Talk:Microorganism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>DavidGoodman No edit summary |
imported>DavidGoodman (eukaryotes) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The gap from Leeuwenhoek to Pasteur is a very long one. When L is mentioned, Would it be better to talk about why L. did do than what he did not.?[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 21:02, 24 November 2006 (CST) | The gap from Leeuwenhoek to Pasteur is a very long one. When L is mentioned, Would it be better to talk about why L. did do than what he did not.?[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 21:02, 24 November 2006 (CST) | ||
:The statments that visible /invisible have exceptions occurs at least 5 times, 1 in each section. | |||
:The section on eukaryotic microorganisms neeeds to specifiy just what is included--a good trick--(my first research exerience was in protozoology, as it was then called). As you undoubtedly intend to include fungi, you'll have to explain that they are not plants. We should probably do a fngii article fairly early on. I'll start one from WP.[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 20:51, 25 November 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 21:51, 25 November 2006
The gap from Leeuwenhoek to Pasteur is a very long one. When L is mentioned, Would it be better to talk about why L. did do than what he did not.?DavidGoodman 21:02, 24 November 2006 (CST)
- The statments that visible /invisible have exceptions occurs at least 5 times, 1 in each section.
- The section on eukaryotic microorganisms neeeds to specifiy just what is included--a good trick--(my first research exerience was in protozoology, as it was then called). As you undoubtedly intend to include fungi, you'll have to explain that they are not plants. We should probably do a fngii article fairly early on. I'll start one from WP.DavidGoodman 20:51, 25 November 2006 (CST)