User talk:Russell D. Jones: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones
imported>Russell D. Jones
(Links)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Editor Policy}}
#REDIRECT [[User:Russell D. Jones/Talk]]
{{Getting Started}}
{{TOC|right}}
See Also [[User talk:Russell D. Jones/Archive 1]]
 
==Welcome!==
'''Welcome to the ''Citizendium!'''''  We hope you will contribute [[CZ:Be Bold|boldly]] and well.  You'll probably want to know [[CZ:The Author Role|how to get started as an author]].  Just look at [[CZ:Getting Started]] for other helpful "startup" links, and [[CZ:Home]] for the top menu of community pages.  Be sure to stay abreast of events via [https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list] (do join!) and [http://blog.citizendium.org the blog].  Please also join the [[CZ:Mailing lists|workgroup mailing list(s)]] that concern your particular interests.  You can test out [[CZ:How to edit an article|editing]] in the [[CZ:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like.  If you need help to get going, the [http://forum.citizendium.org/ forums] is one option.  That's also where we discuss policy and proposals.  You can ask any [[:Category:CZ Constables|constable]] for help, too.  Me, for instance!  Just put a note on their "talk" page.  Again, welcome and have fun! [[User:Dan Nachbar|Dan Nachbar]] 14:07, 17 November 2007 (CST)
 
== Welcome and thanks ==
 
I'm just spending some time this morning thanking the newer/returned people who did weekend wiki work.  So, thanks, nice to have you here! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:17, 19 November 2007 (CST)
 
== Welcome Back! ==
Welcome back! two items:
# can we make you an editor? CZ policy requires three editors approve history articles and the others have vanished on us so we need your help.
# how can we link CZ with the [http://edit.emich.edu EMU History Wiki] ?? have you seen our Eduzendium project? see http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Citizendium_Press_Releases/Jan242008
We'd love to have your students write CZ articles. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 16:18, 18 February 2008 (CST)
:My fear is <!--And I've told Larry this-->that I'd be just another absentee editor.  I'm not here enough to be doing an editor's job.  How dire is the situation?  Are you the only historian/editor? [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 20:55, 18 February 2008 (CST)
::in practice, yes...alas. (N=15 nominally) dire.  But the excitement is to get students to work.  I'm retired but next week will be talking to a VPAA about my teaching a historiography course in which the kids write CZ articles. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 23:00, 18 February 2008 (CST)
:::I don't mean to eavesdrop exactly, but Richard, the latter is great news!  I hope you can swing it. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 23:06, 18 February 2008 (CST)
::::Sure, I'll apply.
:::::Hey great! we'll try not to seize your weekends and summer vacations. :) [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 20:31, 19 February 2008 (CST)
::::::Yes, great, nice to have you on board, Russell! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 22:00, 19 February 2008 (CST)
 
{{ewelcome}} --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 21:45, 19 February 2008 (CST)
 
 
== You made my day ==
 
I needed a good chuckle!  [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Talk:Democrat_Party_%28phrase%29/Draft&diff=next&oldid=100542073 Thanks for that!] Lord knows I've been there and got the T-shirt!  [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 00:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
:Happy to please. :)  BTW, I had sauteed snowpeas with julianned onion and pepper and two varieties of broccoli over pasta.  I feel much better now.  --[[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 01:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 
== Approval nomination for [[Grand Trunk Railway]] ==
 
Russell, I responded at [[Talk:Grand Trunk Railway]] to your request that I look at the subject article. Regards, [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 22:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 
==Kamehameha I==
In my opinion, [[Kamehameha I]] is as close to being "complete" as it can be. I think I have covered all major aspects of his life. I am asking you four; Joe Quick (as approvals manager), Roger A. Lohmann (as a history and politics editor), Russell Jones (as a history editor), and Howard Berkowitz (as a military editor), to look over the article and suggest any changes you think necessary. Between the five of us, I don't see why we can't get this article improved. Thanks for your time. [[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 09:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 
== new editor ==
 
