquarters, or if they are intermediate levels below ACC? Howard C. Berkowitz 19:26, 5 August 2008 (CDT)

Out of date numbers--anyone want to help?

I removed a table that had nothing later than five year old personnel figures. All the numbers on personnel and equipment need updating.

Several changes may be worth mentioning, variously as due to arms control agreements or mission changes. I will try to move aircraft types to a table format, with counts in service where available. Howard C. Berkowitz 13:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)