Talk:Sathya Sai Baba: Revision history

28 February 2009

• curprev 14:4914:49, 28 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 76,511 bytes +76,511‎ →‎Content of Catalogue subpage is not a catalogue

25 February 2009

• curprev 02:1402:14, 25 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 76,300 bytes +75‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 01:5901:59, 25 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 76,225 bytes +4,741‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?

24 February 2009

• curprev 17:3517:35, 24 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 76,066 bytes +4,582‎ Hindu canonization rituals?
• curprev 16:5116:51, 24 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 75,467 bytes +1,052‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 04:2804:28, 24 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 75,322 bytes +907‎ Moved comment into proper time sequence; difference between sourced comment about hagiography rather than article drawing that conclusion
• curprev 02:0802:08, 24 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 74,415 bytes +1,365‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?

23 February 2009

• curprev 17:4517:45, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 73,905 bytes +855‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?: weasel words to skirt "hagiography"
• curprev 16:5616:56, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 73,050 bytes +1,566‎ No problem if the term is in a sourced quote; much problem if it is in general text
• curprev 16:3016:30, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 72,208 bytes +724‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?: fine, I'll just wait and see
• curprev 16:1516:15, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 71,950 bytes +466‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 14:4014:40, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 71,484 bytes +663‎ →‎Content of Catalogue subpage is not a catalogue
• curprev 14:4014:40, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 71,469 bytes +648‎ →‎Content of Catalogue subpage is not a catalogue
• curprev 14:3514:35, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Milton Beychok‎ 71,106 bytes +285‎ →‎Content of Catalogue subpage is not a catalogue: new section
• curprev 12:5912:59, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 70,821 bytes +306‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?: Okay, I'll wait to hear abour Andries about what he wants restored
• curprev 12:3312:33, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 70,515 bytes +9,070‎ No edit summary
• curprev 12:0212:02, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 69,671 bytes +362‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?: Howard and Andries, please tell me *exactly* what should or should not be restored. Thanks
• curprev 11:5811:58, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 69,310 bytes +1‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?: please, please indent correctly so that my tired old brain can focus on more important matters
• curprev 11:4911:49, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 69,309 bytes +1,220‎ Used repeatedly, outside quotes, to refer to Kasturi's writings.
• curprev 11:2511:25, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 68,089 bytes +6,644‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?: I'll be happy to resolve the dispute informally, if you like. If not, I don't know who and where you'll take it to for a formal resolution
• curprev 02:0102:01, 23 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 67,543 bytes +175‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?

22 February 2009

• curprev 17:2417:24, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 67,368 bytes +897‎ Kasturi, by your statement, is expert. I agree he is neither neutral nor an academic, but those are not unimpeachable credentials
• curprev 17:1617:16, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ m 66,471 bytes 0‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 17:1617:16, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ m 66,471 bytes +1‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 17:1517:15, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 66,470 bytes +5,025‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 17:0517:05, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 65,943 bytes +212‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 16:5916:59, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 65,731 bytes +1,703‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 16:5716:57, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 65,566 bytes +1,532‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 16:5316:53, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 65,314 bytes +1,280‎ Hagiography, in this context, is non-neutral
• curprev 16:3516:35, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ m 64,034 bytes +6‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 16:2616:26, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 64,032 bytes +4‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 16:2116:21, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 64,028 bytes +1,829‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 16:2116:21, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 64,027 bytes +1,828‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 13:0713:07, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 63,554 bytes +1,355‎ Still having a sense the Neutrality Policy is not understood
• curprev 12:2812:28, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ m 62,649 bytes +450‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 12:1712:17, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 62,648 bytes +449‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 11:5011:50, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 62,199 bytes +754‎ No edit summary
• curprev 11:4411:44, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 61,445 bytes +1,994‎ →‎Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 11:4411:44, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 61,445 bytes +554‎ Schulman why was this removed?
• curprev 11:3811:38, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 60,891 bytes +278‎ →‎Trying for better readability
• curprev 08:1708:17, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 60,613 bytes 0‎ →‎Universal, but not universal
• curprev 08:1508:15, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 60,613 bytes +1,162‎ →‎Universal, but not universal
• curprev 08:0508:05, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Tom Morris‎ 60,235 bytes +711‎ →‎Universal, but not universal: new section
• curprev 03:0703:07, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 59,524 bytes +73‎ →‎Tightened section about life
• curprev 03:0603:06, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 59,451 bytes +20,261‎ →‎Tightened section about life
• curprev 02:4902:49, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 59,258 bytes +1‎ →‎Tightened section about life
• curprev 02:4802:48, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 59,257 bytes +994‎ →‎Tightened section about life
• curprev 02:3502:35, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 58,939 bytes +653‎ →‎Tightened section about life
• curprev 02:2702:27, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 58,286 bytes +23‎ →‎Tightened section about life: Babb explained very well why the word hagiography is more accurate and appropraite in this case than biography.
• curprev 02:2502:25, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 58,263 bytes +18,189‎ →‎Tightened section about life
• curprev 02:2202:22, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 58,068 bytes +690‎ →‎Tightened section about life
• curprev 02:2202:22, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 57,502 bytes +124‎ →‎Tightened section about life
• curprev 02:1502:15, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ m 57,378 bytes +3,509‎ →‎Tightened section about life
• curprev 02:1402:14, 22 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 57,377 bytes +3,508‎ →‎Tightened section about life