We have a [[User:Carl_Patrick_Burrowes|new editor]] in the history, journalism, and media workgroups. He seems like just the right person to oversee the approval of [[moving panorama]], which was written primarily by another history editor named Russell quite a while ago and seems very good to me.  Since he's brand new, I thought maybe you could offer to be a sort of mentor for his first approval. You could also be a co-approver. I haven't said anything to him yet.  --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 13:27, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 
== Articles on books... ==
 
I'd like to write an article on a book I recently read, ''The Age of Ra'' by James Lovegrove, and I wanted to take the time to ask a couple people about the mechanics of articles about books.
 
# Are plot summaries ok?
# Are lists of Characters ok, main characters or otherwise?
# Is it ok to take a picture of the front cover to use as a picture for the article?
# Is it ok to include an average retail price?
 
and finally
 
If included, should any of these things be put on a subpage?
 
Thanks Russell - [[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 05:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 
== Is there a Technology subgroup?? ==
 
Russell, I noted your mention of a Technology subgroup on Howard's Talk page. Is there such a subgroup? What workgroup(s) is/are it affiliated with? Is there a list somewhere of all the subgroups? [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 18:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 
I was proposing to Howard a [[CZ:History of Technology Subgroup]].  There is not one to my knowledge, but there should be one.  Interested?  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 18:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 
:Perhaps. I'll think about it. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 19:07, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 
== Image Transparency Problem ==
 
<div style="border:1px #bbb solid; background-color:yellow; -moz-border-radius:4px; -webkit-border-radius:4px; width:50%; height:280px; "><br>
 
{{Image|Spaceship EarthView.jpg|left|250px|<center>HELP!</center>}}
 
</div>
Here's the problem: there is a bunch of white space around the image.  How do I make the white space go away?  In other words, how do I make the image transparent to the background?
 
Related: how do I make TOC's transparent as well?
 
To see my problem, look at [http://edit.emich.edu/index.php?title=First_Airplane_Flights this page].
 
Thanks, all.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 18:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 
:Its a problem with the thumbnail. If you had used a non thumb image the whitespace wouldn't be there.
<div style="border:1px #bbb solid; background-color:yellow; -moz-border-radius:4px; -webkit-border-radius:4px; width:50%; height:280px; "><br>
 
[[Image:Spaceship EarthView.jpg|left|250px|Example: But where's the caption?]]
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>{{box|A simple but not very desirable solution|width=234px|white}}
</div>
 
I'm still investigating how to thumbnail it without the whitespace. Be back soon. [[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 03:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 
:From our friends at "The Other Place" (personally I hate using that phrase) I found that it is a mediawiki wide problem that mediawiki doesn't seem concerned about. There may be obscure tricks to get rid of it, but I can't find any. [[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 03:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 
::But removing the frame or thumb also removes the caption! [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 13:32, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 
:::I have a simple, though probably not a very desirable solution. See above. I still haven't figured out how to remove the whitespace around a thumb. As I said before, it is a mediawiki problem, and they don't seem very concerned about it. I haven't even found any backdoor's or tricks to do it, which I'm usually pretty good at finding. I'll keep looking though. [[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 09:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 
<div style="border:1px #bbb solid; background-color:yellow; -moz-border-radius:4px; -webkit-border-radius:4px; width:50%; height:280px; "><br>
 
{{box|[[Image:Spaceship EarthView.jpg|left|250px|Example: But where's the caption?]]
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><center>A better but still not very desirable solution</center>|width=250px|white}}
</div>
 
Aha! You can box the whole thing (picture and caption) for the same effect as a thumbnail minus whitespace. Still not as easy as a normal thumbnail, but it works. [[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 09:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 
"Related: how do I make TOC's transparent as well?" - Not sure what you mean. If you mean non-existant its pretty simple. If you mean see through I haven't the foggiest, but could probably find out. [[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 09:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
::::==>Drew, like an image, a TOC is place in a box with a white background that is opaque to the background.  12:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 
:Thanks, Drew.  I've posted the question at MediaWiki help too, but they weren't as speedy or as helpful as you.  Thanks.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 11:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 
::Drew, [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help_talk:Images#Frame_transparancy check out this CSS solution]. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 13:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 
Okay.  Drew, you put me on a path to a work-around.  Here:
 
