Talk:Recovered memory: Revision history

27 April 2009

• curprev 10:2210:22, 27 April 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 109,243 bytes +1,666‎ →‎Recap
• curprev 07:5207:52, 27 April 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 108,291 bytes +714‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?

28 March 2009

• curprev 08:5508:55, 28 March 2009‎ imported>D. Matt Innis‎ m 107,577 bytes 0‎ Unprotected "Talk:Recovered memory": unlock temporary protection
• curprev 05:3005:30, 28 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 107,577 bytes 0‎ →‎Williams reference sentence section moved to talk
• curprev 05:2405:24, 28 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 107,577 bytes +2,263‎ →‎Williams reference sentence section moved to talk
• curprev 04:3604:36, 28 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 106,919 bytes −2,297‎ →‎Williams reference sentence section moved to talk

27 March 2009

• curprev 23:0623:06, 27 March 2009‎ imported>D. Matt Innis‎ m 106,057 bytes −3,159‎ Protected "Talk:Recovered memory": momentary lock [edit=sysop:move=sysop]
• curprev 23:0523:05, 27 March 2009‎ imported>D. Matt Innis‎ 106,057 bytes −5,619‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?: moved to Howard's talk
• curprev 23:0423:04, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 111,676 bytes +95‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?
• curprev 23:0223:02, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 111,581 bytes −1‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?
• curprev 23:0123:01, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 111,582 bytes +587‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?
• curprev 22:5622:56, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 110,995 bytes +18‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?
• curprev 22:5422:54, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 110,977 bytes +761‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?: put in my comment that once again got pushed aside by an Edit Conflict
• curprev 22:5422:54, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 110,216 bytes +1,000‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?
• curprev 22:5222:52, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 109,964 bytes +748‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?
• curprev 22:4722:47, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 109,216 bytes +936‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?: inserted my comment above Howard's latest, an Edit Conflict intervened
• curprev 22:3922:39, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 108,384 bytes +1,225‎ Already responded in email to Constabulary
• curprev 22:3822:38, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 107,159 bytes +292‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?: I will look at Neil's talk page
• curprev 22:3522:35, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 106,867 bytes +79‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?
• curprev 22:3422:34, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 106,788 bytes −1,492‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?
• curprev 22:2922:29, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 106,290 bytes +429‎ restoring talk page comment deleted by another editor
• curprev 22:2622:26, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 105,861 bytes −2,419‎ →‎Howard, why did you remove Neil's last (unindent) comment?: new section
• curprev 22:2522:25, 27 March 2009‎ imported>D. Matt Innis‎ m 105,426 bytes −2,854‎ →‎Neutrality etc: add a verb
• curprev 22:2422:24, 27 March 2009‎ imported>D. Matt Innis‎ 105,418 bytes −2,862‎ →‎Neutrality etc: {{Freshstart}}
• curprev 22:2022:20, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 108,280 bytes +2,966‎ I deny I changed any substance; I in fact fixed a non-working hyperlink
• curprev 22:2022:20, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 108,019 bytes +286‎ →‎Williams reference sentence section moved to talk
• curprev 22:1422:14, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 107,733 bytes +662‎ The paraphrase is entirely appropriate
• curprev 22:1322:13, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 107,076 bytes +5‎ →‎Neutrality etc
• curprev 22:1222:12, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 107,071 bytes +1,757‎ →‎Neutrality etc
• curprev 22:0722:07, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 106,678 bytes +662‎ None of the Citizen's words of comment were removed. A citation was reformatted with all, and more, of the removed text at the link
• curprev 22:0422:04, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 106,016 bytes +447‎ →‎Williams reference sentence section moved to talk
• curprev 22:0022:00, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 105,569 bytes +255‎ →‎Neutrality etc
• curprev 21:5621:56, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 105,314 bytes +67,884‎ Again trying to remove whitespace, but also explaining why unneeded quote, now in strikethrough, was removed
• curprev 21:4921:49, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 104,558 bytes +344‎ restore quote deleted from my comment, fixing talk page, unable to add back time stamp
• curprev 21:3721:37, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 104,214 bytes +191‎ Typos and reducing whitespace and null fields in citations; agree link should not be used at all
• curprev 21:3021:30, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 104,023 bytes +5‎ →‎Neutrality etc=
• curprev 21:2821:28, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 104,018 bytes +3,940‎ williams' reference sentence
• curprev 21:1821:18, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 101,838 bytes +1,598‎ →‎Neutrality etc=
• curprev 08:4108:41, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 101,407 bytes +1,167‎ What kind of amnesia is it when I forgot there were amnesia articles? :-(
• curprev 08:2608:26, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 100,240 bytes +162‎ Ahem...forgot there was already were amnesia articles
• curprev 08:0708:07, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 100,078 bytes +8,969‎ →‎Good new content on amnesia: new section
• curprev 05:0405:04, 27 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 98,871 bytes +698‎ →‎Neutrality etc=: Absolutely no

