Talk:Language Evolution (book synopsis): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(arguably belongs as a subpage of the evolutionary linguistics article)
imported>David Finn
(→‎Move: concur)
Line 5: Line 5:
==Move==
==Move==
This is not an article, but a book synopsis, and thus arguably belongs as a subpage of the [[evolutionary linguistics]] article. It doesn't quite fit the existing subpage types, though, so I suggest creating a specific one, perhaps /Synopses. Also, with this article moved, we no longer need to have [[language evolution (disambiguation)]]. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 12:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
This is not an article, but a book synopsis, and thus arguably belongs as a subpage of the [[evolutionary linguistics]] article. It doesn't quite fit the existing subpage types, though, so I suggest creating a specific one, perhaps /Synopses. Also, with this article moved, we no longer need to have [[language evolution (disambiguation)]]. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 12:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
:I think you are correct on both counts. The subpages are great for grouping content like that, and since the only other article in the disambiguation list is redlinked that page would certainly be superfluous. [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 12:30, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:30, 19 November 2011

Start Talk page

Start Talk page. Anthony.Sebastian 02:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Move

This is not an article, but a book synopsis, and thus arguably belongs as a subpage of the evolutionary linguistics article. It doesn't quite fit the existing subpage types, though, so I suggest creating a specific one, perhaps /Synopses. Also, with this article moved, we no longer need to have language evolution (disambiguation). John Stephenson 12:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

I think you are correct on both counts. The subpages are great for grouping content like that, and since the only other article in the disambiguation list is redlinked that page would certainly be superfluous. David Finn 12:30, 19 November 2011 (UTC)