Talk:Nathanael Greene/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Denis Cavanagh
imported>Robert W King
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Subpages9}}
{{Subpages}}


==Legacy==
==Legacy==

Revision as of 17:30, 13 November 2007

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A general in the Continental Army during the American Revolution; he became one of George Washington's most trusted aides. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History and Military [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Legacy

I am aware that many things have been named for Nathanael Greene (Greensboro, South Carolina, several schools, etc.), and WP even has a long unsourced list. I am unsure where, or if, these should be included in the article. Does anyone have any opinions on this? --Todd Coles 08:20, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

Approval

I think you should get an editor to look this over. Perhaps add a few books in the Bibliography too Denis Cavanagh 08:07, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

The problem with more books is that there just aren't a lot of books written on him specifically. There are plenty of American Revolution surveys and general military histories out there, but I figured I would concentrate the books here as specifically on his life as I could. (I'm tired, I don't know if that's making sense..)
Yes, I think it is very close, if not ready for approval. I've notified Richard Jensen about it, and I know he is aware of it, so I'm just going to leave it in his hands unless another editor comes along.
Thanks for the comment! --Todd Coles 08:28, 30 August 2007 (CDT)


This article is set to be offically approved today, and I'd like it to include the most recent edit I made, which was after the nomination.. it was a typo, as you can see in the history. --Todd Coles 09:21, 5 September 2007 (CDT)

Well done Todd, looking good! Denis Cavanagh 16:03, 5 September 2007 (CDT)

APPROVED Version 1.0