21 February 2009

• curprev 17:2217:22, 21 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 57,028 bytes +506‎ Redlink balance
• curprev 17:1617:16, 21 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 56,522 bytes +2,653‎ →‎One-word translations: make the necessary changes
• curprev 16:5316:53, 21 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 56,423 bytes +2,554‎ →‎One-word translations: new section
• curprev 16:2316:23, 21 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 55,598 bytes +1,729‎ Neutrality issues remain; the proposed integrated text is non-neutral. How is it to be balanced?
• curprev 16:0916:09, 21 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 53,869 bytes +13,795‎ Fundamental mistake
• curprev 15:5515:55, 21 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ m 53,355 bytes +2‎ →‎Tightened section about life
• curprev 15:5315:53, 21 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 53,353 bytes +4,772‎ →‎Tightened section about life
• curprev 15:2015:20, 21 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 50,958 bytes +2,377‎ →‎Tightened section about life: new section
• curprev 15:1315:13, 21 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ m 49,133 bytes +552‎ →‎Already much better than Wikipedia
• curprev 14:4114:41, 21 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 49,133 bytes +552‎ →‎Already much better than Wikipedia
• curprev 12:1312:13, 21 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 48,581 bytes +7,952‎ →‎To Both Howard and Andries from a Constable

20 February 2009

• curprev 20:2120:21, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 48,434 bytes +693‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion: "godman" doesn't exist in standard American or British English
• curprev 19:1319:13, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 47,741 bytes +1,072‎ Advisability of standard English and avoiding dialect/idioms in ledes
• curprev 18:5818:58, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 46,877 bytes +208‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion
• curprev 18:5018:50, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 46,669 bytes +2,402‎ Sentence references and clarity of "godman"
• curprev 18:3918:39, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 44,267 bytes +346‎ →‎Babb, etc.
• curprev 18:2518:25, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 43,921 bytes +3,292‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion: The term "godman" is explained to some extent in the introduction/summary in the following sentence.
• curprev 18:0618:06, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 43,521 bytes +1‎ →‎SSB
• curprev 18:0518:05, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 43,520 bytes +2,891‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion
• curprev 18:0118:01, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 43,236 bytes +2,607‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion
• curprev 17:5717:57, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 42,960 bytes +758‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion
• curprev 17:5317:53, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 42,420 bytes +218‎ →‎SSB
• curprev 17:4817:48, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 42,202 bytes +1,377‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion
• curprev 17:4517:45, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 40,825 bytes +196‎ →‎To Both Howard and Andries from a Constable
• curprev 17:3817:38, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 40,629 bytes +555‎ →‎To Both Howard and Andries from a Constable
• curprev 17:3417:34, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ m 40,081 bytes +7‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph: major re-write that I planned is cancelled
• curprev 17:3217:32, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 40,074 bytes +884‎ →‎SSB
• curprev 17:2517:25, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 40,036 bytes +846‎ →‎To Both Howard and Andries from a Constable: contains information from several sources and then I see no possibility to avoid several citations for only one sentence.
• curprev 17:2317:23, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ m 39,777 bytes +9‎ put my comment back in original position
• curprev 17:1717:17, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ m 39,769 bytes +1‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion
• curprev 17:1617:16, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 39,768 bytes +578‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion
• curprev 16:5916:59, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 39,560 bytes +370‎ →‎SSB
• curprev 16:2616:26, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 39,323 bytes +133‎ →‎Babb, etc.: definition already written
• curprev 16:1516:15, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 39,190 bytes +38,964‎ →‎The Findings
• curprev 15:5815:58, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 37,833 bytes +232‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion: local fame this is what Babb wrote and I corrected it.
• curprev 11:0411:04, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 37,601 bytes +2,077‎ →‎The Findings
• curprev 06:3206:32, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 37,158 bytes +1,345‎ →‎The Findings
• curprev 06:2706:27, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 36,552 bytes +739‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion
• curprev 02:3502:35, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 35,813 bytes +289‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion
• curprev 02:3202:32, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 35,524 bytes +472‎ →‎The Findings
• curprev 02:0502:05, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 35,052 bytes +208‎ →‎SSB
• curprev 01:4501:45, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 34,843 bytes −1‎ →‎The Findings
• curprev 01:4501:45, 20 February 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 34,844 bytes +12,964‎ →‎The Findings: new section