<div style="border:1px #bbb solid; background-color:yellow; -moz-border-radius:4px; -webkit-border-radius:4px; width:50%; height:280px; "><br>
<div style="float:left; Margin:1em;"><div style="float:left; width:100px">[[Image:Spaceship EarthView.jpg|100px]]</div><br/><div style="float:left; width:100px"><small>A picture of the Earth and Moon from space.  NASA photograph.</small></div></div>Attempts by humans to travel above Earth's surface had been made for hundreds of years. Evidence of mankind's serious study of flight was discovered in 1898 in an Egyptian tomb in the form of a winged wooden model, dated 200 BC, that reportedly was truly a flyable model, curiously designed without birdlike claws and unlike birds, had a vertical tail.
</div>
I now have to rewrite the image function as a template to see if that will work, e.g., <nowiki>{{Image|Spaceship EarthView.jpg|alignment|size|caption}}</nowiki>
 
And if you are using the Pinkwich5 skin (I don't which is why I put the yellow background around the above examples) here it is again:
 
----
<div style="float:left; Margin:1em;"><div style="float:left; width:100px">[[Image:Spaceship EarthView.jpg|100px]]</div><br/><div style="float:left; width:100px"><small>A picture of the Earth and Moon from space.  NASA photograph.</small></div></div>Attempts by humans to travel above Earth's surface had been made for hundreds of years. Evidence of mankind's serious study of flight was discovered in 1898 in an Egyptian tomb in the form of a winged wooden model, dated 200 BC, that reportedly was truly a flyable model, curiously designed without birdlike claws and unlike birds, had a vertical tail. <br><br><br><br><br>
----
 
I'm not sure how this looks on your browser, but on Opera and Google chrome it's simply horrendous. Still, if it works for your other-wiki needs, go right ahead.
 
Well maybe in Opera.  This page looks pretty much the same in Chrome.  The first flights page, I had to scale up the page until the images looked right.  I have to scale up everything on the web anyway because you young people make everything so small here in cyberspace.  But I see what you meant.  I also found out that Chrome won't load my site's changes to the monobook skin, so I'm stuck with the crappy WP presentation through chrome.  And on pages that have a lot of images, they tend to pile up across the screen and push text around.  No, it's not the perfect solution, but it's better than these white holes in the page.  But, if I can't get my changes to monobook to take, this is all pointless.
 
Here's what it looks like in Opera [[Image:Opera problems.jpg|250px|right]] and Chrome [[Image:Chrome problems.jpg|250px|right]]
 
Admittedly, Chrome at least has the text under the pic, but wouldn't it be better with a frame? The text below the pic without a frame makes them seem almost, ''almost'', unconnected. [[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 04:55, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 
:Yes, I know.  I'd like a frame too.  But my job queue length right now is enormous.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]]
 
==Pinkwich5 Skin==
For anyone who is in the know: How does the Pinkwich5 skin get the gradient backgrounds?  I can get the Gray-to-white background to work fine in the outside (header and menu) space.  But my gradient for the white-to-gray background in the text space stops halfway down a page.  [http://edit.emich.edu/index.php?title=First_Airplane_Flights See this example.]  Any advice?  Thanks.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 15:02, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 
:Hmmmm. Where do I get the Pinkwich skin?  I guess if I had that, some of my problems would be solved.
 
::Go to "my preferences" at the top of your pages, click on "Skin" and make your selection. '''Be sure to read the Note at the bottom of the list of skins.'''
 
::Personally, I use IE6 as my browser and the Monobook skin and there is no visible white space around any photos or other images. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 15:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Yes, that's because the both the whitespace and the monobook text space are both white.  But in the Pinkwich skin, the text space is not white; it is a gradient.
 