26 March 2009

• curprev 21:0621:06, 26 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 98,173 bytes +7,064‎ →‎Difficult to review when substantial quotes are in footnotes only: new section
• curprev 21:0621:06, 26 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 97,641 bytes +1,592‎ →‎Neutrality etc=
• curprev 21:0521:05, 26 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 97,638 bytes +1,589‎ →‎Neutrality etc=
• curprev 10:1310:13, 26 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 96,049 bytes +3,477‎ →‎Neutrality etc=
• curprev 08:4908:49, 26 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 92,572 bytes +1,463‎ →‎Just to be clear

25 March 2009

• curprev 20:5820:58, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 91,109 bytes +29,055‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 16:0516:05, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 90,695 bytes +2,270‎ No edit summary
• curprev 15:3415:34, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 88,425 bytes +4,237‎ →‎Just to be clear
• curprev 14:4214:42, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ m 86,058 bytes 0‎ →‎Just to be clear: (hope that wasn't a Freudian typo)
• curprev 14:2914:29, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 86,058 bytes +1,220‎ →‎Just to be clear
• curprev 13:4613:46, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 84,838 bytes +650‎ →‎"Neurologic basis of memory" needs work
• curprev 10:5810:58, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 84,188 bytes +9,996‎ CZ is not Google; Google is not CZ
• curprev 10:3610:36, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 83,553 bytes +200‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 10:3310:33, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 83,353 bytes +342‎ Reason to have individual cases? I don't see it.
• curprev 10:2810:28, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 83,011 bytes +288‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 08:4508:45, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 82,723 bytes +8,531‎ No edit summary
• curprev 07:3007:30, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 80,731 bytes +3‎ →‎"Neurologic basis of memory" needs work
• curprev 05:2005:20, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 80,728 bytes +2,747‎ →‎"Neurologic basis of memory" needs work
• curprev 04:3504:35, 25 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 77,981 bytes +455‎ →‎Notes

24 March 2009

• curprev 23:3723:37, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 77,526 bytes +2,623‎ →‎"Neurologic basis of memory" needs work: new section
• curprev 23:0623:06, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 74,903 bytes +711‎ Paid content, but here's the search string that returns a Google hit on exact text in the cited article
• curprev 23:0223:02, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 74,192 bytes +12,138‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 22:5922:59, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 74,192 bytes +1,122‎ A memory may be elicited. Whether or not it is a valid memory is another issue
• curprev 22:5722:57, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 73,070 bytes +157‎ No edit summary
• curprev 22:4522:45, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 72,913 bytes +310‎ No edit summary
• curprev 22:3722:37, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 72,603 bytes −2‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 22:3622:36, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 72,605 bytes +7‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 22:3622:36, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 72,598 bytes +3,475‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 22:3122:31, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 71,624 bytes +2,501‎ →‎Recovered memory therapy needs clarification: new section
• curprev 13:4313:43, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 69,123 bytes +1,159‎ →‎Improving "Effects of trauma on memory"
• curprev 13:3313:33, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 67,964 bytes +3,451‎ →‎Improving "Effects of trauma on memory": new section
• curprev 05:3005:30, 24 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 64,513 bytes +1,424‎ →‎Bibliography

