Talk:Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(Talk page generated using Special:MetadataForm)
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== This needs substantial work ==
From memory, there were at least two major trials, TIMI and TIMI2. I believe there were some followon multicenter trials that didn't perpetuate the TIMI name but are logical extensions.
I did a quick cut-and-paste of two outcomes, in uncategorized articles, about TIMI. My recollection is that TIMI material is scattered into several articles, and it needs some careful discussion how to structure it. Some may be better in general [[myocardial infarction]] articles; we may want multiple articles on thrombolysis, variously coronary, cerebral, peripheral, etc.
My suggestion is that there be a discussion with Health Sciences Editors and Authors familiar with both the relevant cardiology and emergency medicine, and even prehospital thrombolysis. --[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 09:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:25, 10 October 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition (TIMI) a set of randomized clinical trials and clinical guidelines for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with thrombolytic enzymes [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Health Sciences [Editors asked to check categories]
 Subgroup category:  Cardiology
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

This needs substantial work

From memory, there were at least two major trials, TIMI and TIMI2. I believe there were some followon multicenter trials that didn't perpetuate the TIMI name but are logical extensions.

I did a quick cut-and-paste of two outcomes, in uncategorized articles, about TIMI. My recollection is that TIMI material is scattered into several articles, and it needs some careful discussion how to structure it. Some may be better in general myocardial infarction articles; we may want multiple articles on thrombolysis, variously coronary, cerebral, peripheral, etc.

My suggestion is that there be a discussion with Health Sciences Editors and Authors familiar with both the relevant cardiology and emergency medicine, and even prehospital thrombolysis. --Howard C. Berkowitz 09:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC)