Talk:Ring (mathematics): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Simen Rustad mNo edit summary |
imported>Simen Rustad No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Started editing | Started editing the article. I'm afraid it doesn't easily lead itself to being turned into prose. | ||
Some points: | Some points: | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*I cut down on the number of examples, rather focusing on the basic examples. If you are looking for examples of rings, I guess knowing that the set polynomials are rings is good enough, and knowing that the set of polynomials with coefficients in a ring i a ring only creates confusion. Same fact with matrices and functions. | *I cut down on the number of examples, rather focusing on the basic examples. If you are looking for examples of rings, I guess knowing that the set polynomials are rings is good enough, and knowing that the set of polynomials with coefficients in a ring i a ring only creates confusion. Same fact with matrices and functions. | ||
* | *Should we say more about ideals? | ||
* | *Removed "Basic theorems" | ||
*" | *Cut down on "Construction of new rings" | ||
*History of the subject should be included. | *History of the subject should be included. (Problem with regards to ring theory page) | ||
[[User:Simen Rustad|Simen Rustad]] | |||
Apart from that, I don't know what else should be here, except possibly some things from ring theory, if that is merged in. Maintaining a separate page on ideals could also be discussed. | |||
[[User:Simen Rustad|Simen Rustad]] 13:49, 2 November 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 14:49, 2 November 2006
Notes
Started editing the article. I'm afraid it doesn't easily lead itself to being turned into prose.
Some points:
- I removed the existence of an identity element from the axioms.
- I cut down on the number of examples, rather focusing on the basic examples. If you are looking for examples of rings, I guess knowing that the set polynomials are rings is good enough, and knowing that the set of polynomials with coefficients in a ring i a ring only creates confusion. Same fact with matrices and functions.
- Should we say more about ideals?
- Removed "Basic theorems"
- Cut down on "Construction of new rings"
- History of the subject should be included. (Problem with regards to ring theory page)
Apart from that, I don't know what else should be here, except possibly some things from ring theory, if that is merged in. Maintaining a separate page on ideals could also be discussed. Simen Rustad 13:49, 2 November 2006 (CST)