21 March 2009

• curprev 13:2613:26, 21 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 63,089 bytes +1,035‎ →‎Trauma and memory should be in its own article, certainly not the end
• curprev 13:2513:25, 21 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 63,105 bytes +271‎ →‎Trauma and memory should be in its own article, certainly not the end
• curprev 05:5705:57, 21 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 62,834 bytes +780‎ →‎Trauma and memory should be in its own article, certainly not the end
• curprev 00:0200:02, 21 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 62,054 bytes +24,624‎ →‎Trauma and memory should be in its own article, certainly not the end

20 March 2009

• curprev 23:0623:06, 20 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 60,197 bytes +359‎ No edit summary
• curprev 22:5322:53, 20 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 59,838 bytes +1,533‎ →‎Trauma and memory should be in its own article, certainly not the end
• curprev 14:4114:41, 20 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 59,671 bytes +790‎ Avoiding duplication
• curprev 14:3714:37, 20 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 59,114 bytes +8‎ →‎Trauma and memory should be in its own article, certainly not the end
• curprev 14:3014:30, 20 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 59,106 bytes +225‎ →‎Trauma and memory should be in its own article, certainly not the end
• curprev 12:5412:54, 20 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 58,881 bytes +576‎ →‎On Gareth's note on professional organizations
• curprev 10:5610:56, 20 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 58,305 bytes +12,524‎ →‎On Gareth's note on professional organizations: new section
• curprev 10:4910:49, 20 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 57,319 bytes +4,445‎ What you are describing may be different. PTSD references do not or minimally address it. Why, then, are you emphasizing PTSD?
• curprev 09:2509:25, 20 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 53,110 bytes +236‎ →‎Examining some text just reinserted.
• curprev 00:3400:34, 20 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 52,874 bytes +826‎ →‎Examining some text just reinserted.
• curprev 00:3300:33, 20 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 52,048 bytes +68‎ Undo revision 100466061 by Howard C. Berkowitz (Talk)
• curprev 00:3200:32, 20 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 51,980 bytes −68‎ No edit summary

19 March 2009

• curprev 23:4623:46, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 52,048 bytes +894‎ →‎Trauma and memory should be in its own article, certainly not the end: new section
• curprev 23:1823:18, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 51,154 bytes +669‎ →‎Examining some text just reinserted.
• curprev 23:0723:07, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 50,485 bytes +3,320‎ Connections still needed
• curprev 21:4421:44, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 49,335 bytes +580‎ →‎CSA -- what does it mean?: Then please put it into the article in the appropriate place.
• curprev 21:4121:41, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 49,203 bytes +448‎ trying not to get into another edit conflict
• curprev 21:2421:24, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 48,755 bytes +290‎ →‎CSA -- what does it mean?: new section
• curprev 21:2321:23, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 48,465 bytes +1,300‎ →‎Could we try a clear English paraphrase of Sheflin and Brown?
• curprev 21:2021:20, 19 March 2009‎ imported>D. Matt Innis‎ 47,485 bytes +112‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!: return Neil's comment as well
• curprev 21:1621:16, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ m 47,373 bytes +1,296‎ Reverted edits by Neil Brick (Talk) to last version by Howard C. Berkowitz
• curprev 21:0721:07, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 46,077 bytes −1,296‎ peer reviewed
• curprev 20:3820:38, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 47,373 bytes +208‎ →‎Examining some text just reinserted.
• curprev 20:3620:36, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 47,165 bytes +1,384‎ →‎Examining some text just reinserted.
• curprev 20:3520:35, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ m 46,953 bytes +21‎ →‎Scope of what U.S. District Courts do.
• curprev 20:2820:28, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 46,932 bytes +1,151‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!
• curprev 18:0518:05, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Shamira Gelbman‎ 45,964 bytes +183‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!
• curprev 17:5717:57, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 45,781 bytes +8,351‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!
• curprev 17:3717:37, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 44,450 bytes +118‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 17:3517:35, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 44,332 bytes +6,902‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 17:2517:25, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 43,605 bytes +2‎ No edit summary
• curprev 16:5316:53, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 43,603 bytes +2,755‎ →‎Apropos "this is not specifically about sexual abuse"
• curprev 16:5116:51, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 40,848 bytes +3,418‎ →‎Examining some text just reinserted.
• curprev 10:4510:45, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 39,293 bytes +2,265‎ No edit summary
• curprev 10:3210:32, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 37,028 bytes −402‎ →‎Could we try a clear English paraphrase of Sheflin and Brown?: removed a comment for its unprofessionalism
• curprev 00:3600:36, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 37,430 bytes +37,430‎ No edit summary
• curprev 00:0200:02, 19 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 35,839 bytes +1,673‎ →‎Could we try a clear English paraphrase of Sheflin and Brown?