19 February 2009

• curprev 21:5321:53, 19 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 34,588 bytes +3,641‎ →‎oiling and sexual abuse: new section
• curprev 19:1619:16, 19 February 2009‎ imported>Ro Thorpe‎ 34,444 bytes +703‎ →‎SSB: hear ye
• curprev 19:0819:08, 19 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 34,364 bytes +623‎ →‎Editorializing/noncited opinion: new section
• curprev 19:0519:05, 19 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 33,741 bytes +2,427‎ →‎Cobras: new section
• curprev 18:5618:56, 19 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 31,774 bytes +460‎ →‎SSB: new section
• curprev 18:4718:47, 19 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 31,314 bytes +367‎ →‎what is the guy's real name?: I've moved stuff out of the first sentence and put it elsewhere, but now it needs to be rewritten
• curprev 17:0617:06, 19 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 30,947 bytes +5,323‎ →‎what is the guy's real name?

18 February 2009

• curprev 19:0619:06, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 30,674 bytes +791‎ →‎what is the guy's real name?: new section
• curprev 17:2317:23, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 29,883 bytes +4,259‎ Paging a Religion editor
• curprev 17:2217:22, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 29,650 bytes +2,965‎ →‎Neutrality in leads
• curprev 17:2117:21, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 29,601 bytes +42‎ →‎Neutrality in leads
• curprev 17:2117:21, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 29,559 bytes +839‎ →‎Neutrality in leads
• curprev 17:1617:16, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 29,272 bytes +552‎ →‎Neutrality in leads
• curprev 17:1517:15, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 29,010 bytes +290‎ →‎Neutrality in leads
• curprev 17:1317:13, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 28,720 bytes +2,035‎ →‎Neutrality in leads
• curprev 17:0617:06, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 28,158 bytes +1,473‎ →‎Neutrality in leads
• curprev 17:0317:03, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 26,881 bytes +196‎ →‎Neutrality in leads
• curprev 16:5716:57, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 26,685 bytes +1,061‎ BBC and the Times are not international tribunals; the analogy fails
• curprev 16:4316:43, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ m 25,624 bytes +3,744‎ →‎Neutrality in leads
• curprev 16:4216:42, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 25,621 bytes +1‎ →‎Neutrality in leads
• curprev 16:4016:40, 18 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 25,620 bytes +973‎ →‎Neutrality in leads

