Talk:Stage (geology): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nereo Preto
(definition or article?)
 
imported>Nereo Preto
(checklist (test))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Stage
|                cat1 = Earth Sciences
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = n
|                  by = [[User:Nereo Preto|Nereo Preto]] 14:09, 8 March 2007 (CST)
}}
This article is really short, it is almost a definition. I really cannot figure out if it is ok to have it in CZ. I posted it because it is necessary to "read" stratigraphy article as, e.g, [[chronostratigraphy]].
This article is really short, it is almost a definition. I really cannot figure out if it is ok to have it in CZ. I posted it because it is necessary to "read" stratigraphy article as, e.g, [[chronostratigraphy]].



Revision as of 15:09, 8 March 2007


Article Checklist for "Stage (geology)"
Workgroup category or categories Earth Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Nereo Preto 14:09, 8 March 2007 (CST)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This article is really short, it is almost a definition. I really cannot figure out if it is ok to have it in CZ. I posted it because it is necessary to "read" stratigraphy article as, e.g, chronostratigraphy.

There is a supposedly article on this topic in WP which is rather long: faunal stage. However, that text is really about the concept of biozone, and is a little confused in my view.

Maybe I could add some lines to the article, but I wonder if there is really something else which is essential to say... any suggestions?

Same for Age (geology), of course. I didn't post a comment there, though.

Ciao, Nereo Preto 11:22, 14 November 2006 (CST)