18 March 2009

• curprev 23:5823:58, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 35,594 bytes +510‎ →‎Could we try a clear English paraphrase of Sheflin and Brown?
• curprev 23:5423:54, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 35,084 bytes +16‎ →‎Could we try a clear English paraphrase of Sheflin and Brown?
• curprev 23:5423:54, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 35,068 bytes +67‎ →‎Could we try a clear English paraphrase of Sheflin and Brown?
• curprev 23:4023:40, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 35,001 bytes +835‎ →‎Could we try a clear English paraphrase of Sheflin and Brown?
• curprev 23:3623:36, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 34,166 bytes −6‎ →‎Could we try a clear English paraphrase of Sheflin and Brown?
• curprev 23:3423:34, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 34,172 bytes +161‎ →‎Could we try a clear English paraphrase of Sheflin and Brown?
• curprev 23:3123:31, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 34,011 bytes +6,146‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!
• curprev 23:2923:29, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 33,527 bytes +5,662‎ →‎Could we try a clear English paraphrase of Sheflin and Brown?: new section
• curprev 23:1823:18, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 31,711 bytes +3,846‎ The journal may contain peer-reviewed articles, but not exclusively -- there is good reason to believe this specific article is not peer-reviewed
• curprev 22:3222:32, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 31,113 bytes +549‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!
• curprev 22:2922:29, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ m 30,888 bytes +324‎ →‎Examining some text just reinserted.
• curprev 22:2522:25, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 30,564 bytes +2,699‎ →‎Examining some text just reinserted.: new section
• curprev 22:2022:20, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 29,563 bytes +1,698‎ →‎Scope of what U.S. District Courts do.: new section
• curprev 22:0622:06, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 27,865 bytes +2,085‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!
• curprev 22:0222:02, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 27,638 bytes +181‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!
• curprev 21:5621:56, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 27,457 bytes +1,677‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!
• curprev 21:5321:53, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 27,051 bytes +557‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!
• curprev 21:2021:20, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 26,494 bytes +192‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!: I'll be like Van Heflin backin' up Alan Ladd in Shane (was Ladd standing on a box, or were the bad guys standing in holes?)
• curprev 21:1921:19, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 26,302 bytes +522‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 21:1221:12, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 25,780 bytes +4,347‎ No edit summary
• curprev 20:3420:34, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 25,639 bytes +4,206‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!: why not nuke it, then?
• curprev 19:2419:24, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 25,530 bytes +4,097‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!
• curprev 18:3318:33, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 22,652 bytes +172‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!: hmmmm
• curprev 18:0418:04, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 22,480 bytes +707‎ Maybe -- it may be that the link is to an editorial
• curprev 17:4417:44, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 21,773 bytes +340‎ →‎Editorializing (I think) in a footnote!: new section
• curprev 12:4212:42, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 21,433 bytes +21,421‎ →‎Section on neurological basis
• curprev 12:4112:41, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 21,434 bytes +60‎ →‎Section on neurological basis
• curprev 12:3912:39, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 21,374 bytes +21,362‎ →‎Section on neurological basis
• curprev 12:2712:27, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 20,447 bytes +1,514‎ →‎Apropos "this is not specifically about sexual abuse"
• curprev 12:2212:22, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 19,823 bytes +890‎ →‎Apropos "this is not specifically about sexual abuse"
• curprev 12:1212:12, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 19,156 bytes +223‎ →‎Apropos "this is not specifically about sexual abuse"
• curprev 12:1012:10, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 18,933 bytes +18,921‎ →‎Apropos "this is not specifically about sexual abuse"
• curprev 11:4611:46, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 18,674 bytes +925‎ →‎Apropos "this is not specifically about sexual abuse": new section
• curprev 11:1611:16, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 17,749 bytes +440‎ →‎Style issue
• curprev 11:0811:08, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 17,309 bytes +1,438‎ →‎First attempt on unifying context: new section
• curprev 11:0111:01, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 15,871 bytes +1,038‎ →‎intro too long
• curprev 10:3510:35, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 15,283 bytes +246‎ →‎intro too long: new section
• curprev 06:0906:09, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 15,037 bytes +204‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 06:0806:08, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 14,895 bytes +62‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 06:0506:05, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 14,833 bytes +4,015‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 06:0406:04, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 14,924 bytes +3,070‎ →‎Notes
• curprev 06:0206:02, 18 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 14,923 bytes +2,222‎ →‎Style issue