Um, that wasn't my question.  Where to I acquire the pinkwich skin so that I can install it on my own mediawiki site?  That's my question (I think).  A google search gives me a lot of discussion about it but no purveyor.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 15:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 
:The example you showed occurs when there's a problem in the .css file for the skin. I wouldn't be able to tell you exactly what the problem is without looking at the file (and maybe not even then), but I would guess that the gradient is set to go to a certain number of pixels, instead of a certain percent of the page. I've looked at other pages, and on the shorter ones the problem doesn't occur, or if it does, it's much closer to the bottom. [[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 04:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 
::One other thing. I've recently learned how to do some digital image restoration, so if you (or anyone else) wants an image "tuned-up" give me a shout. I took the liberty of doing a small restoration of the flying machine blueprints, but I could do a much better job with a svg png or tiff image. The most noticeable difference is the rotation of the pic isn't off anymore. I also did a little patching up around the edges, where the rotation distorted some of the color. Take a look and tell me what you think. [[Image:Flying Machine.png|right]] [[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 05:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Okay, I found a better source image for the file and did a minor restoration on that one. [[Image:Flying Machine2.jpg|right]][[User:Drew R. Smith|Drew R. Smith]] 06:11, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 
== Charter drafting candidacy ==
 
Hi Russell,
 
Thanks for accepting your nomination to be a candidate for election to the drafting committee for the Citizendium charter.
 
If you'd like, there is a provision in the plan that provides a place for you to compose a position statement.  You are not required to do this in order to be a candidate for election to the committee, but it would be helpful to others during the voting period.  Even if you don't compose a statement before the election period concludes, should you be elected it might be helpful for other members of the committee to know what you feel are the most important issues to address with the draft.  You can find a red link to the page where you can write your statement [[CZ:Charter_drafting_committee/Position_statements|here]], along with instructions for doing so.
 
If you have any questions, just let me know. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 15:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 
==Article approvals sought==
Hi - I have done as much as I can with two articles, [[Scarborough Castle]] and [[Great Siege of Scarborough Castle]] (specifically the versions [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Scarborough_Castle&oldid=100580840 here] and [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Great_Siege_of_Scarborough_Castle&oldid=100580829 here]), and am looking to move these articles into 'approved' status. I made sure to use only authoritative sources (published books, English Heritage castle literature, things like that). Can you have a look and see if you feel that there is anything preventing them being approved? Thanks. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 06:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 
== another article to consider for approval ==
First, thanks for getting [[Scarborough Castle]] headed for approval.  I announced the nomination on the History Workgroup mailing list with the hope that it will draw a little attention.  I don't know how many people are actually signed up for that list, but it has to reach at least someone.
 
One goal of mine as Approvals Manager is to get at least one article in every workgroup approved, but there are several workgroups that don't have any approved articles yet.  Linguistics is one of those.  I think our best shot is [[Noah Webster]], since it's also listed in History.  It was originally a Wikipedia import, so it might need a little work, but I think we could find someone to give it a little attention if necessary.  What do you think? --Joe ([[User:Approvals Manager|Approvals Manager]]) 04:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 
:I've gone over it, cleaned it up a bit, but there are problems.  See [[Talk:Noah Webster]].  But I have a larger prejudice in that I'm very reluctant to approve something that has been written someplace else. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 00:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 
== "Britain, history"- dispute  over title ==
 
I should appreciate your intervention to resolve the dispute that has developed concerning the title of the article on [[Britain, history]]. I fear that  the recent alteration will strike readers as absurd. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 22:55, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 
Thank you [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 22:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 
I hope that it meets with your approval.  You've put a lot of effort into the article over the past years or so. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 23:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 
:I am afraid that it hadn't occurred to me that "Britain" can be taken to exclude Northern Ireland.  My fellow - English contacts do not interpret it  that way in  colloquial conversation, but it seems that Ulstermen do - and, on reflection, I have to admit that strictly speaking they are right.  (I believe that the derivation of "Britain" goes back to the Romans - who did not invade Ireland). Anyway, I am sure that you have made the right choice, and I should welcome any other criticisms of the article that you have time to make.[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 11:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 
== Is school out for the summer? ==
 
