Difference between revisions of "CZ Talk:Literature Workgroup"

From Citizendium
Jump to: navigation, search
(Are all workgroup discussions this slow?: new section)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
:Hi Russel and Carmen. Thanks much. I addressed Russel's referencing concern at [[Talk:Bonny_Hicks]]. I did copyedit the article some more but have probably exhausted my own ability at such for now by reason of my proximal investment in the article. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 19:08, 14 January 2007 (CST)
 
:Hi Russel and Carmen. Thanks much. I addressed Russel's referencing concern at [[Talk:Bonny_Hicks]]. I did copyedit the article some more but have probably exhausted my own ability at such for now by reason of my proximal investment in the article. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 19:08, 14 January 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
== Are all workgroup discussions this slow? ==
 +
 +
I joined, but what's the point of the workgroup, if there's no collaboration? [[User:Kevin Scott Bailey|Kevin Scott Bailey]] 02:59, 1 December 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 08:59, 1 December 2007

Thanks for creating this workgroup. I look forwarding to taking part in it.--Jason Sanford 09:30, 21 November 2006 (CST)


Jason, do join the discussion on the Forum Amal Chatterjee 14:05, 21 November 2006 (CST)

Bonnie Hicks

I know that Sanger has urged authors to focus on major articles, but circumstances in my life have occurred such that I needed a good grasp of the Singaporean author Bonnie Hicks. I therefore thought I would contribute this article to maximize my labor. I am unsure exactly how the approved article nomination works - specifically, whether or not authors as well as editors can so nominate - but I did nominate this article. While the article could go into considerable more detail, I do not think that is appropriate in this case. So here we have my first significant contribution to CZ - one I would never have prior foreseen. Stephen Ewen 02:15, 14 January 2007 (CST)

Though not familiar with Bonnie Hicks, the article looks well-written and well-researched indeed. Will keep an eye on Hicks in the future - yet another advantage of being part of this! --CM 05:29, 14 January 2007 (CST)

Minor revisions

I just read through the article, which indeed seems to me to be well-researched and amply documented. I have made just two small stylistic revisions, and I think there may be a few other places where a kind of 'copy-editing' editing could strengthen the overall flow of the article. I don't know enough about Hicks to comment on any substantive matters, though I do have some background in, and occasionally teach, postcolonial literature.

Russell Potter 07:32, 14 January 2007 (CST)

Hi Russel and Carmen. Thanks much. I addressed Russel's referencing concern at Talk:Bonny_Hicks. I did copyedit the article some more but have probably exhausted my own ability at such for now by reason of my proximal investment in the article. Stephen Ewen 19:08, 14 January 2007 (CST)

Are all workgroup discussions this slow?

I joined, but what's the point of the workgroup, if there's no collaboration? Kevin Scott Bailey 02:59, 1 December 2007 (CST)