17 March 2009

• curprev 22:4222:42, 17 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 12,701 bytes +847‎ More style suggestions
• curprev 22:1622:16, 17 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 11,854 bytes +1,036‎ →‎Style issue
• curprev 21:3721:37, 17 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 11,563 bytes +745‎ →‎Style issue: new section

16 March 2009

• curprev 17:3217:32, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 10,818 bytes +598‎ No edit summary
• curprev 17:2417:24, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 10,220 bytes +10,208‎ →‎Medicolegal
• curprev 16:3316:33, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 10,094 bytes +351‎ Medicolegal section?
• curprev 12:3512:35, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 9,743 bytes +9,731‎ →‎Context of "trauma"
• curprev 11:5311:53, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 8,467 bytes +2,842‎ →‎Context of "trauma"
• curprev 11:2311:23, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 7,941 bytes +2,146‎ →‎Context of "trauma": new section
• curprev 11:2011:20, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ 5,795 bytes +170‎ →‎Bibliography
• curprev 11:1511:15, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Chris Day‎ m 5,625 bytes +5,613‎ Talk:Neurological theories of recovered memory moved to Talk:Recovered memory: REMEMBER_click_move_all_subpages
• curprev 11:0011:00, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 5,625 bytes +5,613‎ →‎Bibliography
• curprev 09:3909:39, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 5,121 bytes +2,218‎ →‎Bibliography
• curprev 09:0209:02, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 4,966 bytes +2,063‎ →‎Bibliography
• curprev 07:3507:35, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 2,903 bytes +171‎ →‎Bibliography
• curprev 07:3407:34, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 2,732 bytes +1,553‎ →‎Bibliography
• curprev 06:5206:52, 16 March 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 1,908 bytes +729‎ →‎Appropriateness of external links; pattern of introducing content

15 March 2009

• curprev 22:4622:46, 15 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 1,637 bytes +156‎ →‎Appropriateness of external links; pattern of introducing content
• curprev 22:4322:43, 15 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 1,481 bytes +302‎ No edit summary
• curprev 22:3022:30, 15 March 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 1,179 bytes +1,167‎ →‎Appropriateness of external links; pattern of introducing content
• curprev 22:2222:22, 15 March 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 899 bytes +887‎ →‎Appropriateness of external links; pattern of introducing content: new section

11 February 2009

• curprev 00:4600:46, 11 February 2009‎ imported>Neil Brick‎ 12 bytes +12‎ create