Talk:Mon (Japanese coin): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Aidan Work
m (Talk:Japanese mon moved to Talk:Mon (Japanese coin): The word 'mon' is not only used as a coinage unit,but also in Japanese heraldry.A disambiguation page is going to be created.)
imported>Petréa Mitchell
(Article checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Mon (Japanese coin)
|                cat1 = Economics
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 12:16, 22 April 2007 (CDT)
}}
Should this article, and the other ones on Japanese currency units, be combined into a single article, with sections for each, and a redirect from each individual one to the appropriate section? I ask this now because it is an example of what will be a very frequent occurrence,  
Should this article, and the other ones on Japanese currency units, be combined into a single article, with sections for each, and a redirect from each individual one to the appropriate section? I ask this now because it is an example of what will be a very frequent occurrence,  
as a great many WP articles are written this way. I think the reader is better served by having them together--its simpler than following the hyperlinks. (This is perhaps the difference between an encyclopedia and an encyclopedic dictionary)[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 19:59, 18 November 2006 (CST)
as a great many WP articles are written this way. I think the reader is better served by having them together--its simpler than following the hyperlinks. (This is perhaps the difference between an encyclopedia and an encyclopedic dictionary)[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 19:59, 18 November 2006 (CST)


:Yes! By all means! This would also enhance the chance that the more encompassing article would be written by a person who understand this... All the mini-articles for various coins leave the impression of being studiously copied, not written by someone who actually understand this. This is especially important with ancient coinage, uniting aureus, denarius, solidus, etc. [[User:Ori Redler|Ori Redler]] 01:43, 19 November 2006 (CST)
:Yes! By all means! This would also enhance the chance that the more encompassing article would be written by a person who understand this... All the mini-articles for various coins leave the impression of being studiously copied, not written by someone who actually understand this. This is especially important with ancient coinage, uniting aureus, denarius, solidus, etc. [[User:Ori Redler|Ori Redler]] 01:43, 19 November 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 12:16, 22 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Mon (Japanese coin)"
Workgroup category or categories Economics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 12:16, 22 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Should this article, and the other ones on Japanese currency units, be combined into a single article, with sections for each, and a redirect from each individual one to the appropriate section? I ask this now because it is an example of what will be a very frequent occurrence, as a great many WP articles are written this way. I think the reader is better served by having them together--its simpler than following the hyperlinks. (This is perhaps the difference between an encyclopedia and an encyclopedic dictionary)DavidGoodman 19:59, 18 November 2006 (CST)

Yes! By all means! This would also enhance the chance that the more encompassing article would be written by a person who understand this... All the mini-articles for various coins leave the impression of being studiously copied, not written by someone who actually understand this. This is especially important with ancient coinage, uniting aureus, denarius, solidus, etc. Ori Redler 01:43, 19 November 2006 (CST)