17 February 2009

• curprev 18:1918:19, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 24,647 bytes +2,767‎ Critical vs. neutral
• curprev 17:4217:42, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 24,175 bytes +1,969‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 17:3517:35, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 22,206 bytes +324‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 17:2917:29, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 21,882 bytes +2‎ Concern about neutrality
• curprev 17:2817:28, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 21,880 bytes +945‎ Concern about neutrality
• curprev 17:1617:16, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 21,134 bytes +199‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 17:0017:00, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 20,935 bytes +11,574‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 16:5816:58, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 20,604 bytes +722‎ edit conflict, but now I've got mine in
• curprev 16:5416:54, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 19,882 bytes +14‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 16:5416:54, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 19,868 bytes +2,904‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 16:4316:43, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 19,561 bytes +187‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 16:4216:42, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 19,374 bytes +341‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 16:4016:40, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 19,033 bytes +2,069‎ Moving to a sandbox may be appropriate
• curprev 16:3316:33, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 16,964 bytes +435‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph: then why not just delete the article?
• curprev 16:2616:26, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 16,529 bytes +7,168‎ /* a personal opinion about the lede paragraph SSB said that he will die as a young man, so the wheelchair is relevant. (Babb
• curprev 16:1416:14, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 16,321 bytes +6,960‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 15:0515:05, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 15,682 bytes +3,202‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 14:3414:34, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 14,194 bytes +372‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph: Here is an example of too much detail.
• curprev 12:5312:53, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 13,822 bytes +1,342‎ Overwhelmed in detail but lacking interpretation
• curprev 08:2008:20, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 12,480 bytes +3,118‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 02:3702:37, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ m 11,902 bytes 0‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 02:3702:37, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 11,902 bytes +1,143‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 02:3602:36, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 11,795 bytes +1,036‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 02:2102:21, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 11,791 bytes +216‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 02:1402:14, 17 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 11,575 bytes +327‎ →‎Who is the Topic Informant? Why so much Wikipedia style still here?

16 February 2009

• curprev 22:5022:50, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 11,248 bytes +489‎ Not interested enough in the subject to rewrite
• curprev 22:2822:28, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 10,759 bytes +513‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph: well, feel free to rewrite it to CZ specs
• curprev 21:2621:26, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 10,246 bytes +884‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 21:2421:24, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 9,930 bytes +568‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph
• curprev 21:0321:03, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 9,522 bytes +160‎ →‎a personal opinion about the lede paragraph: new section
• curprev 20:2820:28, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 9,362 bytes +1‎ →‎To Both Howard and Andres from a Constable: corrected spelling of Andries -- sorry!
• curprev 20:1920:19, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 9,361 bytes +9,135‎ →‎To Both Howard and Andres from a Constable: thanks for the explanation
• curprev 19:1819:18, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 8,973 bytes +8,747‎ →‎To Both Howard and Andres from a Constable
• curprev 18:1818:18, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 7,314 bytes +2,471‎ →‎To Both Howard and Andres from a Constable: new section
• curprev 18:1818:18, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 5,258 bytes +415‎ First-pass Babb cleanup
• curprev 17:2017:20, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 4,843 bytes +4,617‎ Technical information on CZ citations
• curprev 17:0517:05, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 4,313 bytes +184‎ No edit summary
• curprev 17:0317:03, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 4,136 bytes +7‎ Explaining references, neutrality policy requirement to keep devotees
• curprev 17:0117:01, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 4,129 bytes +1,831‎ Explaining what was done to improve citation,not remove any bibliographic content
• curprev 16:3616:36, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 2,298 bytes +902‎ →‎Trying for better readability
• curprev 16:2416:24, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 2,175 bytes +164‎ →‎Trying for better readability
• curprev 16:2216:22, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 2,011 bytes +13‎ →‎Trying for better readability
• curprev 16:2116:21, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 1,998 bytes +316‎ →‎Trying for better readability
• curprev 16:1316:13, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 1,682 bytes +286‎ →‎Who is the Topic Informant? Why so much Wikipedia style still here?
• curprev 16:1316:13, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 1,658 bytes +262‎ →‎Who is the Topic Informant? Why so much Wikipedia style still here?
• curprev 14:1214:12, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 1,396 bytes +1,170‎ →‎Who is the Topic Informant? Why so much Wikipedia style still here?: new section
• curprev 11:1511:15, 16 February 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 1,066 bytes +840‎ →‎Trying for better readability: new section

14 November 2007

• curprev 13:4013:40, 14 November 2007‎ imported>Subpagination Bot‎ m 226 bytes +226‎ Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)

28 May 2007

• curprev 03:4003:40, 28 May 2007‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 557 bytes 0‎ changed check list status from 4 to 1 though I think that the entry should be far more concise and in other respects deserves expansion with material from Babb
• curprev 03:3803:38, 28 May 2007‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ m 557 bytes 0‎ No edit summary

26 May 2007

• curprev 07:2407:24, 26 May 2007‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 557 bytes +449‎ checklist

19 May 2007

• curprev 10:1210:12, 19 May 2007‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 212 bytes +104‎ Wait a bit before deletion, please. ~~~~

23 April 2007

• curprev 22:1022:10, 23 April 2007‎ imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux‎ 108 bytes +108‎ The entry needs to be far more concise.