Talk:HTML: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>ZachPruckowski No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't this be titled HTML? [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 00:27, 29 January 2007 (CST) | Shouldn't this be titled HTML? [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 00:27, 29 January 2007 (CST) | ||
actually, Nancy I am also so inclined. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] 00:27, 29 January 2007 (CST) | actually, Nancy I am also so inclined. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] 00:27, 29 January 2007 (CST) | ||
I agree, it's usually all caps. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:41, 29 January 2007 (CST) | I agree, it's usually all caps. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:41, 29 January 2007 (CST) | ||
For what it's worth, I concur as well. I'll move it tomorrow if I hear no objections. -- [[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] 02:16, 29 January 2007 (CST) | |||
==Article Organization== | |||
We need to arrive at some form of article organization. We should at least try to list what sections we would like to have in the article -- [[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] 02:16, 29 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 03:16, 29 January 2007
Shouldn't this be titled HTML? Nancy Sculerati MD 00:27, 29 January 2007 (CST)
actually, Nancy I am also so inclined. Robert Tito 00:27, 29 January 2007 (CST)
I agree, it's usually all caps. --Larry Sanger 00:41, 29 January 2007 (CST)
For what it's worth, I concur as well. I'll move it tomorrow if I hear no objections. -- ZachPruckowski 02:16, 29 January 2007 (CST)
Article Organization
We need to arrive at some form of article organization. We should at least try to list what sections we would like to have in the article -- ZachPruckowski 02:16, 29 January 2007 (CST)