Good to see your name poppin up! [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 22:08, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 
Thanks.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]]
 
==[[Great Siege of Scarborough Castle]]==
Hi, Russell. I am calling it editor help about this article - there there is some discussion of whether and how to approve it [[Talk:Great Siege of Scarborough Castle#Approval|here]]. Can you find any problems or reasons not to proceed? Thanks. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 09:22, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
:I've looked it over and sent you my comments. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 12:56, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 
==Battle of Britain==
(writing here as I'm getting system error messages on my talk page)
 
To the best of my recollection, I wrote it from scratch after an ... exchange of views ... with Jensen. Actually, I first wrote a BoB section in [[radar]], and also may have written [[integrated air defense system]] and [[suppression of enemy air defense]].
 
These days, I consciously don't even look at the WP article when I start an article; I may not have kept such a "firewall" then.
 
It would be nice to move toward Approval, and perhaps even some of the Related Articles, both the technical and historical. I do see some new error messages that might be due to the software changes. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 22:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 
==Approvals==
'''I.'''&emsp;&emsp;I'm starting the Approval process for the revision of [[Richard Hofstadter]], and made a bunch of minor editorial revisions. Please read and let me know if you have any problems with them. I tried not to change any content, just concentrate on syntax, except that i made substantial changes to the handling of the first and last sentences. Let me know if you have a problem with this (or better yet, change them back if I've messed up the meaning). I'm waiting to hear from Constable Matt about the procedure, and then, as noted, Howard will join me in recommending it.
 
'''II.'''&emsp;&emsp;I will get [[Edwin E. Witte]] started toward Approval also. Would you care to see if you might approve [[Arthur J. Altmeyer]]?
 
We might also ask Howard if he would care to join either or both?
[[User:Roger A. Lohmann|Roger A. Lohmann]] 18:59, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
===Update===
I just heard from Matt. He interprets my contributions as authorial as well, but recommends a three-editor solution, in which you and I and Howard all join in the Approval this time. Since the article was originated by Richard Jensen, that makes sense to me. I think I will post the permalink to the current version and a note on the Talk Page indicating I recommend it for approval. If you and Howard can add your assent on the Talk Page, we should be home free. (Or, if you have any problems with the latest version, we can revise, update the link and then indicate approval.
[[User:Roger A. Lohmann|Roger A. Lohmann]] 19:10, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
== History of geniuses ==
 
Hi Russell, just stumbled upon [http://www.monad.com/sdg/Journal/genius.html this] and thought it may be of interest to you. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 21:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
:Heh! In my case, I've never considered it a problem!  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 21:19, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 
== Please check [[Glass-Steagall Act of 1932]] ==
 
Please check the lede changes I made here. I'm not a professional economist, but I see the repeal of most of Glass-Steagall by the [[Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act]] as the start of a slide to today's chaos.
 
A credit-default swap is not unreasonable as long as it is adequately collateralized (not quite the word I want) by the participants. The crisis came about partially because new financial instruments were being created in an environment where no regulation applied, and there was no one to ask the question, "are these being designed on an overly optimistic model?" [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 09:33, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:Howard, I'm going to revert your edits on the [[Glass-Steagall Act of 1932]] because I think you confused the 1932 act with the 1933 act of the same name.  Please see my lede to the [[Glass-Steagall Act]].  Also the changes you made were already covered in the "Later History" section of [[Glass-Steagall Act]] and the [[Banking Act of 1933]].  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 13:01, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
:From what I understand, only two paragraphs of GSA (the Banking Act) were repealed by GLBA (albeit, those two paragraphs were substantially the main points of GSA); so it would be inappropriate to say "... repeal of most of ...."  I have no idea how/why the current fiasco started, but am sure that the gold standard had nothing to do with it (as it did in 1929).  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 12:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 
::OK. Didn't realize there were two acts.
 
::Why did the current fiasco take place? May I suggest confusing the more exotic financial instrument market with a casino, a casino with incompetent bookies who didn't close bets when they could no longer cover the spread? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 13:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 
== Oops! ==
I forgot I wasn't a constable anymore!  I deleted your charter page :O  [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 02:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
:That's okay.  I'm glad someone did it; I've got a second RFD out there, too.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 02:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 
== Federal Reserve notes ==
In order to make your recent "[[Federal Reserve notes/Definition]]" work as a lemma article, should the older "[[Federal Reserve notes]]" (which says "moolah" etc.) now be speedydeleted so that the new definition will show up where appropriate? [[User:Bruce M. Tindall|Bruce M. Tindall]] 18:13, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
:I'm not partial to it.  Do with it as you please.  Moolah is a place holder.  It would be best, though, if you replaced moolah with some copy about Federal Reserve notes.  I'm sure you can add a couple of sentences off the top of your head.  Best, [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 18:36, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
::Done. Now, when do I get my free samples? [[User:Bruce M. Tindall|Bruce M. Tindall]] 19:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
:::You're on your own there, fella!  Just remember your friends when you get them.  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 18:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
== No problems==
No problems here and thanks for asking. Have a super day![[User:Mary Ash|Mary Ash]] 22:41, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 
== History editor input needed ==
 
There is a complex controversy over appropriate terminology and neutrality policy starting in the article on [[Josef Mengele]] and spilling over to [[War crime]] and perhaps other places I am not aware of. Input from history editors might be helpful. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 03:20, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
:Okay, I don't see the problem with [[War crime]].  Mengele is going to take some time to read and it's time for me to punch the clock, so I'll have to do it tomorrow. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 03:49, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 
:: To see the problem with [[war crime]], you'd need to look at the history, talk page, & talk page archive. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 04:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 
:::Thank you. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 13:58, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
<!--
:::Obviously unofficial, but I am continuing to improve the non-stub war crimes at [[User: Howard C. Berkowitz/W]] and Mengele at [[User: Howard C. Berkowitz/M]]. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 04:44, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 
::::There seems to be a lack of current information here.
::::Just to clarify, so there’s no misunderstanding or hard feeling, this issue is above editor input level.
::::This matter has gone to the ME and the Ombudsman, and is currently before the EC as Case http://locke.citizendium.org/cz_ec/DR-2010-001.
::::I believe that due to the time zone difference, the EC Secretary will have retired already, which is the reason I’m commenting.
::::I am sure the EC will contact Dr Jones officially should his input be needed.
::::[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 05:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::Now, I didn't post a request, but are you saying that no one can comment or read the materials without EC approval, if it's simply a matter of interest? Although no rules have been written for the procedure, are you saying that the accused could not seek opinions? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 05:13, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 
::::I believe my words were clear. [[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 05:19, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 
I do not accept that anything is "above the editor input level", or for that matter above comment by non-editor citizens. It may be out of scope for an editor decision, as this appears to be, but not for input.
 
The Charter says "Whenever possible, disputes shall be settled informally at the lowest possible level by subject matter Editors." In my view, this dispute should obviously have gone there first. I do not at all regret trying to involve these editors, only that I did so rather late. They are, after all, the experts on the issues at hand. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 05:46, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 
:But one aspect of the dispute is which workgroups the articles should be in, and hence which editors might have authority. Only the EC could decide that authoritatively. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
::Given that the disputant took it to the ME immediately, and subsequently rejected the role of the Ombudsman, i have to say that I find Sandy's position quite incomprehensible. The matter has gone to the Editorial Council, and that is that. Any Citizen is, of course, perfectly entitled to consult any Editor in any workgroup for advice and opinion; however, it is a matter of common courtesy to inform that person that he or she is potentially getting involved in a formal dispute procedure of CZ. [[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 13:04, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
-->

Latest revision as of 13:03, 23 April 2011

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Russell_D._Jones&oldid=340522"